Hi, Neil:
On Thursday 22 July 2010 20:28:49 Neil Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:53:53 -0700
[..]
> Removing packages from testing does not remove them from any existing
> installation, so it's hard to see how the removal of packages which are
> plainly not suitable for release in stable
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Have you ever actually tried to call people to arms and *form* the CUT
> team?
No. But it's been 3 years, so please don't wait for me to do it. ;)
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi, Don:
On Thursday 22 July 2010 23:51:10 Don Armstrong wrote:
[...]
> Testing's primary purpose is as a staging ground for the next release;
> while it'd be nice to try to keep it working as a fully installable
> version all of the time, progress to the next release is more
> important than that
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 09:31:46AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> The days where every Linux computer has to have a working MTA are
> gone, and typically tends to be very painful especially for
> portable/laptop computers which may not have no single way to send
> outgoing mail that is guaranteed to alw
On 23 July 2010 10:03, brian m. carlson wrote:
> You can use "smtphost reportbug.debian.org" in the configuration file.
> As for blocking direct outgoing SMTP connections:
This is news for me. Is there any thoughts on making this the default?
Based on what you say, it seems to use port 587 by de
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 608 (new: 0)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 143 (new: 7)
Total number of packages request
Hello,
On 07/23/2010 02:03 AM, Jesús M. Navarro wrote:
> On Thursday 22 July 2010 23:51:10 Don Armstrong wrote:
> [...]
>> Testing's primary purpose is as a staging ground for the next release;
>> while it'd be nice to try to keep it working as a fully installable
>> version all of the time, progre
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010, Jesús M. Navarro wrote:
> On Thursday 22 July 2010 23:51:10 Don Armstrong wrote:
> > Testing's primary purpose is as a staging ground for the next
> > release; while it'd be nice to try to keep it working as a fully
> > installable version all of the time, progress to the next
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010, Brian May wrote:
> On 23 July 2010 10:03, brian m. carlson wrote:
> > You can use "smtphost reportbug.debian.org" in the configuration file.
> > As for blocking direct outgoing SMTP connections:
>
> This is news for me. Is there any thoughts on making this the default?
It is
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:26:47AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> On 23 July 2010 10:03, brian m. carlson wrote:
> > You can use "smtphost reportbug.debian.org" in the configuration file.
> > As for blocking direct outgoing SMTP connections:
>
> This is news for me. Is there any thoughts on making thi
>> Have you ever actually tried to call people to arms and *form* the CUT
>> team?
> No. But it's been 3 years, so please don't wait for me to do it. ;)
JFTR, with the great new machine ftpmaster got, we actually have the
resources to run such a thing (archive wise, manpower is
different). That i
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniele Tricoli
* Package name: python-pyth
Version : 0.5.5
Upstream Author : Brendon Hogger
* URL : http://github.com/brendonh/pyth
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Python library to conver
On Jo, 22 iul 10, 22:51:32, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 03:10:16PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > I've noticed that linking to this page seems to kill threads, which is
> > not my intent, but: http://kitenet.net/~joey/code/debian/cut/
> >
> > The idea still seems reasonable to
On Vi, 23 iul 10, 02:51:36, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:26:47AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> > On 23 July 2010 10:03, brian m. carlson
> > wrote:
> > > You can use "smtphost reportbug.debian.org" in the configuration file.
> > > As for blocking direct outgoing SMTP connectio
On Jo, 22 iul 10, 16:45:33, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>
> This one is very interesting, as it is the main contact point from our
> users. The number of subscribers did not drop, but the traffic did (non
> surprisingly, the number of subscribers increases when the traffic
> decreases, and vice-ver
101 - 115 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
