Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jérémy Bobbio
* Package name: ruby-haml-magic-translations
Version : 0.5.1
Upstream Author : potager.org
* URL : https://github.com/potager/haml-magic-translations
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description
On 2013-04-02 13:37:59 -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Vincent Lefevre]
> > I disagree. If the freeze occurred only once (almost) all RC bugs
> > were fixed, there would be (almost) no delay. I suspect that the
> > length of the freeze is due to the fact that the freeze occurred
> > while too many
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 09:55:09PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > And not, we do not have epochs to temporarily downgrade a package
> > after a botched upload.
>
> c.f. imagemagick
>
> I'm pretty sure we do.
It seems "we" usually upload a 2really1 package to fix that particular
mistake without in
Le Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 04:34:24AM +0800, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
>
> I even proposed my help for the review process (of other packages,
> not mine, of course...). This was a no-go refusal. I haven't seen
> either that the FTP team asked for help and new members, if
> I am seen as not qualified a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Etienne Millon
* Package name: libtcod
Version : 1.5.1
Upstream Author : Jice & Mingos
* URL : http://doryen.eptalys.net/libtcod/
* License : BSD-3
Programming Lang: C, C++
Description : cross-platform C/C++ libra
On Tue, 2013-04-02 at 17:24 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 02.04.2013 16:35, Svante Signell wrote:
> > The best solution would be having unstable _never_ frozen, at the
> > cost
> > of another repository during the freeze period. This was proposed
> > some
> > time ago, see
> > http://lists.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christoph Egger
* Package name: python-arpy
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Stanisław Pitucha
* URL : http://bitbucket.org/viraptor/arpy
* License : Simplified BSD
Programming Lang: python
Description : library f
On 2013-04-02 09:50:23 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Vincent Lefevre writes:
>
> > There are various problems with experimental, in particular dependencies
> > are not necessarily listed,
>
> Huh? I have no clue what you could possibly be talking about, unless
> you're just saying that some pack
On 2013-04-02 21:53:08 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Vincent,
>
> am Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 05:07:27PM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> > I don't think that the status even of a big package like iceweasel
> > is satisfactory.
>
> I pretty much agree. But what's the problem here? That xulrunner
On 2013-04-02 09:48:34 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Vincent Lefevre writes:
> > On 2013-04-02 14:29:46 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
>
> >> That is not how it actually works out. Policy changes are made which
> >> require old packages to build with new flags, compilers and toolchain
> >> packages g
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 12:19 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
Correction: Of course CUT should be testing during no freeze. If testing
remains unstable(t-dt) during a freeze it is still CUT. Otherwise CUT
can be defined as unstable(t) or "new_release"_RCx.
> I think it is "new" in the sense it adds a
On 2013-04-02 21:06:30 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> Just to expand slightly on this, the problem you're both poking at is
> that during a freeze, our incentives are directed towards fixing RC bugs
> (because then we can release, which means we can then do what we prefer
> to, which (as you can s
The NEW queue is not just for double-checking licenses.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2013040318.GB11273@debian
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: ownCloud for Debian maintainers
* Package name: pyOwnCloud
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : PyOwnCloud contributers
* URL : https://github.com/csawyerYumaed/pyOwnCloud
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: Python
Descr
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 03:44:48PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> The NEW queue is not just for double-checking licenses.
But it should be.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jérémy Bobbio
Control: block -1 by 624610 703068 703107 704583
* Package name: coquelicot
Version : 0.9.1
Upstream Author : potager.org
* URL : https://coquelicot.potager.org/
* License : AGPL-3+
Programming Lang: Ruby
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:12:22PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2013-04-02 21:06:30 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > Just to expand slightly on this, the problem you're both poking at is
> > that during a freeze, our incentives are directed towards fixing RC bugs
> > (because then we can rel
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 01:28:58PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > I pretty much agree. But what's the problem here? That xulrunner and
> > iceweasel have rdeps in the archive that aren't necessarily
> > compatible with a new version of iceweasel and hence introducing yet
> > another transition w
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 03:33:30PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 09:55:09PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > > And not, we do not have epochs to temporarily downgrade a package
> > > after a botched upload.
> > c.f. imagemagick
> > I'm pretty sure we do.
> It seems "we" u
Hi,
My problem with the radius.so plugin is that the binding IP address is
not used at all, even in the radiusclient-ng has this parameter: bindaddr.
I've created a small patch for radius plugin which enables this function
to set a fixed IP for each radius packet is send to the radius server.
On 2013-04-03 20:14:32 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:12:22PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > In general, bug-fix releases (which are also blocked by the freeze)
> > don't introduce new bugs.
>
> Case in point:
> http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Security-updates-br
On 2013-04-03 20:17:47 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 01:28:58PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > I pretty much agree. But what's the problem here? That xulrunner and
> > > iceweasel have rdeps in the archive that aren't necessarily
> > > compatible with a new version of ic
Hi Adrian,
debian-devel is about developping Debian as a whole, it's not the best adequate
list for reporting bugs regarding a specific package in Debian.
Please report a bug with tag 'patch' against package ppp, following guide at
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
Thanks in advance !
On Wed
Samuel Thibault writes:
>>when allocating an anonymous physical page on a Page Fault,
>> why does kernel have to fill it with zeroes?
>> I understand it has something to do with security.
>See man mmap. Anonymous memory is explicitly documented as being set to
>0.
>Samuel
Ok,thanks. So libraries
On 04/04/2013 06:39, Viacheslav Fedorov wrote:
> Samuel Thibault mailto:sthiba...@debian.org>> writes:
>>>when allocating an anonymous physical page on a Page Fault,
>>> why does kernel have to fill it with zeroes?
>>> I understand it has something to do with security.
>>See man mmap. Anonymous mem
]] Vincent Lefevre
> On 2013-04-02 21:06:30 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > Just to expand slightly on this, the problem you're both poking at is
> > that during a freeze, our incentives are directed towards fixing RC bugs
> > (because then we can release, which means we can then do what we pre
26 matches
Mail list logo
