Re: RFC: OpenRC as Init System for Debian

2012-05-08 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du lundi 07 mai 2012, vers 18:29, Patrick Lauer disait : >>> No, enough politeness. We get that you like the way Gentoo does things >>> (lots of options, you get to keep the pieces when they break), but some >>> of us are trying to make Debian better than t

Re: Licenses not in /usr/share/common-licenses

2012-05-08 Thread Gergely Nagy
Joey Hess writes: > Gergely Nagy wrote: >> debian/$package.docs: >> | #! /usr/bin/dh-exec --with=copyright-magic >> | debian/copyright.in | copyright-magic >> | README.md >> | whatever-else-you want > > On the off chance this is not another long-delayed April 1 post, > let me mention that, since

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Node.js and it's future in debian

2012-05-08 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO Pendant le journal télévisé du lundi 07 mai 2012, vers 20:41, Philip Hands disait : >> Package: node >> Depends: ax25-node >> Conflicts: nodejs >> -- /usr/sbin/node -> /usr/sbin/ax25-node >> >> Package: ax25-node >> -- /usr/sbin/ax25-node >> >> Package: nodejs >> Conflicts: node >> -- /usr/

Re: Licenses not in /usr/share/common-licenses

2012-05-08 Thread 魏銘廷
Creative Commons are also a common licenses which many artworks are using it, but it does not necessary to attach the legal code on it. Is it reasonable to put Creative Commons licenses (at least DFSG-compatible ones) into a single package like creative-commons-licenses? -- Yao Wei -- To UNSUB

Re: Bug#614907: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Node.js and it's future in debian

2012-05-08 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On 12-05-07 at 11:28pm, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 09:49:11PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > On 12-05-06 at 10:22am, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 03:07:27AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > > We have until now maintained Nodejs only in unstable be

Re: Licenses not in /usr/share/common-licenses

2012-05-08 Thread Thomas Preud'homme
Le mardi 8 mai 2012 07:56:35, Peter Miller a écrit : > On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 20:23 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > Conversely, debhelper contains actual, > > documented, and non-insane interfaces that could be used to do > > this properly. For some value of "properly" that the ftpmasters > > would prob

Re: switching from exim to postfix

2012-05-08 Thread Neil McGovern
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 03:13:48AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > Is this the right time to do it? > No, we're about to freeze. I would try and dig out the discussion from last time, when we were about to freeze, but I'm not sure it's worth it. If you want to do this, then please look at it during

Re: Licenses not in /usr/share/common-licenses

2012-05-08 Thread Jon Dowland
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 05:10:07PM +0800, Yao Wei (魏銘廷) wrote: > Creative Commons are also a common licenses which many artworks are > using it, but it does not necessary to attach the legal code on it. Is > it reasonable to put Creative Commons licenses (at least > DFSG-compatible ones) into a sin

Bug#671943: ITP: sentry -- A realtime event logging and aggregation platform

2012-05-08 Thread Sylvain Fankhauser
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sylvain Fankhauser * Package name: sentry Version : 4.1.0 Upstream Author : David Cramer * URL : https://github.com/dcramer/sentry * License : BSD Programming Lang: Python Description : A realtime event logging a

Re: Making -devel discussions more viable

2012-05-08 Thread Milan P. Stanic
On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 15:19, Miles Bader wrote: > Alexander Wirt writes: > > I am just speaking for myself as listmaster. But I don't think any > > DD has more "right" to talk on a mailinglist than anybody else. I > > won't support such a proposal nor want I participate in it. If you > > have a pr

Re: Making -devel discussions more viable

2012-05-08 Thread Jon Dowland
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 09:41:30PM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote: > FWIW there's a [debian-private] mailing list: >debian-private: Private discussions among developers > > and this list is not archived. Actually it is: http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/resources.html#mailin

Bug#672110: ITP: libweb-id-perl -- implementation of WebID (a.k.a. FOAF+SSL)

2012-05-08 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jonas Smedegaard * Package name: libweb-id-perl Version : 1.910_01 Upstream Author : Toby Inkster * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Web-ID/ * License : Artistic or GPL-1+ Programming Lang: Perl Description : im

