Hi Josselin,
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I have prepared a quick and dirty implementation for my rolling release
> proposal[1].
Where are the sources ? :)
> The APT lines you need are the following:
> deb http://your.favorite.mirror/ testing main contrib non-free
> deb htt
> I have noticed several times package changes like the following (from
> cairomm entering testing today):
> * debian/control:
> - Drop build dependencies on doxygen and graphviz, since upstream
> now ships the generated documentation
Definitely not the prefered thing to do, imo.
>
On 11-06-05 at 05:39am, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 21:54:11 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> >What I do is use upstream provided tarballs, then put aside
> >autotools-generated files, then autogenerate myself, and in the clean
> >rule put back the upstream-provided files (becau
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nicolas CANIART
* Package name: python-sphinx-aafig
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Leandro Lucarella
* URL : http://pypi.python.org/sphinxcontrib-aafig/
* License : BOLA
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Em
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
* Package name: libhtml-html5-microdata-parser-perl
Version : 0.031
Upstream Author : Toby Inkster
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTML-HTML5-Microdata-Parser/
* License : Artistic or GPL-1+
Progra
Heyho,
just to inform you: lintian 2.5.0 (via backports) is on ftp-master. As
such that one is doing the autorejects now, so whatever you do, you want
to check against it.
While doing this, there have been some small changes to the autoreject
tag list:
non-fatal:
- embedded-zlib
+ embedded-libra
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 08:29 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> On 06/04/11 19:01, Neil Williams wrote:
> >
> > Testing compatibility is the larger problem. Automated tests can only
> > go so far. Dependencies are one thing, bugs which arise because one
> > setup is using a version which h
Hi,
I have currently the problem that I have to use large, computing intensive
applications [1,2]. These are usually implemented in many source files. I used
in the past pseudo c files which include all other c files [3]. Of course,
this is a hack and don't work in many situation due to conflic
Le dimanche 05 juin 2011 à 10:31 +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> Where are the sources ? :)
I’m somehow ashamed to share such crappy code, but it’s on
ries:/home/joss/rolling/make_rolling.py
> > The APT lines you need are the following:
> > deb http://your.favorite.mirror/ testing main cont
* Nicolas CANIART , 2011-06-05, 12:06:
* Package name: python-sphinx-aafig
Why such a package name? It's neither the upstream name
(sphinxcontrib-aafig) nor policy-compliant[0] name for the binary
package (python-sphinxcontrib-aafig).
* URL : http://pypi.python.org/sphinxco
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 11-06-05 at 05:39am, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> > On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 21:54:11 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > >What I do is use upstream provided tarballs, then put aside
> > >autotools-generated files, then autogenerate myself, and in the clean
>
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 01:59:57PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 05 juin 2011 à 10:31 +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> > Where are the sources ? :)
>
> I’m somehow ashamed to share such crappy code, but it’s on
> ries:/home/joss/rolling/make_rolling.py
>
> > > The APT lines you
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: The Ayatana Packagers
* Package name: indicator-datetime
Version : 0.2.3
Upstream Author : Ted Gould
* URL : https://launchpad.net/indicator-datetime
* License : GPL-2+, GPL-3, public-domain
Programming Lang: C
Descr
On 11-06-05 at 09:48am, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Jun 2011, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > On 11-06-05 at 05:39am, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> > > On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 21:54:11 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > >What I do is use upstream provided tarballs, then put aside
> > > >aut
Hi,
A few days ago, we had a discussion about a packaging-dev meta package.
The responses were between neutral and positive. Therefore I created a
initial draft [1] and tried to incorporate all suggestions made in the
discussion.
The list looks currently like this:
Depends: build-essential,
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 15:46:44 +0200
Benjamin Drung wrote:
> A few days ago, we had a discussion about a packaging-dev meta package.
> This package is just for packaging, not for developing. So gdb, pylint
> and co. won't go into it. This package should be installed by packagers.
