hi...
Can you solve this? Only skilled people can open this file...
Once you succeed to open this file, you will find names of the people who
have managed to open this..
Now it is your turn! How to open attached file?
*A man was traveling to London. At the
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:13:38PM +1000, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> JFYI.
>
> Debian has been represented at the meeting by Enrico Zini (who has
> blogged about various aspects of the meeting as well [1,2,3]) and David
> Kalnischkies. In the end, quite some pieces of Debian technologies have
> a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Pentchev
* Package name: daemontools-encore
Version : 1.05
Upstream Author : Bruce Guenter
* URL : http://untroubled.org/daemontools-encore/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C
Description : A collection of
- Robinetul cu LED este un gadget inteligent si totodata de siguranta.
Gadgetul se instaleaza la teava de la chiuveta dumneavoastra si se activeaza in
momentul cand deschideti robinetul, datorita senzorului termic cu care este
dotat.
- Tester electronic de alcoolemie (alcooltest) cu Ecran LCD p
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 02:45:57PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Ian: would you mind summarizing the status of that effort and
> > comment on whether, in your opinion, people interested on this topic
> > should continue from there or start over?
>
> Sure. autopkgtest (the codebase) isn't very big
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 02:46:40PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > * A specification which allows a source package to declare that it
> >contains tests, and how those tests need to be run. This
> >specification was discussed extensively on debian-devel at the
> >time and a copy is in th
Stefano Zacchiroli writes ("Re: package testing, autopkgtest, and all that"):
> I find "INSTALLED version of the program" to be ambiguous. It might
> refer to installed in the sense of 'debian/rules install' (or, to be
> more precise, 'debian/rules binary', given that 'install' is not
> dictated by
Stefano Zacchiroli writes ("Re: package testing, autopkgtest, and all that"):
>
> I confess that this seems to be exactly one of those cases where the
> DEP process (should) shine. By putting the specification in a more
> visible place than (only) in an archive package we can give it more
>
Hi,
I'm the upstream maintainer of the Music Player Daemon project, and
receive a number of support requests / bug reports from Debian users
who use the outdated version 0.15.12 of "mpd", currently in testing.
These bugs were already fixed in newer maintenance releases.
I know that Debian does no
Hi
Dne Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:25:11 +0100
Max Kellermann napsal(a):
> I'm the upstream maintainer of the Music Player Daemon project, and
> receive a number of support requests / bug reports from Debian users
> who use the outdated version 0.15.12 of "mpd", currently in testing.
> These bugs were a
Michal Čihař, le Mon 31 Jan 2011 16:01:54 +0100, a écrit :
> Dne Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:25:11 +0100
> Max Kellermann napsal(a):
>
> > I'm the upstream maintainer of the Music Player Daemon project, and
> > receive a number of support requests / bug reports from Debian users
> > who use the outdated
On 31/01/11 at 00:29 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> The best incentive for adoption in this case is having periodic runs of
> package tests, with reporting. At first glance, I'm tempted to propose
> to use grid archive rebuilds to run tests. Lucas: how much work would it
> be to hack your rebui
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Marco Balmer
* Package name: fadecut
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Marco Balmer
* URL : https://www.github.com/micressor/fadecut
* License : GPL v3
Programming Lang: bash
Description : Radio livestream to ogg
Lucas Nussbaum writes ("Re: package testing, autopkgtest, and all that"):
> If there's a packaged tool to run the test suite on a given package,
> then it's quite easy to integrate it into my infrastructure. But I
> clearly do not have the time to get autopkgtest's code back in shape
> first.
Yes,
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:25:11 +0100, Max Kellermann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm the upstream maintainer of the Music Player Daemon project, and
> receive a number of support requests / bug reports from Debian users
> who use the outdated version 0.15.12 of "mpd", currently in testing.
