Estimados señores:
estamos realizando la presentacion de un servicio de locuciones, para
reemplazar la musica de espera de la central telefonica por un mensaje con
informacion de la empresa de ustedes.
(Tambien realizamos grabaciones de mensajes de bienvenidas, preantededores
o contestadores
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008, Robert Collins wrote:
> I wish I understood the reasoning here - putting aside the fact that
> most of the software in Debian is under a copyleft licence and so we
> *must* provide the source. Why is the source for the radio on my wifi
> card any *less* critical than the sourc
Le mardi 04 novembre 2008 à 10:23 +1100, Ben Finney a écrit :
> How does this follow? Surely if the firmware is already being
> distributed by the project, that's a *smaller* incentive to the vendor
> to change the license.
>
> The position “Your license isn't acceptable to us; please change the
>
Loïc Minier dijo [Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 03:11:18PM +0100]:
> (...)
> And if we don't require the hardware to be freely modifiable, why
> require the firmware to be so?
So we can ship it coherently with our policies?
Because users have expectations we have a way to give support to what
we ship? I
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Many thanks to José Luis Tallón for proposing to bake cookies, but there
> are already enough cookers in Spain.
Thank you for organizing this all along, and thanks to *all*
contributors, whether they fixed their bugs or not, for helping make a
better free OS for everyone.
On Mon, Nov 03 2008, Brian May wrote:
> I don't think it does matter.
>
> On a related note though, compare to hardware vendors:
>
> A) provides all firmware, in binary only form, without source code, on
> board device ROM that cannot be changed.
>
> B) provides all firmware on disk, in binary on
On Tue, Nov 04 2008, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Because I can consider the wifi firmware a subsystem which doesn't
> contaminate my main OS; there's a clear interface between the two
> systems -- it's like talking to another computer, talking to your
> hard disk, talking to your keyboard: something
Hi Michael!
On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 07:28:00 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 11:40:22PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> Where do I go from here to make sure the issue gets the appropriate
>> level of thought and consideration that it deserves (after lenny gets
>> released of cou
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008, Robert Collins wrote:
> > I wish I understood the reasoning here - putting aside the fact
> > that most of the software in Debian is under a copyleft licence
> > and so we *must* provide the source. Why is the source for the
> > radio
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le mardi 04 novembre 2008 à 10:23 +1100, Ben Finney a écrit :
> > How does this follow? Surely if the firmware is already being
> > distributed by the project, that's a *smaller* incentive to the
> > vendor to change the license.
>
> Past experience
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 15:11 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008, Robert Collins wrote:
> > I wish I understood the reasoning here - putting aside the fact that
> > most of the software in Debian is under a copyleft licence and so we
> > *must* provide the source. Why is the source for
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 504516 general
Bug#504516: libc6 package allows for a potential root compromise to users in
'staff' group
Bug reassigned from package `libc6' to `general'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
>> > Hence the question goes as: considering that the next release of
>> > Debian is most likely going to be released with Emacs (>= 23.1), which
>> > is integrated properly with EasyPG, do we need alpaca in Debian? I
>> > believe the answer is «no».
>> I think that the alpaca package isn't meaning
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> reassign 504516 tech-ctte
Bug#504516: libc6 package allows for a potential root compromise to users in
'staff' group
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `tech-ctte'.
> retitle
14 matches
Mail list logo
