Consiga que sus ganancias crezcan al nivel nivel más alto
Que su producto o servicio lo conozca todo Lima
Cumplimos 12 años al servicio de las empresas peruanas y lo festejamos
ofreciéndole grandes oportunidades
Una enorme cantidad de clientes satisfechos nos respaldan
Diseño del correo sin c
On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 22:20:18 +0100
di wrote:
> Package: general
> Severity: normal
> Tags: squeeze
>
> In GNOME the default open action for when double-clicking on a .deb
> package is to open with Archive Manager, which then complains 'Could
> not create the archive: Archive type not supported.'
My perception was that the consensus reached was that we wanted umask
relaxation to be safe.
Bug#583970: pam_umask "usergroups": test if primary group, with
only implicit membership of the user
Closed on Sun, 6 Jun 2010 15:32:43 -0700:
> I don't think this is a check that it makes sense to add
[Stefano Zacchiroli]
> If you are ready to monitor the issue closely, I don't see any
> problem in switching the default now in unstable, see how it goes,
> and then decide later on if revert back to the current default in
> Squeeze time.
The switch to parallel booting was done 2010-05-14 in unst
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Miguel Landaeta
* Package name: spring-roo
Version : 1.0.2.RELEASE
Upstream Author : SpringSource Inc.
* URL : http://www.springsource.org/roo
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: Java
Description : lightweight and
Hi folks
I'm currently thinking about which version of Xen supporting in Squeeze.
There are two possibilities: 3.4 and 4.0. 3.4 is currently in testing
and unstable, 4.0 is in experimental.
Xen 3.4
===
Pros
- Proofed to be stable
Cons
- NUMA-mode only opt-in, no infos about stability
- Fails
Whoops, wrong recipient.
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 05:54:28PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> I'm currently thinking about which version of Xen supporting in Squeeze.
> There are two possibilities: 3.4 and 4.0. 3.4 is currently in testing
> and unstable, 4.0 is in experimental.
>
> Xen 3.4
> ===
Le jeudi 10 juin 2010 à 17:54 +0200, Bastian Blank a écrit :
> Xen 4.0
> ===
> Pros
> - NUMA
> - More tested with the Kernel in Squeeze
> Cons
> - Quite new
>
> My personal preference would be to go with 4.0.
Your description sounds like it will be a lot easier to support 4.0, so
unless there
Package: wnpp
Owner: Alan Haggai Alavi
Severity: wishlist
*** Please type your report below this line ***
* Package name: libdata-formvalidator-constraints-datetime-perl
Version : 1.11
Upstream Author : Michael Peters
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Data-FormVali
2010/6/10 Bastian Blank :
>> My personal preference would be to go with 4.0.
I completely agree. Probably more people will use pvops kernel with
4.0 instead 3.4, so hopefully it will be better tested.
--
Łukasz Oleś
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 06:01:27 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> My 2nd suggestion is coming from the Maemo platform (the OS behind
> the Nokia n900 that is Debian based). In Maemo, there is a "devel"
> repository that includes apps that aren't necessarily in good shape. The
> users know that fact when
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Joe Walter wrote:
> Hi to All,
>
> Please add my mail-id for web design.
>
> My mail-id:* dedicatedwebservi...@gmail.com*
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Joe Walter.
> SEO Analyst
>
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> My sponsoring preferences are available from
> http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/debian-sponsoring.html >. To
> make sure I have direct contact with the prospective package
> maintainer and avoid a backlog of packages I should have sponsored, I
> want to be contacted o
Łukasz Oleś wrote:
> 2010/6/10 Bastian Blank :
>>> My personal preference would be to go with 4.0.
>
> I completely agree. Probably more people will use pvops kernel with
> 4.0 instead 3.4, so hopefully it will be better tested.
Hi Bastian,
I have been running Xen 4.0.0 on my laptop since you ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/10/2010 06:01 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> My 2nd suggestion is coming from the Maemo platform (the OS behind
> the Nokia n900 that is Debian based). In Maemo, there is a "devel"
> repository that includes apps that
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 627 (new: 3)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 132 (new: 6)
Total number of packages request
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 05:54:28PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > I'm currently thinking about which version of Xen supporting in Squeeze.
> > There are two possibilities: 3.4 and 4.0. 3.4 is currently in testing
> > and unstable, 4.0 is in experimental
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: jo...@pobox.com
* Package name: libaudio-ecasound-perl
Version : 0.93
Upstream Author : Brad Bowman
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Audio-Ecasound
* License : Artistic
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : Perl
Russell Coker wrote:
> Based on my experience with Xen I think that we should have both. Then if
> one
> doesn't work we can try the other.
I don't think having to do a double work is a good idea.
> My impression of Xen stability is that trying two different versions and
> hoping that one wil
[3.4 vs. 4.0 ...]
>
> Based on my experience with Xen I think that we should have both. Then if
> one
> doesn't work we can try the other.
>
> My impression of Xen stability is that trying two different versions and
> hoping that one will work is a good strategy for any given server.
>
> Ba
>
> PS It would be nice if we could get Grub2 updated to boot Xen
kernels. My SE
> Linux Play Machine is offline right now because I messed up the Grub2
> configuration so badly that it won't even give me a boot menu.
>
I'm running grub from squeeze with a hand-compiled xen
4.0.1-rc. There are
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Russell Coker wrote:
> > Based on my experience with Xen I think that we should have both. Then
> > if one doesn't work we can try the other.
>
> I don't think having to do a double work is a good idea.
I agree that doubling the work is generally a b
22 matches
Mail list logo
