Re: ITA: dict-gcide

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 CA> You don't. You will be effectively maintaining a fork. You might consider CA> changing the name. RS> Sure. Looks like a good candidate to start a new project with ? RS> Especially since it contains more than 8 decades of data which can stand

elegant(?) debian topgit workflow?

CC (FYI) to git and debian-devel. see http://vcs-pkg.org Hi, would you be so kind to review my workflow proposal? branches upstream debian/*, fixes/*, features/* - topgit branches based on upstream patches - the hero master - contains the debian/ dir and is the branch we build from Al

Re: duplicate packages in Sources and Packages files

Lucas Nussbaum writes: > It is likely that other tools and scripts are affected. And there might > also be some affected packages (debmirror? APT proxies?). Certainly not debmirror. That alway had to cope with Arch:all packages being listed in each archs Packages file and the same version in sta

Re: dist-upgrade broken my X

Am Dienstag 15 Dezember 2009 16:03:13 schrieb John Wong: > After running apt-get update && apt-get -y dist-upgrade, > "apt-get" remove some package, i haven't noticed, include gdm. > now i can't login to X. > > my system info: > amd64/unstable/testing > 2.6.31-xx kernel > xfce4-xx > gdm > > I don

Re: dist-upgrade broken my X

The correct list for these questions (and any answers) is debian-u...@lists.debian.org. Please post your question there. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: dh_config_model_upgrade: package upgrade with Config::Model

Le vendredi 4 décembre 2009 12:35:30, Neil Williams a écrit : > Does Config::Model obey DEBCONF_NONINTERACTIVE_SEEN=true ? > > http://wiki.debian.org/Multistrap#Environment Once the debconf question is removed, Config::Model will be used in non- interactive mode (-ui none option) in postinst. Al

Re: dh_config_model_upgrade: package upgrade with Config::Model

Le lundi 7 décembre 2009 04:19:34, Paul Wise a écrit : > It would still be nice if the postinst snippets didn't have to be > patched for EmDebian. I imagine this would simply mean checking for > perl in the postinst and only performing configuration upgrades when > it is available. Paul, during pa

Re: dh_config_model_upgrade: package upgrade with Config::Model

On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:25:35 +0100 Dominique Dumont wrote: > Le lundi 7 décembre 2009 04:19:34, Paul Wise a écrit : > > It would still be nice if the postinst snippets didn't have to be > > patched for EmDebian. I imagine this would simply mean checking for > > perl in the postinst and only perfo

Processed: Re: Bug#561349: Login Credentials not honoured

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 561349 general Bug #561349 [otherr] otherr: login credentials aren't honoured Warning: Unknown package 'otherr' Bug reassigned from package 'otherr' to 'general'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#561349: Login Credentials not honoured

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 561349 normal Bug #561349 [general] otherr: login credentials aren't honoured Severity set to 'normal' from 'critical' > tags 561349 + moreinfo Bug #561349 [general] otherr: login credentials aren't honoured Added tag(s) moreinfo. > than

netscript-2.4 - multiple packages to better intergrate into boot sequence

Hi! I am the author of the netscript-2.4 package, and I am currently updating it to better support IPv6, and I have found that I have to better intergrate it into the boot sequence under upstart and the newer boot dependencies. Splitting into multiple packages seems to be the only way to do it, a

Re: defaulting to net.ipv6.bindv6only=1 for squeeze

On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 08:24:31PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > Applications can change the behaviour for their sockets using setsockopt > and the IPV6_V6ONLY option[2], and many already do this to prevent the > need of adjusting their configuration depending on how the system is > configured.

