On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 23:18:09 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
...
> I'm also looking for volunteers who could support the Emdebian
> archive with local mirrors to reduce the load on the current machine.
> (Standard mirroring tools should work, albeit on a pull method rather
> than a push, please.)
I'
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 11:38:44 +0100
Philip Hands wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 23:18:09 +0100, Neil Williams
> wrote: ...
> > I'm also looking for volunteers who could support the Emdebian
> > archive with local mirrors to reduce the load on the current
> > machine. (Standard mirroring tools shoul
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:18:09PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> 3: Separate translation packages for those embedded installations which
> actually might need to present translated strings from the base system.
Shameless plug, what is the status of "DEP-4: Translation packages in
Debian (TDebs)" h
Seen in Lenny. Is it really necessary to run apt-cache in order
to shut down BIND?
10852 ?Ss 0:00 /bin/sh /etc/init.d/rc 6
11470 ?S 0:00 \_ /bin/sh /etc/rc6.d/K85bind9 stop
11471 ?S 0:00 \_ /bin/sh /etc/rc6.d/K85bind9 stop
11472 ?S 0:00
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 05:46:38 -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
> Seen in Lenny. Is it really necessary to run apt-cache in order
> to shut down BIND?
>
Is it really necessary to send your bug reports to debian-devel?
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 14:59:50 +0200
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:18:09PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > 3: Separate translation packages for those embedded installations
> > which actually might need to present translated strings from the
> > base system.
>
> Shameless
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Reinhard Tartler
* Package name: ffms2
Version : 2.13
Upstream Author : Fredrik Mellbin, Mike Matsnev
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/ffmpegsource
* License : MIT (but debian packages will be GPL'ed because of linking
a
On Sat October 23 2010 06:21:35 Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 05:46:38 -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
> > Seen in Lenny. Is it really necessary to run apt-cache in order
> > to shut down BIND?
>
> Is it really necessary to send your bug reports to debian-devel?
(1) It's a question, not
On 10/23/2010 11:55 AM, Mike Bird wrote:
> On Sat October 23 2010 06:21:35 Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 05:46:38 -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
>>> Seen in Lenny. Is it really necessary to run apt-cache in order
>>> to shut down BIND?
>>
>> Is it really necessary to send your bug repo
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 16:48 +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> If we decide to reject 'admin', I think we should use sudo. I find the
> argument that admin is confusing given the presence of adm fairly
> convincing -- It's all too easy to say something like "could you add
> fred to the adm group" over t
On Sat October 23 2010 10:58:54 Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
> On 10/23/2010 11:55 AM, Mike Bird wrote:
> > On Sat October 23 2010 06:21:35 Julien Cristau wrote:
> >> On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 05:46:38 -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
> >>> Seen in Lenny. Is it really necessary to run apt-cache in order
> >>> to
On 24 October 2010 11:30, Mike Bird wrote:
> Maybe someone here would care to address the actual question?
My /etc/init.d/bind9 has:
DISTRO=$(lsb_release -is 2>/dev/null || echo Debian)
lsb_release seems to call apt-cache policy.
On one hand, the value of $DISTRO doesn't seem to be used anywh
Mike Bird wrote:
> Seen in Lenny. Is it really necessary to run apt-cache in order
> to shut down BIND?
The Lenny package's /etc/init.d/bind9 script calls 'lsb_release -is'
to determine the distribution and if the 'lsb-release' package is
installed then the lsb_release script calls 'apt-cache pol
On Sat October 23 2010 18:20:11 Brian May wrote:
> On the other hand, so what if it calls apt-cache policy - does that
> matter? Maybe apt-cache policy is broken on Mike's system?
It takes about fifteen seconds for apt-cache to run on a system
that hasn't previously accessed those files. That's a
14 matches
Mail list logo
