On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Hideki Yamane]
> > > henrich@hp:/tmp$ du -k Packages.*
> > > 6052 Packages.bz2
> > > 5812 Packages.xz
> > > henrich@hp:/tmp$ time bzip2 -d Packages.bz2
> > >
> > > real 0m0.999s
> > > user 0m0.956s
> > > sys 0m0.020s
> > >
tags 692614 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692619 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692624 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692625 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692627 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692628 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692629 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692630 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692631 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692613 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692615 + wheez
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> BTW, if systemd is a good design, why does it rely so heavily on
> socket-based activation, which has fundamentally unmaintainable security?
Please excuse the intrusion of a mere user, but I haven't heard that
one yet, can you elaborate?
* Neil McGovern , 2012-11-16, 15:46:
These bugs aren't gonna get fixed in time - tagging ignore
appropriately.
Excellent. Now Mr Crockford can say that his license is good enough for
Debian.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 04:58:45PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Neil McGovern , 2012-11-16, 15:46:
> >These bugs aren't gonna get fixed in time - tagging ignore
> >appropriately.
>
> Excellent. Now Mr Crockford can say that his license is good enough
> for Debian.
>
No he can't.
Neil
(Providing
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Neil McGovern , 2012-11-16, 15:46:
>
> These bugs aren't gonna get fixed in time - tagging ignore appropriately.
>>
>
> Excellent. Now Mr Crockford can say that his license is good enough for
> Debian.
I don't think our dear friend Mr. C
Jakub Wilk dijo [Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 04:58:45PM +0100]:
> * Neil McGovern , 2012-11-16, 15:46:
> >These bugs aren't gonna get fixed in time - tagging ignore
> >appropriately.
>
> Excellent. Now Mr Crockford can say that his license is good enough
> for Debian.
The bugs are tagged 'ignore' for on
Jakub Wilk writes:
> * Neil McGovern , 2012-11-16, 15:46:
>> These bugs aren't gonna get fixed in time - tagging ignore
>> appropriately.
> Excellent. Now Mr Crockford can say that his license is good enough for
> Debian.
Regardless of the accuracy of this statement (which other people have
alr
user j...@debian.org
usertags 692614 + good-not-evil
usertags 692619 + good-not-evil
usertags 692624 + good-not-evil
usertags 692625 + good-not-evil
usertags 692627 + good-not-evil
usertags 692628 + good-not-evil
usertags 692629 + good-not-evil
usertags 692630 + good-not-evil
usertags 692631 + good
+++ Jon Dowland [2012-11-16 19:41 +]:
> and please use usertags
> in future to collect together bugs under a single MBF.
Usertags are very flexible but rather undiscoverable.
I discovered this yesterday which lets you find out what users exist
and thus what tags:
http://udd.debian.org/cgi-b
On Thursday 15 November 2012 00.57.50 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> People are constantly insisting that systemd is too bloated or unreliable,
> but yet no one has really come up with real examples to prove that.
Hum, actually when i tried it, i couldn't halt or reboot my machine without an
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: python-webm
Version: 0.2.2
Upstream Author: Daniele Esposti
URL: https://code.google.com/p/python-webm
License: BSD-2-clause (modified)
Description: python interface to th
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 11:45:45PM +0100, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
> On Thursday 15 November 2012 00.57.50 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > People are constantly insisting that systemd is too bloated or unreliable,
> > but yet no one has really come up with real examples to prove that.
>
> Hum,
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
> On Thursday 15 November 2012 00.57.50 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> People are constantly insisting that systemd is too bloated or unreliable,
>> but yet no one has really come up with real examples to prove that.
>
> Hum, actually wh
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661239
>
> Hmm, that doesn't look like a valid bug report to me. Especially I
> don't see why dhclient would be able to disrupt systemd in such a way
> that you'd need to do a hard reboot.
I don't see why either (that makes it a bug and not a
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
>
>> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661239
>>
>> Hmm, that doesn't look like a valid bug report to me. Especially I
>> don't see why dhclient would be able to disrupt systemd in such a way
>> that you'd need to do a hard re
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: litecoin
Version: 0.6.3c
Upstream Author: Litecoin Developers
URL: https://github.com/litecoin-project/litecoin
License: MIT/X11, ISC
Description: peer-to-peer network base
> systemd reboots just fine. It also kills all processes just like sysvinit
> does.
Some help in "how to find the cause" would be much more appreciated and useful
than: "it's not happening, you were just dreaming that".
--
Salvo Tomaselli
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@list
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:37 AM, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Thomas Goirand [2012.11.14.0412 +0100]:
> > As Gentoo guys and some major kernel people are protesting about the
> > insanity Kay and Lennart have done to udev,
>
> I cannot help but notice that Kay and Lennart were both
> Gen
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012, Paul Wise wrote:
> > Maybe systemd is faster, but i think being unable to do a normal reboot
> > is an important drawback.
>
> systemd reboots just fine. It also kills all processes just like sysvinit
> does.
I have also had problems with systemd not rebooting as fast as sys
On 17.11.2012 03:43, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Nov 2012, Paul Wise wrote:
>>> Maybe systemd is faster, but i think being unable to do a normal reboot
>>> is an important drawback.
>>
>> systemd reboots just fine. It also kills all processes just like sysvinit
>> does.
>
> I have also had
Roger Leigh codelibre.net> writes:
> If you want a reliable system, you need a reliable PID 1.
yes. this was i believe why richard lightman implemented depinit
in i think it was under 1,000 lines of code. he was delighted
when i came up with a simple modification which would allow
him to remov
22 matches
Mail list logo
