On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 08:06, Olivier Berger
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Le lundi 25 avril 2011 à 10:29 +0200, Ondřej Surý a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> if your package depends on libdbX.Y you probably want to at least look at it:
>>
>> http://wiki.debian.org/BerkeleyDB
>> http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/Berke
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:04:32 +0200
Ondřej Surý wrote:
> > Maybe a list of such rdepends package + maintainers would help.
>
> Packages are listed on transition tracking page and tagged with db5.1
> bug. I have added those two links to to the /BerkeleyDB page (the
> ReleaseGoals page already have
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: pcl
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Radu Bogdan Rusu (r...@willowgarage.com)
* URL : http://pointclouds.org
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C++
Description : The Point Cloud
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: cminpack
Version : 1.1.3
Upstream Author : Frederic Devernay
* URL : http://devernay.free.fr/hacks/cminpack/cminpack.html
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : softw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
I've been asking this question on debian-mentors before, but people
involved into this process might be better addressed through d-d, so I
hope you don't mind as I got there no answer so far.
I was wondering what the exact requirements for
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Uoti Urpala wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh debian.org> writes:
> > On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > Telling someone "the bug is in a version I pulled from the VCS but didn't
> > > bother noting down which version it was" is not very useful.
> >
> > Now yo
So I have created list of affected packages (thanks to Neil Williams
for hinting dd-list), there are four lists:
1. Build-Depends on libdb[45]\..*-dev
http://wiki.debian.org/BerkeleyDB/Build-Depends
2. Depends
http://wiki.debian.org/BerkeleyDB/Depends
3. Depends - Build-Depends (aka indirect dep
Dear dd,
I have seen that fedora is trying to consolidate the number of crypto
package shipped [1]. What do you think about this goal ?
Moreover a lot of keyring solution are available for the desktop but
are not directly compatible between them, and is near a nightmare (for
instance mozilla is n
Este e-mail es solo para recordarte que el último evento exclusivo de
Postgrados y MBA en el exterior del año, será el próximo 4 de Mayo.
Inscríbete ahora. Inscripción gratuita:
http://www.expo-postgrados.com/feria2011
Este evento solo es una vez por año, y es la mejor oportunidad que tienes
pa
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 04:07:11PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> > On 26/04/2011 01:50, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > > Anyway - Summing up what I'm saying here, tags have a clear meaning: A
> > > point where upstream wants us to base our efforts
Hi Arno,
Am -10.01.-28163 20:59, schrieb Arno Töll:
> Now, what's exactly meant by primary UID? The primary GPG UID? If yes,
> am I right when I assume signing a package with a non-primary GPG UID
> or even more with a sub key won't work to fulfill DM upload rights?
the first UID with an email ad
On 2011-04-26, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> I have seen that fedora is trying to consolidate the number of crypto
> package shipped [1]. What do you think about this goal ?
Is there any progress on Fedora's effort? So far it seemed like Vaporware to
me. (Given that it's not exactly a Fedora featu
On 2011-04-26, Torsten Werner wrote:
> Am -10.01.-28163 20:59, schrieb Arno Töll:
>> Now, what's exactly meant by primary UID? The primary GPG UID? If yes,
>> am I right when I assume signing a package with a non-primary GPG UID
>> or even more with a sub key won't work to fulfill DM upload rights
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2011-04-26, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>> I have seen that fedora is trying to consolidate the number of crypto
>> package shipped [1]. What do you think about this goal ?
>
> Is there any progress on Fedora's effort? So far it seemed like
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alastair McKinstry
* Package name: ccseapps
Version : 4.5
Upstream Author : Center for Computational Sciences and Engineering
* URL : http://ccse.lbl.gov/Software/index.html
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C++
Descr
On Apr 26, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> I have seen that fedora is trying to consolidate the number of crypto
> package shipped [1]. What do you think about this goal ?
While I believe it to be a worthwhile goal, I have serious doubts that
we should actively switch packages to NSS when this causes
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Apr 26, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>
>> I have seen that fedora is trying to consolidate the number of crypto
>> package shipped [1]. What do you think about this goal ?
> While I believe it to be a worthwhile goal, I have serious doubts tha
4. Build-Depends - Depends (aka invalid listing in Build-Depends)
http://wiki.debian.org/BerkeleyDB/InvalidBuild-Depends
Packages in list 4 should be fixed because it means either one of:
1. The Build-Depends listing is erroneous (f.e. upstream dropped
support for Berkeley DB)
2. The build p
Could the Debian obituaries start including the age, and cause of death
please. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obituary#Contents
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.deb
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 04:15:41AM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> Could the Debian obituaries start including the age, and cause of death
> please. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obituary#Contents
Whatever information is given in obituaries has been put there on
request (or at least their ackno
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Torsten,
On 26.04.2011 16:06, Torsten Werner wrote:
> the first UID with an email address is used by dak. It can be changed
> manually if there is a good reason for such a change. Please file a bug
> report against ftp.debian.org if you need such a
Bastien ROUCARIES writes:
> I have seen that fedora is trying to consolidate the number of crypto
> package shipped [1]. What do you think about this goal ?
Patches to WebAuth to support NSS are welcome, but I'm sure not going to
bother. Seems like a waste of time to me. If I were going to por
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh debian.org> writes:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Uoti Urpala wrote:
> > Using date and time as a version is not current best practice. You'll still
> > need the upstream version part too to sort correctly relative to released
> > versions.
>
> I was refering to the full comm
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:28:07PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> In this sense, most reasonable solution seems to me
>
> 0.YYMMDD
>
> This way, when ever upstream decide to release package with sane
> versioning (usually bigger than 1.) within 8 chars and we can continue
> without epoch. But this
Torsten Werner writes:
> Hi Arno,
>
> Am -10.01.-28163 20:59, schrieb Arno Töll:
> > Now, what's exactly meant by primary UID? The primary GPG UID? If
> > yes, am I right when I assume signing a package with a non-primary
> > GPG UID or even more with a sub key won't work to fulfill DM upload
> >
jida...@jidanni.org writes:
> Could the Debian obituaries start including the age, and cause of death
> please. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obituary#Contents
−1. It's not the business of the Debian project to ask such questions of
the surviving family, nor to distribute that information without
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hemanth HM
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ruby-debug
Version : 0.10.4
Upstream Author : Kent Sibilev
Rocky Bernstein
* URL : http://rubyforge.o
27 matches
Mail list logo
