* Marco d'Itri [2012-08-11 11:30]:
> We are not dismissing any other alternative, upstart still looks like
> an option.
> We are dismissing just openrc because its incremental benefits are
> trivial.
You don't speak on behalf of the debian project so please refrein from
using "we" - you don't
* Josselin Mouette [2012-08-10 13:27]:
> Le vendredi 10 août 2012 à 11:56 +0200, Martin Wuertele a écrit :
> > That we do no longer have glibc in the archive and we had a transition
> > to eglibc was an understandable maintainer decision.
>
> glibc/eglibc is not comparable to the other alternat
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 03:12:50PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I think Steve's point is that the goal is to make Debian technically
> excellent. Sometimes that means providing choice, and sometimes it
> doesn't. All things being equal, I think a system that's flexible is more
> technically excel
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 684479 general
Bug #684479 [wheezy] wheezy: Network File Services are major issue in Wheezy.
Warning: Unknown package 'wheezy'
Bug reassigned from package 'wheezy' to 'general'.
No longer marked as found in versions Wheezy.
Ignoring reque
Your message dated Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:19:47 +0200
with message-id <201208131119.48187.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line Re: Processed: Re: Bug#684479: wheezy: Network File Services
are major issue in Wheezy.
has caused the Debian Bug report #684479,
regarding wheezy: Network File Services a
On Aug 13, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Isn't forking udev something similar to working on mdev? How many people
No, you just have to look at the code bases and features set to
understand why.
> At many level, udev has been really annoying, breaking upgrades and so on.
I can't help with you being an
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jens Link
* Package name: nagibot
Version : 0.8.3
Upstream Author : Andreas Jobs, Robin Schroeder
* URL : http://nagibot.sourceforge.net/nagibot.html
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : Jabber bot
On 08/13/2012 05:20 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> As one wrote previously: mdev and OpenRC lack hostile upstreams! :)
>>
> They also lack solving large parts of the problem space.
>
I don't think anyone denies that fact. Hopefully, this will change.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
On 08/13/2012 03:44 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
> I did start the initial Debian
> packaging work last night though.
>
Is this available in a Git somewhere?
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 07:49:34PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 08/13/2012 03:44 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > I did start the initial Debian
> > packaging work last night though.
>
> Is this available in a Git somewhere?
It's here:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/openrc.git
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jens Link
* Package name: check_v46
Version :
Upstream Author : Ville Mattila
* URL : http://gitorious.org/nagios-monitoring-tools
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : Icinga / Nagios plugin for m
* Jens Link [2012-08-13 15:24]:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Jens Link
>
> * Package name: check_v46
> Version :
> Upstream Author : Ville Mattila
> * URL : http://gitorious.org/nagios-monitoring-tools
> * License : GPL
> Programming Lang:
* Martin Wuertele [2012-08-13 15:42]:
> * Jens Link [2012-08-13 15:24]:
>
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Jens Link
> >
> > * Package name: check_v46
> > Version :
> > Upstream Author : Ville Mattila
> > * URL : http://gitorious.org/nagios-moni
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 15:41 +0200, Martin Wuertele wrote:
> Would it make sense to included it in nagios-plugins-contrib?
Actually I'd prefer to have nagios-contrib split up... I mean I think
that's to some extent a general Debian problem, that there are such
package collections, with a high number
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Just to bring this back on topic, if the initial tests of OpenRC
> show it to be viable and that it's possible to upgrade seamlessly
> from sysv-rc, then I would propose to drop sysv-rc entirely, rather
> than having a choice here. OpenRC would be a replac
I don't know is this list a right place but I think it is good start point to
ask where proper place for my suggestion.
Sorry if I miss ((
I think that page:
http://www.debian.org/support
MUST be reorganised in this way:
* Make clarification on difference between official and non-official s
On 13.08.2012 00:50, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 12, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
>> Not good. Time to look a bit more seriously at mdev then?
> Waste of time, mdev lacks critical features like modules autoloading so
> it is laughable to argue that it is a credible udev replacement for
It is laughab
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniel Kahn Gillmor
* Package name: php-net-publicsuffix
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Daniel Kahn Gillmor
* URL : git://lair.fifthhorseman.net/~dkg/php-net-publicsuffix
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: PHP
Descri
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 5:07 AM, Oleksandr Gavenko wrote:
> I don't know is this list a right place but I think it is good start point to
> ask where proper place for my suggestion.
...
> Where is the right place for my suggestion?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.d
19 matches
Mail list logo
