Hi all,
I guess this is already well-know but if I packaged with
pbuilder, which should be normal way, an upload to Debian
archives was rejected by failing to "dpkg-source -x".
And in fact when I do manually "dpkg-source -x" it failed.
What am I doing wrong?
Best regards, 2011
Hi all,
I built and uploaded test package of lynx-cur in experimental
(2.8.8dev.8-2 and 2.8.8dev.9-1 today).
I changed packaging enormously so I'm afraid I made some
silly mistakes. If possible, please check and test it.
Main changes I made are, dropping lynx-cur-wrapper and so
dropping also alt
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 22:07:30 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jun 2011, Ted Dunning wrote:
> > > Ted Dunning writes:
> > >> There has been a bit of talk about Apache Zookeeper recently by Thomas
> > >> Koch. He has a bad opinion of Zookeeper and things it is "not good
> > >
Hi,
in the Haskell packaging we have made a mistake that we want to
work-around without having to sourcefully upload 230 packages.
Eventually, we will have to do these uploads anyways (with the next
major ghc release), so the work-around will not be in place forever.
Here is the situation:
A has
Hi,
Drs. Jeffrey Carver, Rosanna Guadagno, Debra McCallum, and Mr. Amiangshu
Bosu, University of Alabama, and Dr. Lorin Hochstein, University of
Southern California, are conducting a survey of open-source software
developers. This survey seeks to understand how developers on distributed,
virtual
Saludos compañeras y compañeros, este correo les ha sido enviado para
proponerles el desarrollo de
una Distribución GNU/Linux llamada «Anarchy-GNU/Linux», con el eslogán
«Freedom and solidarity
not only in the software, also in the society for a better world without
state and capitalism» (Libertad
-- Mensaje reenviado --
De: wakiko s
Fecha: 13 de junio de 2011 11:39
Asunto: Proyecto y creación de Anarchy-Gnu/Linux
Para: anarchist...@yahoo.co.uk, debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
debian-annou...@lists.debian.org, debian-u...@lists.debian.org,
debian-proj...@lists.debian.org, lis
On Du, 12 iun 11, 21:44:37, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>
> #602694 needs to stay open and blocking zookeeper from Squeeze until it
> has a maintainer team that is confident they will be able to handle the
> stable support and also confident that the package is good enough
> (actually that
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alessio Treglia
* Package name: jalv
Version : 0~svn3395
Upstream Author : David Robillard
* URL : http://dev.drobilla.net/browser/trunk/jalv
* License : ISC
Programming Lang: C
Description : tool to run LV2 plug
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 12 iun 11, 21:44:37, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > #602694 needs to stay open and blocking zookeeper from Squeeze until it
> > has a maintainer team that is confident they will be able to handle the
> > stable support and also confident t
Hi,
I'm not sure whether this is the appropriate mailing list for the subject or
not. If not, please let me know the right place for this discussion.
There are a few features that would probably improve Debian's package Management
system (at least based on my needs). And maybe they exist somewher
Joachim Breitner wrote:
> it seems you forgot to push the tag for haskell-safe.
Sorry Joachim,
It wasn't me. Although I did the last commit, I didn't do the
package upload as I am only a DM, not a DD.
Cheers,
Erik
--
--
Erik d
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 01:26:02AM +0430, Eliad Bagherzadegan wrote:
> I'm not sure whether this is the appropriate mailing list for the subject or
> not. If not, please let me know the right place for this discussion.
>
> There are a few features that would probably improve Debian's package
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 01:26:02AM +0430, Eliad Bagherzadegan wrote:
[...]
> This program should periodically check the bug tracking system for
> bugs in installed packages and report to the system administrator.
[...]
While not necessarily a perfect match for the criteria you mention,
you'll prob
Op Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:26:02 +0430
schreef Eliad Bagherzadegan :
> 2. The ability to ban certain packages and (possibly) there dependent
> packages. So that they wouldn't show up in the package manager at all.
You can do something like this using apt pinning. If you assign a
negative priority to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Francis Russell
* Package name: pwsafe
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Nicolas S. Dade
* URL : http://nsd.dyndns.org/pwsafe/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : command-line application for man
Ļoti labs sporta uzturs no izcilākajiem Ziemeļamerikas ražotājiem!
Tas ir sporta uzturs pamanāmiem sasniegumiem. Turklāt nesit pa kabatu!
meklē to visu tajā vietā: http://eihahho.notlong.com
Patricija
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsub
Hello,
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:25:29 +0200
Peter De Wachter wrote:
> You can do something like this using apt pinning. If you assign a
> negative priority to a package, it will still be listed but apt will
> refuse to install it.
> For example, with the following stanza apt will refuse to instal
"Andrew O. Shadoura" writes:
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:25:29 +0200
> Peter De Wachter wrote:
>
>> You can do something like this using apt pinning. If you assign a
>> negative priority to a package, it will still be listed but apt will
>> refuse to install it.
>
>> For example, with the following
Hello,
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 07:44:43 +0200
Gergely Nagy wrote:
> >> You can do something like this using apt pinning. If you assign a
> >> negative priority to a package, it will still be listed but apt
> >> will refuse to install it.
> >
> >> For example, with the following stanza apt will refus
20 matches
Mail list logo
