> There's some obscure bug in the upstream src/Makefile.am though--it's
> missing libcryptsetup and OpenSSL libs when linking, which causes
> link failures. The actual Makefile looks like it's correct though,
> so not sure what's wrong. If anyone who uses is wants to fix that,
> that's all (I thi
Hi Paul,
Am Tue, 20 Dec 2011 09:12:13 +0800
schrieb Paul Wise :
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 5:24 AM, Andreas Rütten wrote:
>
> > I assume the "tags as .tar.gz" feature is something special from
> > github. Or could I use also tags from e.g. git.debian.de in a
> > watchfile?
>
> git.debian.de doe
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: oliv...@biniou.info
Package name: extsmail
Version : 1.4
Upstream Author : Laurence Tratt
URL : http://tratt.net/laurie/src/extsmail/
License : BSD, MIT
Programming Lang: C
Description : enables the robust
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:11:39AM +0100, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Roger Leigh wrote:
[..]
Regarding the objections above, which are primarily concerned with the
creation of a non-generic initramfs, how does this alternative suggestion
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 01:17:41PM +0100, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
>
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:11:39AM +0100, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
> >>On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >>
> >>[..]
> >>>
> >>>Regarding the objections above, which are primarily concer
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Antoine Beaupré"
* Package name: lico-update
Version : 0.3.17
Upstream Author : Alexander Mieland (Leader and Manager of The New Linux
Counter Project)
* URL : https://linuxcounter.net/
* License : GPL-2
Programming
Hi,
I've found this program (http://jan.kneschke.de/projects/pxtools/) very
useful for my work, and its license is compatible with debian rules, so I
believe it would be a great idea to package it and preserver for the future.
Regards.
--
Felix
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jordi Mallach
* Package name: hunspell-an
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Santiago Paricio
Juan Pablo Martínez
* URL :
https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/downloads/file/136466/corrector_ortografico_aragones-0
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 06:06:45PM +0100, Suco wrote:
> Hi,
> I've found this program (http://jan.kneschke.de/projects/pxtools/) very
> useful for my work, and its license is compatible with debian rules, so I
> believe it would be a great idea to package it and preserver for the future.
This is
With recent dpkg(-source) changes, many packages are again failing to
build twice in a row, because of uncommitted upstream changes. Fixing
this was a lenny release goal, maybe it should be one again?!? Most
importantly, maybe someone who has access to one of those build grids
can run the old tes
On 20/12/11 at 22:01 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> With recent dpkg(-source) changes, many packages are again failing to
> build twice in a row, because of uncommitted upstream changes. Fixing
> this was a lenny release goal, maybe it should be one again?!? Most
> importantly, maybe someone wh
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 09:36:47PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 20/12/11 at 22:01 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > With recent dpkg(-source) changes, many packages are again failing to
> > build twice in a row, because of uncommitted upstream changes. Fixing
> > this was a lenny release goa
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request assistance with maintaining the line6-usb package.
The package description is:
An experimental driver for the guitar amp, cab, and effects modeller
PODxt Pro by Line6 (and similar devices), supporting the following features:
.
* Reading/writing indivi
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:33:26PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 21:23:49 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Boost 1.48 was uploaded to sid about 9 days ago so it should
> > transition to "testing" in the next day or so.
> >
> > My plan is to update the def
* Darren Salt schrieb:
> I fully intend to continue with lilo, separate /usr and no initramfs/initrd.
> I *may* decide to stop using a separate /usr should I need to replace
> hardware ??? but probably not before then.
>
> I will NOT use an initramfs just to have /usr mounted early enough.
Seco
15 matches
Mail list logo