On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 12:10:05PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> These packages include documentation licensed under GFDL with
> Invariant Sections or Cover Texts:
[..]
If I understand correctly, the way to go is to split every problematic source
package in two different source packages, one for main
* Serafeim Zanikolas , 2012-12-12, 10:30:
If I understand correctly, the way to go is to split every problematic
source package in two different source packages, one for main (shipping
programs) and another for non-free (shipping documentation), with the
main package suggesting the non-free one
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Alex 'AdUser' Z"
* Package name: fsniper
Version : 1.3.1
Upstream Author : Andrew Yates, David A. Foster
* URL : https://github.com/l3ib/fsniper
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: C
Description : daemon to run
Hi,
On 12.12.2012 13:50, Alex 'AdUser' Z wrote:
> fsniper is a lightweight daemon, that watches given set fo files and/or
> directories with inotify, and executes commands on inotify events.
> .
> This may be useful for seting up self-managed upload, temp or spool dirs.
How is this better/dif
Arno Töll wrote 2012-12-13 00:19:
Hi,
On 12.12.2012 13:50, Alex 'AdUser' Z wrote:
fsniper is a lightweight daemon, that watches given set fo files
and/or
directories with inotify, and executes commands on inotify events.
.
This may be useful for seting up self-managed upload, temp or spool
Arno Töll wrote (12 Dec 2012 13:19:14 GMT) :
> How is this better/different to incron(d) [1]?
We also have inoticoming to deal with the simplest case.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
A
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Serafeim Zanikolas , 2012-12-12, 10:30:
>
>> If I understand correctly, the way to go is to split every problematic
>> source package in two different source packages, one for main (shipping
>> programs) and another for non-free (shipping docu
Jakub Wilk writes:
> * Serafeim Zanikolas , 2012-12-12, 10:30:
>> If I understand correctly, the way to go is to split every problematic
>> source package in two different source packages, one for main (shipping
>> programs) and another for non-free (shipping documentation), with the
>> main pack
Svante Signell dijo [Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 09:52:36AM +0100]:
> Most people I meet (and installing Linux) choose to install some kind of
> Ubuntu distribution. At the same time the number of people installing
> Debian is declining as discussed here lately. Something has gone
> completely wrong with
Status update:
adplug
autoconf2.59
bash
cflow
cgdb
chromium-browser
cpio
ecl
gcc-4.7
gcc-h8300-hms
gcc-snapshot
gcj-4.7
gcl
gforth
gmerlin
gsl
gtypist
kbuild
kdesdk
libbinio
muse-el
readline6
source-highlight
tar
vcdimager
xemacs21-packages
I filed bugs against these:
http://bugs.debian.org/cg
Russ Allbery writes:
> Jakub Wilk writes:
>> First one should ask upstream if they are willing to relicense the
>> documentation. If they are not, then removing the documentation or
>> moving it into a non-free package is the only option left.
>
> It's worth noting that the FSF (which is the lar
On 12/12/2012 21:42, Alex Z wrote:
>
> Well, for me, killer features was (compared to incrond):
> * chain handlers (one event may have multiple handlers, which executes
> untill
> one returns zero code)
> * built-in filtering support:
> * file extension
> * mime-type
> * filename
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Didier Raboud
Package name: colobot
Version : Gold Pre-Alpha (git snapshot)
Upstream Author : Daniel Roux (EPSITEC) previously.
Now committers of https://github.com/colobot/
URL : https://colobot.info/wiki
13 matches
Mail list logo