> No other packag
Am Sonntag, den 05.06.2011, 15:11 +0100 schrieb Neil Williams:
> On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 15:46:44 +0200
> Benjamin Drung wrote:
>
> > A few days ago, we had a discussion about a packaging-dev meta package.
>
> > This package is just for packaging, not for developing. So gdb, pylint
> > and co. won't
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kouhei Maeda
* Package name: python-sphinx-seqdiag
Version : 0.1.1
Upstream Author : Takeshi Komiya
* URL : http://bitbucket.org/birkenfeld/sphinx-contrib
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description : S
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 05.06.2011, 11:03 +0200 schrieb Joerg Jaspert:
> You need to ensure that (package in main. contrib/non-free are
> different)
>
> - you can build everything you ship inside main,
> - the thing you ship in your package is what the shipped source will
>end up producing when
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 16:49:14 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/signed
>
> if I do regenerate the files for shipping (or don’t ship them in the
> binary packages), is it ok to leave the upstream-generated files in
> the .orig.tar.gz, even though I have no hard guarantee that
[Joachim Breitner]
> if I do regenerate the files for shipping (or don’t ship them in the
> binary packages), is it ok to leave the upstream-generated files in
> the .orig.tar.gz, even though I have no hard guarantee that they are
> built from these sources (assuming I have no reason to assume tha
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 05:07:26PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> About the package set dependencies: The core package sets would be
> self contained, i.e. they would not depend upon packages outside of
> their own core set. The new main/testing repository would be meant
> to work with both core/st
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 11-06-05 at 09:48am, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Sun, 05 Jun 2011, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > On 11-06-05 at 05:39am, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 21:54:11 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > > >What I do is use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/05/11 13:17, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 08:29 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>>
>> Understood. If you reduce the number of packages to be released by
>> focusing on a core package set with 1000 or 1500 packages instead
>> of
* Harald Dunkel [110605 18:02]:
> Only core/stable should be released. The "rest" comes from
> main/testing.
>
> I cannot speak for others, but I don't wait 3 years. I do
> regular updates/upgrades to include the most recent security
> and bug fixes. We've scheduled regular maintenance weekends
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kouhei Maeda
* Package name: python-actdiag
Version : 0.1.5
Upstream Author : Takeshi Komiya
* URL : https://bitbucket.org/tk0miya/actdiag
* License : Apache
Programming Lang: Python
Description : generate activ
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 08:29:03 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
...
> My virtualization servers themselves were running testing, too, but
> since Squeeze has been released testing is changing rapidly. Currently
> I cannot rely upon testing for server installations.
So use stable + backports for now, and
Hi.
Le samedi 04 juin 2011 à 20:46 +0200, Zygmunt Krynicki a écrit :
>
> I wrote dh_splitpackage, a helper script that unambiguously splits the
> files of a binary package into multiple packages based on a
> configuration file.
>
Uh... Maybe I missed the point of this tool which was obvious
Hi,
Philip Hands writes:
> On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 08:29:03 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Your pipe-dream of an effortless, stable, and up to date system is just
> that -- pick any two.
I personally prefer stable system with unstable chroot. This gives me
best of both worlds. I can use both stable
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 10:31 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi Josselin,
>
> On Sun, 05 Jun 2011, Josselin Mouette wrote:
[...]
> > Don’t rush! Currently the rolling archive is empty. The first task is to
> > fill it. Therefore I’m now looking for people who are running testing on
> > their machin
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 18:02 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> I cannot speak for others, but I don't wait 3 years. I do
> regular updates/upgrades to include the most recent security
> and bug fixes. We've scheduled regular maintenance weekends
> every 3 months for this. Important updates are installed
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Greg Sharp
* Package name: plastimatch
Version : 1.5
Upstream Author : Greg Sharp
* URL : http://plastimatch.org/
* License : BSD-style
Programming Lang: C, C++
Description : medical image reconstruction and reg
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 18:02:14 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Debian already classifies packages in different priorities, to
be used today when package updates are pushed into testing, for
example.
You appear to have confused package priority and upload urgency.