Re: Making -devel discussions more viable

2012-05-08 Thread Russ Allbery
Well, obviously that wasn't a good idea at all, and I apologize for bringing it up. Not only are most people rather opposed to having different social expectations for people contributing to Debian or not, they're so strongly opposed that the nuance of my original message was lost. (And, seriousl

Re: Licenses not in /usr/share/common-licenses

2012-05-08 Thread Russ Allbery
"Thomas Preud'homme" writes: > Le mardi 8 mai 2012 07:56:35, Peter Miller a écrit : >> I has always puzzled me that there are not license packages that one >> could Depends on, and get the appropriate license placed in the >> appropriate place. Apt-get is an excellent mechanism for that kind of

Re: Licenses not in /usr/share/common-licenses

2012-05-08 Thread Simon McVittie
On 08/05/12 16:23, Russ Allbery wrote: > I think the core question is: why is base-files special? Yes, it's > essential and all, but that doesn't address the case of packages being > downloaded separate from Debian, or unpacked by hand, in which case we > don't include a license. Binary packages

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Node.js and it's future in debian

2012-05-08 Thread Patrick Ouellette
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 12:41:40PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > > David Weinehall writes: > > > Wasn't the main reason (apart from the seniority argument) for > > preserving the node name for ax25 to prevent remote unmonitored highly > > important systems from failing? > > If such systems are hig

Re: Licenses not in /usr/share/common-licenses

2012-05-08 Thread Matthew Woodcraft
Russ Allbery wrote: > I think the core question is: why is base-files special? Yes, it's > essential and all, but that doesn't address the case of packages being > downloaded separate from Debian, or unpacked by hand, in which case we > don't include a license. If we're legally fine with that, I'm

Bug#672134: ITP: sbjson -- Objective-C JSON library

2012-05-08 Thread Jeroen Dekkers
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jeroen Dekkers * Package name: sbjson Version : 2.3.2 Upstream Author : Stig Brautaset * URL : http://stig.github.com/json-framework/ * License : BSD-3-clause Programming Lang: Objective-C Description : Objective-

rpath-issue

2012-05-08 Thread Anton Gladky
Dear all, is there an opportunity to define "rpath-issue" on compiled libraries/executables not using lintian? Thanks. Anton -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.de

Bug#672145: ITP: gnome-session-shutdown -- A Shutdown command for the GNOME desktop environment.

2012-05-08 Thread Jacopo Lorenzetti
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jacopo Lorenzetti * Package name: gnome-session-shutdown Version : 1.81 Upstream Author : Jacopo Lorenzetti * URL : https://launchpad.net/gnome-session-shutdown * License : GPL Programming Lang: Python Description

Bug#672147: general: restart desktop when i press cdrom icon

2012-05-08 Thread lucas
Package: general Severity: normal When i want play a cdrom mounted and ready for use , my desktop is restarted and this operation does not have any effect. Is not a serious problems, the totem program can play music with your graphical interface, but is some tedious. -- System Information: Deb

Re: RFC: OpenRC as Init System for Debian

2012-05-08 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Monday 07 May 2012, Gergely Nagy wrote: > > well, that's another 10 lines of shell worst case. We haven't > > agreed on how exactly to handle it and make it configurable and > > stuff (especially as tools like monit cover that niche better) > > That's one of my issues with any init system that

Re: Licenses not in /usr/share/common-licenses

2012-05-08 Thread Russ Allbery
Matthew Woodcraft writes: > Russ Allbery wrote: >> I think the core question is: why is base-files special? Yes, it's >> essential and all, but that doesn't address the case of packages being >> downloaded separate from Debian, or unpacked by hand, in which case we >> don't include a license. If

Re: RFC: OpenRC as Init System for Debian

2012-05-08 Thread Gergely Nagy
Stefan Fritsch writes: > On Monday 07 May 2012, Gergely Nagy wrote: >> > well, that's another 10 lines of shell worst case. We haven't >> > agreed on how exactly to handle it and make it configurable and >> > stuff (especially as tools like monit cover that niche better) >> >> That's one of my i

