Lucas Nussbaum schrieb:
>That's what we plan to do: for now, ruby1.8 is the default
>implementation/version, and will have the highest priority in
>alternatives. So switching to say jruby would require manual
>intervention.
Exactly that will ensure you run into a mess. Don't allow to switch
On 06/03/11 at 10:02 +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Lucas Nussbaum schrieb:
>
> >That's what we plan to do: for now, ruby1.8 is the default
> >implementation/version, and will have the highest priority in
> >alternatives. So switching to say jruby would require manual
> >intervention.
Le dimanche 06 mars 2011 à 10:10 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> I prefer the situation where we empower users to make the switch if they
> decide to, to the situation where we arbitrarily decide that users
> should use Ruby 1.8 with no ability to change this (and get bug reports
> for that). No
Le samedi 05 mars 2011 à 00:22 +0100, Piotr Ożarowski a écrit :
> > Breaks: python (>= 2.8), python (<< 2.5)
>
> yeah, that's to avoid bug reports when someone will try to use this
> package with (default) python 2.4 or python 2.8 (which will NEVER be
> released, BTW). dh_python2 will create simi
On 06/03/11 at 10:43 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 06 mars 2011 à 10:10 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> > I prefer the situation where we empower users to make the switch if they
> > decide to, to the situation where we arbitrarily decide that users
> > should use Ruby 1.8 with no
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Krennwallner
* Package name: bool2cnf
Version : 20110304
Upstream Author : Tatsuhiro Tsuchiya
* URL :
http://www-ise4.ist.osaka-u.ac.jp/~t-tutiya/sources/bool2cnf/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Descrip
Hi,
In the pkg-ruby-extras team, we are considering switching from
svn-buildpackage to git.
Does someone has feedback on this switch, in the context of teams
maintaining many small packages?
Specifically, I'm looking for a way to easy track all of the team's
repositories, update them all, etc. I
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 10:58:47AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 06/03/11 at 10:43 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le dimanche 06 mars 2011 à 10:10 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> > > I prefer the situation where we empower users to make the switch if they
> > > decide to, to the situatio
Le dimanche 06 mars 2011 à 10:58 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> > You are just going to empower users to shoot themselves in the foot.
>
> What if users want the ability to shoot themselves in the foot?
Currently you’re the one holding the weapon.
> Also, you seem to assume that Ruby 1.9 is
On 06/03/11 at 11:22 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 06 mars 2011 à 10:58 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> > > You are just going to empower users to shoot themselves in the foot.
> >
> > What if users want the ability to shoot themselves in the foot?
>
> Currently you’re the one h
Le dimanche 06 mars 2011 à 11:40 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> Note that, for applications written in Ruby and packaged in Debian, we
> will make sure that they work no matter what /usr/bin/ruby points to (if
> necessary, by forcing the shebang to ruby1.8, and installing the correct
> dependen
Le 06/03/2011 11:12, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> In the pkg-ruby-extras team, we are considering switching from
> svn-buildpackage to git.
>
> Does someone has feedback on this switch, in the context of teams
> maintaining many small packages?
We did that a few years back in the OCaml team, and it
OoO En cette fin de matinée radieuse du dimanche 06 mars 2011, vers
11:40, Lucas Nussbaum disait :
> Note that, for applications written in Ruby and packaged in Debian, we
> will make sure that they work no matter what /usr/bin/ruby points to (if
> necessary, by forcing the shebang to ruby1.
Am Samstag, den 05.03.2011, 22:39 +0100 schrieb Michael Goetze:
> regardless of the license it may be illegal to distribute this in Germany.
I don't think this will be an issue. Installing the wolf4sdl package
won't give you the whole game, only the engine. In order to actually
play the game you'l
Hi,
Am Montag, den 28.02.2011, 19:12 + schrieb Roger Leigh:
> Agreed. Note that we now support strict 'first-only' alternatives
> handling with the 'apt' and 'aptitude' resolvers. See the notes for
> 0.60.0 and 0.60.1 pertaining to resolvers here:
>
> http://git.debian.org/?p=buildd-tools/s
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> I have a bit a bad feeling about not being able to use alternatives in
> build-depends. For example at the moment, we are renaming a self-hosting
> compiler package from ghc6 to ghc. Previously, the dependency has been
> on "ghc6". Now it i
Package: wnpp
Owner: gregor herrmann
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: liblocale-maketext-simple-perl
Version : 0.21
Upstream Author : Audrey Tang
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Locale-Make
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 06.03.2011, 16:41 +0100 schrieb Olaf van der Spek:
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > I have a bit a bad feeling about not being able to use alternatives in
> > build-depends. For example at the moment, we are renaming a self-hosting
> > compiler pac
Quoting Stéphane Glondu (glo...@debian.org):
> > Specifically, I'm looking for a way to easy track all of the team's
> > repositories, update them all, etc. It seems that the Debian Games team
> > uses mr (according to http://wiki.debian.org/Games/VCS). Are there
> > alternatives worth considering
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request assistance with maintaining the nfs-utils package.