Processed: reassign 561068 to general

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Probably not a bug in the package; user needs help > reassign 561068 general Bug #561068 [nfs-kernel-server] nfs crashes debian Bug reassigned from package 'nfs-kernel-server' to 'general'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please con

Re: SpamAssassin is run on Alioth, but its results are ignored

On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > >> SpamAssassin is run on Alioth, but its results are ignored. > >> The spam, though detected, is not separated out from the stream. > > SG> This is isn't actually true > > $ GET http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.eeepc/2539/raw |gr

Re: SpamAssassin is run on Alioth, but its results are ignored

This one time, at band camp, jida...@jidanni.org said: > >> SpamAssassin is run on Alioth, but its results are ignored. > >> The spam, though detected, is not separated out from the stream. > > SG> This is isn't actually true > > $ GET http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.eeepc/2539/

MySQL server from backports.org issue

Maybe I can get a response with more info. I upgraded to MySQL-server 5.1.1 from stable using the backports.org apps in my sources.list & pinning them . I also upgraded all of MySql as well. I did not realize there was any difference until I tried to upgrade the backports installation & I can not d

Re: SpamAssassin is run on Alioth, but its results are ignored

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 00:12, Stephen Gran wrote: > > (I don't know why we're having this discussion on -devel, but) > > 2009-12-07 21:27:19 1NHl6v-0006Ak-OI SA: Action: flagged as Spam but > accepted: score=9.2 required=5.0 (scanned in 5/5 secs | Message-Id: > 5201899751.20091208002...@l3377l.

Re: SpamAssassin is run on Alioth, but its results are ignored

On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 01:03 +0100, Carl Fürstenberg wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 00:12, Stephen Gran wrote: > > > > (I don't know why we're having this discussion on -devel, but) > > > > 2009-12-07 21:27:19 1NHl6v-0006Ak-OI SA: Action: flagged as Spam but > > accepted: score=9.2 required=5.0

Re: Bug#561401: heimdal: FTBFS: Uses quilt in debian/rules, patches fail to apply.

Hello Debian-Devel! See bug #561401. The reporter suggests that the problem is because I use quilt in debian/rules, however I was under the impression removing quilt stuff was optional, from : "You can remove everything related

Re: Bug#561401: heimdal: FTBFS: Uses quilt in debian/rules, patches fail to apply.

Brian May writes: > See bug #561401. > The reporter suggests that the problem is because I use quilt in > debian/rules, however I was under the impression removing quilt stuff > was optional, from > : > "You can remove everyth

Re: Bug#561401: heimdal: FTBFS: Uses quilt in debian/rules, patches fail to apply.

Brian May (17/12/2009): > See bug #561401. See bug #557667? Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: SpamAssassin is run on Alioth, but its results are ignored

Re: http://news.gmane.org/group/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/thread=147634 Thank you all for your attention to this issue and allowing us to finally find people in charge for http://news.gmane.org/group/gmane.linux.debian.devel.eeepc/thread=2462 Now what is needed is for the spam threshold for

[Need Help] About file lock in Debian Sarge

Dear Debian developers I run DOVIS 2.0 (docking application) in cluster server using Debian Sarge Then I got *"Can not get init lock!"* notification here is the screenshoot [image: http://img710.imageshack.us/img710/7643/35869453.png] I already asked the developers about this problem They said

Re: unzip.h and unzip.c files in source packages.

Le Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 04:05:38PM +, Neil Williams a écrit : > > Just because a filename is reused doesn't mean that the packages > put the same code into that filename. Le Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 06:41:51PM +, Stephen Gran a écrit : > > Whether or not these are actually the same files, I

Re: [Need Help] About file lock in Debian Sarge

[Please note that this question is more appropriate for debian-user, not debian-devel.] On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:51:39AM +0700, Muhammad H Hilman wrote: > Dear Debian developers > I run DOVIS 2.0 (docking application) in cluster server using Debian Sarge > Then I got *"Can not get init lock!"*

Re: MySQL server from backports.org issue

On 17/12/2009 01:38, JW Foster wrote: Somehow the server is running and my apps seem to be running OK, but I just do not like the mess the debian developers have made of this. I also can not uninstall the server to go back to the stable version. Hiya K why dont you start by purging all the