On 2012-05-19 00:52 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 12:27:15PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
>> Guillem Jover wrote:
>> > Only as long as the debian/control information matches the one from
>> > the archive override.
>>
>> I checked, and currently the only base package with an ove
Julian Andres Klode writes:
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 04:06:23PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> FWIW
>>
>> posted on the wiki: http://wiki.debian.org/RepositoryFormat
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Michal
>
> I have now documented the Contents indices and the diffs
> as well, mostly (sans the exact form
Xueqian (19/05/2012):
> Package: general
> Severity: important
>
> Recently, I have upgrade packages xorg, xserver-xorg,
> xserver-xorg-input-all and x11-common from 7.6+12 to 7.6+13.
See “Follow-up with more info” on:
http://x.debian.net/howto/report-bugs.html
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
De
Adam Borowski writes:
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 09:24:04AM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>> On 05/17/2012 04:52 PM, Gergely Nagy wrote:
>> >> I'm confused concerning the above; the point of a VCS in this context is
>> >> to
>> >> track changes to the source package, and the patches are themselves
Do I need to attach those info and reply to this list or do I need to
re-submit another report?
Thanks.
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 09:21:59AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Xueqian (19/05/2012):
> > Package: general
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Recently, I have upgrade packages xorg, xserve
Adam Borowski writes:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 07:45:24PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Charles Plessy writes:
>>
>> > Also, it is very sad that, as a project, we can not decide whether we go
>> > for 3.0 (git) or not, or have a concrete list of resolvable objections
>> > from the people whose
On 19/05/12 06:34, Liang Guo wrote:
> One of my packages [1] failed to build on armel, kfreebsd and hurd,
> But I don't have such a machine to test my packages. Is it possible
> to use debian porterbox to build the package and dig into this
> problem ?
The problem on armel:
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-li
Neil Williams writes:
> On Fri, 18 May 2012 14:34:40 +0100
> "Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo" wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2012/5/18 Daniel Leidert :
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Our bug tracker contains items for packages, which do (not longer) exist.
>> > What should happen to them? I see, that it might be a
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Colin Tuckley wrote:
>
> The problem on armel:
>
> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.6/../../../arm-linux-gnueabi/libpciaccess.so:
> undefined reference to `gzopen64@ZLIB_1.2.3.3'
>
> Looks like it might be the same problem as mentioned here:
>
> http://forums.fedor
Thibaut Paumard writes:
> Hi,
>
> Le 18/05/12 13:46, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
>>> This works only for the special case that "build" does not change any
>>> source file. Otherwise you would also commit the changed source files.
>>
>> And it better not. There is no excuse for changing source
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Aron Xu wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Colin Tuckley wrote:
>>
>> The problem on armel:
>>
>> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.6/../../../arm-linux-gnueabi/libpciaccess.so:
>> undefined reference to `gzopen64@ZLIB_1.2.3.3'
>>
>> Looks like it might be t
* Paul Wise [120519 01:39]:
> I would like to see the flat-style repository documented too, since
> some of the derivatives in the Debian derivatives census use it and I
> would like to lint their apt repositories.
I my humble opinion the best documentation for the "flat-style" format
is: "don't
debian-de...@liska.ath.cx (Olе Streicher) writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow writes:
>> debian-de...@liska.ath.cx (Olõ Streicher) writes:
>>> James McCoy writes:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:23:05PM +0200, Olõ Streicher wrote:
> Unpatching the sources *before* the build process was cle
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 673505 xserver-xorg
Bug #673505 [general] general: xorg and xserver-xorg 7.6+13 always made X and
gnome-shell dead
Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'xserver-xorg'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #673505 to the sa
On Vi, 18 mai 12, 14:34:40, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>
> So I wouldn't blindly close those bug reports, and that's why I'm
> triaging and handling them in my spare time.
Do you know how to retrieve those bugs with querybts(1) other than by
individual bug number?
