Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
I am using this package a lot and like to (co) maintain.
I have good experiences in C, some less in Java but that wont be
a problem because I can catch up fast.
I maintain several smaller packages in Debian, so I have some
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Willem van den Akker
wrote:
> I am using this package a lot and like to (co) maintain.
> I have good experiences in C, some less in Java but that wont be
> a problem because I can catch up fast.
>
> I maintain several smaller packages in Debian, so I have some packa
"An obscure french DD". Wow, what a way to describe a person. Did that
person kill your pet squirrel or something? :-)
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> As the bug #70 mark was turned on February 7th 2013, Debian
> developers and contributors need yet another new chal
On 09/02/2013 08:38, Russ Allbery wrote:
> The proposal made in the Policy bug, which seems quite reasonable to me,
> is that we should only annotate packages with Built-Using if there are
> license implications to the inclusion of the source. Documenting things
> like libgcc.a that have explicit,
[Please don't top-post on Debian mailing-lists.]
On Sat, 2013-02-09 at 08:23 -0800, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
[...]
> > There is nothing to win but the pride of being the person who
> > predicted our bug report rate for the next months|years
On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 08:23:57 -0800
Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> "An obscure french DD". Wow, what a way to describe a person. Did that
> person kill your pet squirrel or something? :-)
Christian is referring to himself. He might have killed his own pet
squirrel - he hasn't said - but he's more likely
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 11:16:30PM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> On 09/02/2013 08:38, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > The proposal made in the Policy bug, which seems quite reasonable to me,
> > is that we should only annotate packages with Built-Using if there are
> > license implications to the inclusio
LOL. No, I did not. And I also didn't realize I did a reply-all :-D Sorry
guys and gals.
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Tyler MacDonald
> wrote:
> > "An obscure french DD". Wow, what a way to describe a person. Did that
> > person kill yo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tobias Hansen
* Package name: ratpoints
Version : 2.1.3
Upstream Author : Michael Stoll
* URL : http://www.mathe2.uni-bayreuth.de/stoll/programs/
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: C
Description : finding ratio
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 11:16:30PM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> On 09/02/2013 08:38, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > The proposal made in the Policy bug, which seems quite reasonable to me,
> > is that we should only annotate packages with Built-Using if there are
> > license implications to the inclusio
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jakub Wilk
Control: block -1 with 691699
* Package name: kmscon
Version : 6
Upstream Author : David Herrmann
* URL : https://github.com/dvdhrm/kmscon
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C
Description : Linux KMS/D
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Laurent Bigonville
* Package name: realmd
Version : 0.12
Upstream Author : Stef Walter
* URL : http://www.freedesktop.org/software/realmd/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : DBus service for confi
Package: wnpp
Followup-For: Bug #664092
Owner: Paul Johnson
Will upload to mentors.debian.net soon--packaging is done
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.or
Quoting Tyler MacDonald (ty...@macdonald.name):
> LOL. No, I did not. And I also didn't realize I did a reply-all :-D Sorry
> guys and gals.
As a punishment, you'll have to bet yourself, then.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
14 matches
Mail list logo