> These bugs were al
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dominique Dumont
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libpod-wordlist-hanekomu-perl
Version : 1.110090
Upstream Author : Marcel Gruenauer
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Po
(please drop cc's other than debian-policy in replies if you want to
work on that)
Hi Wookey,
Wookey wrote:
> Debian policy (8.2) says:
> ---
> It is recommended that supporting files and run-time support programs
> that do not need to be invoked manually by users, but are neverthele
tcl8.5-dev contains /usr/lib/tcl8.5/tclConfig.sh
which is a symlink pointing to /usr/share/tcltk/tcl8.5/tclConfig.sh
Currently dpkg-cross only copies symlinks across when crossing a
package if the symlink points to somewhere within /lib. symlinks
outside /lib are ignored because they are not arch-
At the most recent Linux.conf.au pgp keysigning, I noticed a number of
Debian developers present. Like me, they had new keys that they offered
up for signing, presumably so they could start replacing their 1024DSA
keys with stronger keys.
If you are signing keys where you've verified the identity
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Denis Roio
* Package name: tomb
Version : 0.9.0
Upstream Author : Denis Roio
* URL : http://tomb.dyne.org/
* License : GPLv3
Programming Lang: C, Shell
Description : crypto undertaker
Tomb is a free and easy to
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 01:49:26PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> If you are signing keys where you've verified the identity of fellow
> Debian developers at a key signing party, please do us all a favor and
> don't just sign it with your brand-new key --- but *also* sign the DD's
> key with whateve
Quoting Max Kellermann (m...@duempel.org):
> I'm the upstream maintainer of the Music Player Daemon project, and
> receive a number of support requests / bug reports from Debian users
> who use the outdated version 0.15.12 of "mpd", currently in testing.
> These bugs were already fixed in newer ma
For this specific tcl issue, there was some discussion in Debian
#599206; I didn't comment back on the bug, but I liked Goswin's
proposal
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debia
Hi,
a more theoretical question quite related to this:
If one plans to have the key replaced in the keyring, and we have a
fellow DD in the keyring who's only trust path to other Debian
Developers goes via that key (this might become a real scenario when we
do a bigger round of key replacements)
Hi Wookey,
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 05:16:15PM +, Wookey wrote:
> Debian policy (8.2) says:
> ---
> It is recommended that supporting files and run-time support programs
> that do not need to be invoked manually by users, but are nevertheless
> required for the package to function,
]] Samuel Thibault
Hi,
| His question could be rephrased: will the 6.0.x updates be allowed to
| pick up new upstream "stable" fixes releases?
While I can't speak for the release team (neither the stable or the
«regular» one), I know that postgresql stable releases are generally
allowed into ne
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
* Package name: node-postgres
Version : 0.2.6
Upstream Author : Brian Carlson
* URL : https://github.com/brianc/node-postgres
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: JavaScript
Description : PostgreS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 31/01/11 20:18, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 05:16:15PM +, Wookey wrote:
>> So, the questions is - which of these is the correct fix:
>> 1) make dpkg-cross copy over symlinks even when they point into
>> /usr/share
>> 2) mak
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Samuel Thibault
* Package name: festvox-mbrola
Version : 1.95
Upstream Author : Centre for Speech Technology Research University of
Edinburgh, UK
* URL : http://www.cstr.ed.ac.uk/projects/festival/
* License : BSD
Pro
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Emilien Klein
* Package name: nautilus-image-manipulator
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Emilien Klein
* URL : https://launchpad.net/nautilus-image-manipulator
* License : GPL 3
Programming Lang: Python
Description
I created an automatically generated CPE list for Fedora13 packages. It only
has 300 or so packages in it, but this will improve as say Debian increase
the list of packages they track (they only track 1100 or so currently).
https://github.com/silviocesare/Equivalent-Packages/blob/master/CPE/Fedora
+++ Steve Langasek [2011-01-31 12:18 -0800]:
> > So, the questions is - which of these is the correct fix:
> > 1) make dpkg-cross copy over symlinks even when they point into
> > /usr/share
> > 2) make tcl8.5 put tclConfig.sh in /usr/lib/tcl8.5 instead of
> > /usr/share/tcltk/tcl8.5
> > 3) make sql
Package: nodejs
Version: 0.2.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
It appears that nodejs in experimental has acquired a Conflicts with
node. According to the changes file for that release:
* Use upstream binary names for node and node-waf,
conflicts with node package. (Closes: #59757
33 matches
Mail list logo