Kind regards,
Andrei
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
* Package name: puppetdb
Version : 0.9.0
Upstream Author : Puppet Labs
* URL : http://docs.puppetlabs.com/puppetdb/0.9/
* License : Apache 2.0
Programming Lang: Clojure
Description : Puppet
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 07:38:59AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
>
> > What's the opinion about the flat repository format, where you
> > just have one directory with Release, Packages, Sources, and
> > friends and no sub-directories?
> >
>
Hello,
This package is only avaible for squeeze and sid, is it normal ?
I have dist-upgrade my server from squeeze to wheezy and my php won't
run and send a lot of mail via cron to me.
Like this:
PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library
'/usr/lib/php5/20100525+lfs/suhosin.so'
Alain SAURAT (19/05/2012):
> This package is only avaible for squeeze and sid, is it normal ?
Yes, see:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/php-suhosin/news/20120320T163911Z.html
> I have dist-upgrade my server from squeeze to wheezy and my php
> won't run and send a lot of mail via cron to me.
B
On Sat, 19 May 2012, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> The BTS could then not just track the binary/source package of a bug
> but also the meta-source package. That way when gcc-4.4 is removed
> from the archive the bugs can still be associated with the gcc-x.y
> meta package and won't be completly los
Hi,
(Corsac was right, you'd better CC the maintainers with whom you want to
discuss...)
On Wed, 16 May 2012, Russell Coker wrote:
> Would it be possible to have somewhere on the Debian servers for storing such
> files so that they can be referenced in a README file or something rather
> than
2012/5/19 Andrei POPESCU :
> On Vi, 18 mai 12, 14:34:40, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>>
>> So I wouldn't blindly close those bug reports, and that's why I'm
>> triaging and handling them in my spare time.
>
> Do you know how to retrieve those bugs with querybts(1) other than by
> individua
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gunnar Wolf
* Package name: ruby-file-tail
Version : 1.0.8
Upstream Author : Florian Frank
* URL : http://www.ping.de/~flori
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : Ruby library for following still
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gunnar Wolf
* Package name: ruby-sourcify
Version : 0.5.0
Upstream Author : NgTzeYang
* URL : http://github.com/ngty/sourcify
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : Extract a Ruby class or method'
Hi...
On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 15:10 +0200, Alain SAURAT wrote:
> This package is only avaible for squeeze and sid, is it normal ?
In addition to what Cyril already mentioned, see also
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=663954
Cheers,
Chris.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptograph
On Sb, 19 mai 12, 15:48:46, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>
> I don't know much about querybts, but you can ask for all [unarchived,
> I think] bugs in package emacs21, for example:
For that you would have to know the "package" the bug was reported
against.
> Hopefully somebody more kno
* Jon Dowland:
> So if I understand the situation correctly; wordpress ships a pre-build binary
> which cannot be generated in Debian? Whether the source is in a separate
> package or not, this does not feel right.
It's not without precedent. Ocaml bootstraps off a binary blob to
avoid a cyclic
Most new PCs have an Intel or AMD 64-bit processor, and
popcon.debian.org shows amd64 numbers almost matching i386.
For some time we have also provided the amd64 kernel for i386, identical
in all but the package metadata. This has not always been perfectly
compatible with i386 userland, but split
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: John Millikin
* Package name: haskell-patience
Version : 0.1.1
Upstream Author : Keegan McAllister
* URL : http://hackage.haskell.org/package/patience
* License : 3-clause BSD
Programming Lang: Haskell
Description
Hi Ben,
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 03:16:15AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Most new PCs have an Intel or AMD 64-bit processor, and
> popcon.debian.org shows amd64 numbers almost matching i386.
> So in wheezy I would like to see:
> 1. Default architecture (top of the list for installation media/manu
On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 19:44 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 03:16:15AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Most new PCs have an Intel or AMD 64-bit processor, and
> > popcon.debian.org shows amd64 numbers almost matching i386.
>
> > So in wheezy I would like to see:
On May 20, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Then in wheezy+1:
> 3. amd64 kernel flavour for i386 dropped.
Why can't we use the multiarch package in wheezy?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
32 matches
Mail list logo