Testing migration is affected by th
]] Bernd Zeimetz
| On 05/26/2011 07:54 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
| > ]] Scott Kitterman
| >
| > | Was there some discussion of this with Alioth users before it got
| > | changed?
| >
| > No.
| >
| > And while I apologise for the problems we've had with the migration, I'd
| > like to ask peop
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 21:15 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Bernd Zeimetz
>
> | On 05/26/2011 07:54 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> | > ]] Scott Kitterman
> | >
> | > | Was there some discussion of this with Alioth users before it got
> | > | changed?
> | >
> | > No.
> | >
> | > And while I a
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 18:22:10 +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
> Uh... Maybe I missed the point of this tool which was obvious to many
> others, but could you provide a typical use case for using it ?
I assume it is a matter of not wanting to manually maintain $pkg.install
files.
Here is an except f
2011/6/5 Jakub Wilk :
> * Nicolas CANIART , 2011-06-05, 12:06:
>>
>> * Package name : python-sphinx-aafig
>
> Why such a package name? [...]
Done.
>
>> * URL : http://pypi.python.org/sphinxcontrib-aafig/
> I think you meant: http://packages.python.org/sphinxcontrib-aafig/
Yep that
Le dimanche 05 juin 2011 à 18:02 +0200, Harald Dunkel a écrit :
> I understand that splitting main into core/stable and
> main/testing would be a deep cut. Surely I do not expect it
> to happen within the next few weeks or months. Just think
> about it.
What you do not understand is how presumptu
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 01:18:43PM +0200, Emil Langrock wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have currently the problem that I have to use large, computing intensive
> applications [1,2]. These are usually implemented in many source files. I
> used
> in the past pseudo c files which include all other c files [3]
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 01:18:43PM +0200, Emil Langrock wrote:
> I played around a little bit with GCC's LTO [4]. It is really impressive for
> this kind of applications. I had a size reduction and speed increase with the
> tested applications. Of course, it was just a small testset and not reall
I would like to join the Debian development team. How do I get started?
The two things I would like to work on are:
1. Lightweight programs for burning CDs and DVDs: The KDE and GNOME distros
come with CD/DVD burning programs that INCLUDE verification. Most lightweight
distros do not. I use
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniele Tricoli
* Package name: python-requests
Version : 0.4.1
Upstream Author : Kenneth Reitz
* URL : http://python-requests.org
* License : ISC
Programming Lang: Python
Description : an elegant and simple HTTP
Umowa sprzedaży nie podlego opodatkowaniu VAT !!
Witam,
oferta sprzedaży hali w Gryficach woj. zachodniopomorskie 28 km od Mrzeżyna nad morzem. Więcej informacji ...
http://www.gremius.pl/pl/nieruchomosci-gryfice/obiekty/sprzedaz/GRE-HS-649
Na sprzedaż hala produkcyjno-magazyn
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 01:15:29AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Speed gains for compiled executables are great, though: around 20%[2].
It depends. I have code where using -flto causes no significant
improvement (< 2%) in some cases and major performance losses (-7 to
-37%) in others. This is no
[CCing you since I assume you are not subscribed]
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Jason Hsu wrote:
> I would like to join the Debian development team. How do I get started?
In general:
http://www.debian.org/devel/join/
> 1. ... I want to provide PBurn and iso2cd ...
Neither of these is avai
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 06/04/11 07:56, Paul Wise wrote:
>> Sounds like you are looking for backports.debian.org?
>
> Backports for Squeeze contains just about 400 package,
Hmm, I'm getting the impression that what you want is a
squeeze-backports-auto suite that c
Paul Wise writes:
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>> On 06/04/11 07:56, Paul Wise wrote:
>>> Sounds like you are looking for backports.debian.org?
>> Backports for Squeeze contains just about 400 package,
> Hmm, I'm getting the impression that what you want is a
> squeeze
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 20:56:25 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 21:15 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > vasks has the copy of the repositories.
> >
> > wagner NFS mounts the repositories read-only.
> >
> > vasks is {git,svn,…}.debian.org (so ssh://git.d.o/ continues working),
>
48 matches
Mail list logo
