Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Vincent Cheng
* Package name: naev
Version : 0.4.2
Upstream Author : Edgar Simo "bobbens"
Nikola Whallon <6.satur...@gmail.com>
Josiah Schwartfeger
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 10:04:33PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote [edited]:
> We should find a better way to identify firmware packages, allowing
> hw-detect to find the correct ones without unpacking.
Some options: an optional control field in binary packages or, perhaps better,
a debtags facet
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 02:30:36PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote [edited]:
> so googleearth-package was removed from squeeze, because of a RC bug, which
> was fixed on mentors.d.n for 4 days already when it was removed.
The sponsorship request should have been CC'ed to the RC bug report.
-S
--
To
hallo.
ich habe mir einen bootfähigen USB-Stick "gebastelt" mit debian Lenny
(5.0.7Live).
ich habe ihn bei meinem freund ausprobiert und er funzt. "Toll"
leider habe ich das problem das mein PC Compaq keinen Boot von
USB unterstützt.
Bei Damn Small Linux habe ich festgestellt das man a von 3
On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 11:52 +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 10:04:33PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote [edited]:
> > We should find a better way to identify firmware packages, allowing
> > hw-detect to find the correct ones without unpacking.
>
> Some options: an option
For the record: I answered Matthias in a private e-mail, just forgot to CC
-devel, don't know why I didn't use the "answer list" function.
Kind regards,
Kai Wasserbäch
--
Kai Wasserbäch (Kai Wasserbaech)
E-Mail: deb...@carbon-project.org
Jabber (debianforum.de): Drizzt
URL: http://wiki.debia
# CC to debian-devel for squeeze blocker
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 605912 + squeeze-is-blocker
thanks
Hi,
Thanks for looking at this bug. I think the patch you've suggested is
the wrong solution, however.
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 01:14 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> I gue
While we are on topic.
Maintainer scripts of runit package modify /etc/inittab
Although looks like /etc/inittab is not owned by any package, so policy is
not violated, this IMO still looks strange in debian context.
Is modifying /etc/inittab from postinst ok for random debian package these
day
[Nikita V. Youshchenko]
> Is modifying /etc/inittab from postinst ok for random debian package
> these days?
It is unlikely to cause upgrade problems, at least. :) The file is
copied in place by the sysvinit postinst only if it is missing.
Vennlig hilsen,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen
--
To UNSUBSC
Hi
I've just noticed that on libapache2-mod-php5 package upgrade, apache
server was not restartted (but only HUPed because of force-reload called
from libapache2-mod-php5 postinst)
Doesn't this mean that running apache has still old version of php module
loaded, so it still is vulnerable to is
10 matches
Mail list logo