Re: [copy, not move of conffile] How to warn about need to port changes to new configuration file?

2010-06-19 Thread Vincent Danjean
On 18/06/2010 16:57, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Thomas Hood] >> It is planned that an upcoming version of resolvconf will add a new >> hook script for isc-dhcp-client which is identical to the existing one >> for dhcp3-client. An administrator who has made local changes to the >> latter hook sc

Re: [copy, not move of conffile] How to warn about need to port changes to new configuration file?

2010-06-19 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:20:49 +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote: > The difference here is that this is a copy, not a move, of the conffile. So you use cp instead of mv. Where's the problem exactly? Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [copy, not move of conffile] How to warn about need to port changes to new configuration file?

2010-06-19 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Vincent Danjean] > The difference here is that this is a copy, not a move, of the conffile. That is why I suggested to use a symlink too. This I would propose to move the conffile to the new location, and add a symlink in the old location to the new location, or just add a symlink to the old loc

Re: [RFC] Updating boot loaders in lenny and squeeze

2010-06-19 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello, Ben Hutchings wrote on 2010-06-19 03:55: > However, given that route B is present in both lenny and squeeze (and > even in etch, I think) there is no good reason for packages not to rely > on it now. (Well, except lack of documentation.) All boot loader > packages that fall into case 1

New LILO upstream development

2010-06-19 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello, After the long silence about the popular bootloader LILO the development was started again. The new Homepage can be found here: http://lilo.alioth.debian.org/ For the development of the bootloader I have started an Alioth project with Git repository and Mailinglist: http://alioth.debian.

Re: New LILO upstream development

2010-06-19 Thread Bjørn Mork
Joachim Wiedorn writes: > After the long silence about the popular bootloader LILO the development > was started again. > > The new Homepage can be found here: > http://lilo.alioth.debian.org/ > > For the development of the bootloader I have started an Alioth project > with Git repository and Mai

Re: New LILO upstream development

2010-06-19 Thread Patryk Cisek
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 12:39:53PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote: > Maybe someone could fix the certificate chain sorting on alioth? In the meantime you can either: $ GIT_SSL_NO_VERIFY=1 git clone https://alioth.debian.org/anonscm/git/lilo/lilo.git or: $ git clone git://git.debian.org/lilo/lilo.git --

Re: PLEASE ADD MY EMAIL ID

2010-06-19 Thread Mark Raghnall
Hi all I am a freelancer(Link building) and looking for other freelancer to work together. Please contact through mail. Thanks Mark

Re: [copy, not move of conffile] How to warn about need to port changes to new configuration file?

2010-06-19 Thread Vincent Danjean
On 19/06/2010 10:44, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:20:49 +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote: > >> The difference here is that this is a copy, not a move, of the conffile. > > So you use cp instead of mv. Where's the problem exactly? Should local modifications to the first script

Re: Bug#535830: ITP: php-recaptcha -- reCAPTCHA is a free CAPTCHA service

2010-06-19 Thread Thomas Goirand
Angel Abad (Ikusnet SLL) wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: "Angel Abad (Ikusnet SLL)" > > > * Package name: php-recaptcha > Version : 1.10 > Upstream Author : reCAPTCHA -- http://recaptcha.net > * URL : http://recaptcha.net > * License : MIT

RFA: a lot of packages

2010-06-19 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi fellow debian developers I have found out that I have less time for Debian than before. Therefore I would like someone to take over some of my packages. You can see the list of RFA bugs that I have submitted to WNPP. Bug#586406: RFA: countrycodes Bug#586408: RFA: ledcontrol -- scriptable keybo

Re: RFA: a lot of packages

2010-06-19 Thread Ben Armstrong
On 19/06/10 11:55 AM, Ola Lundqvist wrote: Bug#586413: RFA: tightvnc -- virtual network computing server software Bug#586414: RFA: vnc4 -- Virtual network computing server software Although I cannot take on sole maintainership, I'm interested in the survival of the best VNC server and clie

Re: Indicator applets and related packages

2010-06-19 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi Ted, thanks for your answer. On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, Ted Gould wrote: > > I think this could be a good idea indeed. A team that would be very open > > to the upstream Ubuntu/Canonical maintainers. > > I'm unfamiliar with Debian processes so I can't comment on whether a > team is appropriate. Bu

Re: RFA: a lot of packages

2010-06-19 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi Ben On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 03:41:04PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote: > On 19/06/10 11:55 AM, Ola Lundqvist wrote: >> Bug#586413: RFA: tightvnc -- virtual network computing server software >> Bug#586414: RFA: vnc4 -- Virtual network computing server software >> > > Although I cannot take on so

Re: RFA: a lot of packages

2010-06-19 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Ben Armstrong writes: > Although I cannot take on sole maintainership, I'm interested in the > survival of the best VNC server and client in Debian. If a team can > be put together, I would be happy to contribute in what small ways I > can. I'm a daily user of vnc4server/xvnc4viewer 4.1.1+X4.3.0

Re: RFA: a lot of packages

2010-06-19 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 11:50:35PM +0300, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: > Ben Armstrong writes: > > Although I cannot take on sole maintainership, I'm interested in the > > survival of the best VNC server and client in Debian. If a team can > > be put together, I would be happy to contribute in

Re: RFA: a lot of packages

2010-06-19 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Hi Ola, On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 04:55:43PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote [edited]: > Bug#586410: RFA: ntop -- display network usage in top-like format Has there been a resolution for possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl? -S -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Re: ITP: php-recaptcha -- PHP interface to recaptcha.net

2010-06-19 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi Mark, and thanks for your quick reply, Mark A. Hershberger wrote: > Thomas Goirand writes: > > These captchas are different than just generic captchas, though: > > reCAPTCHA is a free CAPTCHA service that helps to digitize books, > newspapers and old time radio shows. Check out our p

Re: Essentiality of Bash

2010-06-19 Thread jidanni
I don't get it. Even booting still requires bash $ find grub* -executable|xargs checkbashisms #grub-pc 1.98+20100617-1 script grub-common.preinst is already a bash script; skipping script grub-pc.postinst is already a bash script; skipping script grub-pc.postrm is already a bash script; skipping sc

Re: ITP: php-recaptcha -- PHP interface to recaptcha.net

2010-06-19 Thread Samuel Thibault
Thomas Goirand, le Sun 20 Jun 2010 09:06:28 +0800, a écrit : > As I see it, php-recaptcha should be sent to non-free (which means > anything depending on it would go in contrib). I'd be happy to see > others expressing themselves here, in order to make sure I don't hold an > extreme view on this.

What is the codename of the current stable release?

2010-06-19 Thread jidanni
In Debian Project News - June 14th, 2010 > "AR" == Alexander Reichle-Schmehl writes: AR> Debian Community Poll AR> The Poll is available at http://tinyurl.com/3y33ska . Torsten asks to AR> spread the link to as many users as possible. And there at tinyurl, we read |What is the codename of t

Re: ITP: php-recaptcha -- PHP interface to recaptcha.net

2010-06-19 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Thomas Goirand writes: > Please read point 9 of this document: > > http://people.debian.org/~bap/dfsg-faq.html > > Because we don't have the source code of the captcha system itself (you > only have access to the source code of something that accesses the > online service), php-recaptcha fails al