On Fri, May 15 2009, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog writes:
>
>> CCing -policy, do we need to update policy to allow Binary: fields
>> over multiple lines?
>
> Yes. (But I certainly have no objections to doing so.)
>
>> Currently it only says that the fields are comma-separated and
>> spa
Arthur de Jong wrote:
Hello list (I've put a couple of people in Bcc to try to get more
feedback),
I'm working on integrating a PAM module into nss-ldapd and am looking
for input on this. The PAM module was kindly provided by Howard Chu from
the OpenLDAP project but I'm still working on the ser
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:26:28AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> pdebuild uses dpkg-buildpackage -S to generate a source package
> which it then copies into the chroot to do the full build.
FWIW, via cowbuilder you get _source.changes by default. So, for
instance, I started seeing those files when
On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 02:10 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> It is my recollection that each field in the control file (and
> perhaps others) was supposed to follow rfc822 (now rfc5322), and that
> says:
> ,
> |Each header field is logically a single line of characters comprisi
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 09:31:26PM +1200, Andrew McMillan wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 02:10 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >
> > It is my recollection that each field in the control file (and
> > perhaps others) was supposed to follow rfc822 (now rfc5322), and that
> > says:
> > ,--
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Bremner
* Package name: bliss
Version : 0.50
Upstream Author : Tommi Juntilla and Petteri Kaski
* URL : http://www.tcs.hut.fi/Software/bliss/index.shtml
* License : GPL2
Programming Lang: C++
Description :
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> I have been told by upstream maintainers of one of my packages and by
> prominent developers of other distributions that supporting a standalone
> /usr is too much work and no other distribution worth mentioning does it
> (not Ubuntu, not Fedora, not SuSE).
BTW, last month Len
I've been looking for a solution to the problem of duplicating my user
environment across different machines. My search has included anything
I could find between the extremes of "manual copying" to "cfengine",
but until now I've not been lucky in finding anything that integrates
nicely with Debian
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carl Chenet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: belier
Version : 0.7
Upstream Author : Carl Chenet
* URL : http://www.ohmytux.com/belier
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Descriptio
Mark Lawrence wrote:
>To include everything in your home directory you add
>a line containing ’*’. However, be aware that
>building a package requires twice the amount of space
>on the disk as the included files, so you will not be
>able
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Michał Zając"
* Package name: plasma-widget-pgame
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Kai Dombrowe
* URL : http://kde-look.org/content/show.php/PGame?content=99357
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: C++
Description
On Sat, May 16 2009, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 09:31:26PM +1200, Andrew McMillan wrote:
>> On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 02:10 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> >
>> > It is my recollection that each field in the control file (and
>> > perhaps others) was supposed to follow
Carl Chenet writes:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Carl Chenet
>
>
> * Package name: belier
> Version : 0.7
> Upstream Author : Carl Chenet
> * URL : http://www.ohmytux.com/belier
> * License : GPL
> Programming Lang: Python
> Description
Hi Rotty,
Thanks for your interest for Belier. The english documentation will be
ready for monday and I'm going to upload a package with embedded english
documentation on mentors.debian.net for the next week. I just wanted to
begin the process and that's why I opened an ITP. But definitly I won't
Hi Mark,
* [16.05.09 17:00]:
> I've been looking for a solution to the problem of duplicating my user
> environment across different machines. My search has included anything
> I could find between the extremes of "manual copying" to "cfengine",
> but until now I've not been lucky in finding anyth
On Sat May 16, 2009 at 04:20:20PM +0100, Colin Tuckley wrote:
> Mark Lawrence wrote:
>
> >To include everything in your home directory you add
> >a line containing ’*’. However, be aware that
> >building a package requires twice the amount of space
> >
Manoj Srivastava writes:
> It is my recollection that each field in the control file (and
> perhaps others) was supposed to follow rfc822 (now rfc5322), and that
> says:
Well, that's definitely not currently the case, and we just added
support for folding in 3.8.0 (IIRC) for several sp
Hi Michael,
Thanks for the info and for explaining your model.
On Sat May 16, 2009 at 06:42:35PM +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> > I've been looking for a solution to the problem of duplicating my
> > user environment across different machines. My search has included
> > anything I could find
Hi Mark,
* [17.05.09 01:35]:
> My goal or use case is not entirely limited to "duplicating _my_ user
> environment across different machines" as I wrote above. I am actualy
> seeking the ability to package up the environment of any user on any
> machine. What that gives me is a quick path to produ
Michael Stapelberg writes:
>> Interesting idea though with fetching/storing configuration files via a
>> revision control system. I think it would be worthwhile investigating
>> the use of branches to capture the differences between hosts.
> I decided against that in the first place because the a
Manoj Srivastava writes:
> I think not, since there treating a field header as a single
> logical line or as a line with continuation lines is conceptually
> indistinguishable (I do not think we need to change any code with the
> new explanation).
[…]
> The part that I want to
Ben Finney writes:
> I don't know what this “field header” is that you're referring to. Do
> you mean “field”? There's no header involved, only fields, AFAICT.
The things we're talking about (a key/value pair, basically) is called a
"header field" in RFC 5322. The header part is of course becau
22 matches
Mail list logo