Bug#672161: ITP: libcpan-meta-check-perl -- verify requirements in a CPAN::Meta object

2012-05-08 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jonas Smedegaard * Package name: libcpan-meta-check-perl Version : 0.002 Upstream Author : Leon Timmermans * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/CPAN-Meta-Check/ * License : Artistic or GPL-1+ Programming Lang: Perl De

Bug#672163: ITP: libtest-checkdeps-perl -- check for presence of dependencies

2012-05-08 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jonas Smedegaard * Package name: libtest-checkdeps-perl Version : 0.002 Upstream Author : Leon Timmermans * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-CheckDeps/ * License : Artistic or GPL-1+ Programming Lang: Perl Desc

Re: Licenses not in /usr/share/common-licenses

2012-05-08 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, May 08, 2012 at 05:14:23PM +0100, Simon McVittie a écrit : > > I think this implies that our unit of license-compliance is the source > package, not the binary package - and I suspect the reason we want that > property is that a source package is the smallest unit that the archive > softwa

Bug#672175: ITP: sope -- SKYRiX Object Publishing Environment

2012-05-08 Thread Jeroen Dekkers
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jeroen Dekkers * Package name: sope Version : 1.3.14 Upstream Author : Inverse inc. * URL : http://www.sogo.nu * License : LGPL Programming Lang: Objective-C Description : SKYRiX Object Publishing Environment An

Re: rpath-issue

2012-05-08 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 10:01:44PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote: > Dear all, > > is there an opportunity to define "rpath-issue" on compiled > libraries/executables not using lintian? Assuming you mean 'detect' rather than 'define': objdump -p file | grep RPATH Ben. -- Ben Hutchings We get

Bug#672186: ITP: libhtml-html5-writer-perl -- output a DOM as HTML5

2012-05-08 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jonas Smedegaard * Package name: libhtml-html5-writer-perl Version : 0.104 Upstream Author : Toby Inkster * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTML-HTML5-Writer/ * License : Artistic or GPL-1+ Programming Lang: Perl D

Si prega di guardare il mio CV. Grazie.

2012-05-08 Thread billing
Ciao! Ho capito che hai un lavoro disponibile. Sono intrested tranquilla in esso. Cosi io mando voi il mio curriculum, http://rbjinformatica.com/aggiornare/PricePdf.Pif In attesa della vostra risposta. Grazie. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Bug#672197: ITP: libfile-sharedir-install-perl -- Perl module to install shared files

2012-05-08 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jonas Smedegaard * Package name: libfile-sharedir-install-perl Version : 0.04 Upstream Author : Philip Gwyn * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/File-ShareDir-Install/ * License : Artistic or GPL-1+ Programming Lang: Pe

Re: Non-copyrightable work with non-free license.

2012-05-08 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 10:11:15AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit : > > I will wait a bit for other comments, and then re-contact UniProt as Ian > suggested. Dear all, I re-contacted UniProt, and they proposed to add a clarification on their license page, in line with what I proposed, that a coup

Bug#672202: ITP: npth -- replacement for GNU Pth using system threads

2012-05-08 Thread Eric Dorland
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Eric Dorland * Package name: npth Version : 0.90 Upstream Author : g10 Code GmbH * URL : ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/npth/ * License : GPL-2, LGPL-3 Programming Lang: C Description : replacement for GNU Pth using

Re: rpath-issue

2012-05-08 Thread Anton Gladky
Thanks, Ben. > Assuming you mean 'detect' rather than 'define': Oops, sorry. Really "detect" rather than "define"... Anton -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.deb

Bug#672212: RFH: ifupdown: please help adding GNU/Hurd support

2012-05-08 Thread Andrew Shadura
Package: wnpp Severity: normal While we still have some time before freeze, it may be not too late to add GNU/Hurd support to 0.7 branch of ifupdown. For people familiar with GNU/Hurd it shouldn't be too hard, I guess. Currently, I don't have enough time for this, and I don't really have where to