Paul Gevers wrote...
> Is it just me or am I the only one getting bug reports from bugs that
> don't seem to exist on bugs.debian.org.
Now it's appearently back online, but a web tracking has been
added, as seen in #703298. That's disgusting.
Christoph
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-d
On 18-03-13 10:06, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Paul Gevers wrote...
>
>> Is it just me or am I the only one getting bug reports from bugs that
>> don't seem to exist on bugs.debian.org.
>
> Now it's appearently back online, but a web tracking has been
> added, as seen in #703298. That's disgusting
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
* Package name: fw-admin
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
* URL : https://github.com/aborrero/fw-admin
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: bash
Description : Dual st
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Evgeni Golov
* Package name: python-publicsuffix
Version : 1.0.4
Upstream Author : Tomaz Solc
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/publicsuffix
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : get a public s
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:06:26AM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Paul Gevers wrote...
>
> > Is it just me or am I the only one getting bug reports from bugs that
> > don't seem to exist on bugs.debian.org.
>
> Now it's appearently back online, but a web tracking has been
> added, as seen in #70
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:06:26AM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> > Paul Gevers wrote...
> >
> > > Is it just me or am I the only one getting bug reports from bugs that
> > > don't seem to exist on bugs.debian.org.
> >
> > Now it's appearently back
Better late than never ;)
Original Message
Subject: Re: Where does the update-initramfs hook get the kernel name
from?
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 03:13:03 +0100
From: Philip Ashmore
To: Philip Ashmore
According to the docs you mentioned, the script gets supplied th
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Srećko Jurić-Kavelj"
* Package name : libaria
Version: 2.7.5.2
Upstream Maintainer: Reed Hedges
* URL: http://robots.mobilerobots.com/wiki/ARIA
* License: GPLv2
Programming Lang : C++ with Python and J
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
We are looking for a developer / co-maintainer for apt-file.
The package description is:
apt-file is a command line tool for searching files contained in packages
for the APT packaging system. You can search in which package a file is
included or list the conten
I've seen a lot of cases over the years of packages depending on gawk
that do not need it. If you only need a standard nawk (new awk), you do
not need to depend on gawk. mawk is smaller and faster and sufficient
for almost all needs, and the existence of some awk on the system is
guaranteed by ba
Hola, mi nombre es Patricio Prieto Garay, soy de Mar de Ajo, Argentina y
pertenezco al Tuquito Team (www.tuquito.org.ar). Tuquito es una
distribucion Argentina nacida en Tucumán.
El tuquiGrub nace como una necesidad de restaurar el grub en forma rapida,
si por ejemplo una computadora tiene GNU/Lin
Hola Patricio,
Por favor, escriba en Inglés en debian-devel según lo sugerido por
nuestro código de conducta:
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
Por favor, lea esta introducción a mantener paquetes en Debian:
http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers
[Asking Patricio to write
Hello,
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 23:23:45 +
"brian m. carlson" wrote:
> I've seen a lot of cases over the years of packages depending on gawk
> that do not need it. If you only need a standard nawk (new awk), you
> do not need to depend on gawk. mawk is smaller and faster and
> sufficient for al
13 matches
Mail list logo