The package description is:
Use this package on any machine that uses NFS, either as client or
server. Programs included: lockd, statd, showmount, nfsstat, gssd
and idmapd.
This is co-maintained by An
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 04:22:01PM -0800, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Do you have concrete data to add here, apart from speculation? I
> would be interested in such data (as the once and perhaps future
> maintainer of fvwm in Debian).
I have no idea whether it is pure speculation or wrong
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: PythonQt
Version : 2.0.1
Upstream Author : Florian Link
* URL : http://pythonqt.sf.net
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Dynamic Python binding for the Qt fra
On Sun, Mar 06 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 04:22:01PM -0800, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Do you have concrete data to add here, apart from speculation? I
>> would be interested in such data (as the once and perhaps future
>> maintainer of fvwm in Debian).
>
> I ha
Dear developers,
I got the proble, that a once given label is stored by udev, although the
label of the device is deleted by mlabel.
Whenever I put it in, the device keeps its first given label, as it is stored
in its database (I guess).
Is there a way, to configure udev so, that labels (but U
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 18:37 +0100, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> Dear developers,
>
> I got the proble, that a once given label is stored by udev, although the
> label of the device is deleted by mlabel.
>
> Whenever I put it in, the device keeps its first given label, as it is stored
> in its databa
[Dropping the bug cc: again, I don't think that has anything to do with this
question]
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 06:26:27PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > So in this case the pre-dependency
> > should *not* be set, as it only serves to complicate the upgrade path.
> I think this example might de
Hi all,
I am pleased to announce the very first unofficial Debian monthly
testing snapshot release (version 2011.03). It is currently available
in two flavors as mini iso images (for i386 and amd64 at 16 MiB each)
downloadable from:
http://alioth.debian.org/~gilbert-guest/snapshots/2011.03/debian-
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 06:17:36PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> [Bcc: all maintainers of GNOME applets]
>
> Hi,
>
> as it was already mentioned for other reasons, GNOME 3 is just around
> the corner, and there are some big changes ahead. DO NOT PANIC: the
> current desktop with gnome-panel an
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Scott Howard
* Package name: fparser
Version : 4.3
Upstream Author : Juha Nieminen (http://iki.fi/warp/), Joel Yliluoma
(http://iki.fi/bisqwit/).
* URL : http://warp.povusers.org/FunctionParser/
* License : LGPL-3.0+
Pr
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 18:17 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> If you develop, maintain or use one of those packages, and you don’t
> want it to disappear, your options are now:
>
> 1. Prepare to disable gnome-panel support (that’s for packages
> which already have other options, such a
Hello Matthias,
was this MBF announced & coordinated somewhere (and I simply missed
that message) as specified in [1]?
[1]
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/beyond-pkging.html#submit-many-bugs
Cheers,
Sandro
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 00:47, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: src:cssuti
On Sat, 5 Mar 2011, Steve Langasek wrote:
> For packages in wheezy/sid, it's redundant because the versioned dependency
> is already satisfied by the version of dpkg in squeeze, i.e., it's met even
> before upgrading to wheezy or sid.
I note that it’s potentially still relevant for the future Ubun
Hi,
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011, Anders Kaseorg wrote:
> > So in this case the pre-dependency should *not* be set, as it only
> > serves to complicate the upgrade path.
>
> If this becomes the consensus of debian-devel, there are two things that
> should probably be changed:
>
> • The section of the d
Am 07.03.2011 07:53, schrieb Anders Kaseorg:
> On Sat, 5 Mar 2011, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> For packages in wheezy/sid, it's redundant because the versioned dependency
>> is already satisfied by the version of dpkg in squeeze, i.e., it's met even
>> before upgrading to wheezy or sid.
>
> I note th
Hi,
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Hello Matthias,
> was this MBF announced & coordinated somewhere (and I simply missed
> that message) as specified in [1]?
He's the maintainer of python-central, he can certainly decide of its
fate.
While a review on -devel (and in general sharing ne
On 03/07/2011 07:57 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Hello Matthias,
> was this MBF announced & coordinated somewhere (and I simply missed
> that message) as specified in [1]?
>
> [1]
> http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/beyond-pkging.html#submit-many-bugs
Although i appreciate that python-c
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 08:25:39AM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> On 03/07/2011 07:57 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > Hello Matthias,
> > was this MBF announced & coordinated somewhere (and I simply missed
> > that message) as specified in [1]?
> > [1]
> > http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 01:53:22AM -0500, Anders Kaseorg wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Mar 2011, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > For packages in wheezy/sid, it's redundant because the versioned dependency
> > is already satisfied by the version of dpkg in squeeze, i.e., it's met even
> > before upgrading to wheezy
38 matches
Mail list logo
