Re: Terminal emulators and command line arguments (again!)

Sune Vuorela, le Mon 13 Oct 2008 05:34:25 +, a écrit : > On 2008-10-12, Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sune wrote: > >>I dont think supporting title and stuff should be required for providing > >>x-terminal-emulator. I think we could require to handle -e properly, but > >>not muc

Re: watch file problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Pierre Habouzit a écrit : > On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 07:53:22PM +, Laurent Guignard wrote: >> Hi mentors, >> >> I wrote a watch file like this : >> >> version=3 >> opts=filenamemangle=s/dhcp_probe/dhcp-probe/ \ >> http://www.net.princeton.edu/softw

Re: watch file problem

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 08:01:36AM +, Laurent Guignard wrote: > Pierre Habouzit a écrit : > > On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 07:53:22PM +, Laurent Guignard wrote: > >> Hi mentors, > >> > >> I wrote a watch file like this : > >> > >> version=3 > >> opts=filenamemangle=s/dhcp_probe/dhcp-probe/ \ > >

Re: watch file problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Pierre Habouzit a écrit : > On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 08:01:36AM +, Laurent Guignard wrote: >> Pierre Habouzit a écrit : >>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 07:53:22PM +, Laurent Guignard wrote: Hi mentors, I wrote a watch file like this :

Bug#502063: ITP: conmux -- A abstracted console multiplexor

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jean Parpaillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: conmux Version : 0r2277 Upstream Author : Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://autotest.kernel.org/wiki/Conmux * License : GPL v2 Programming Lang: Perl

Re: watch file problem

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 12:57:06PM +0200, Laurent Guignard wrote: > Sorry, but i thought that uscan was done to scan according to the watch > file... > > Irwin Tillman (upstream coder) sent me this url : > http://www.net.princeton.edu/software/dhcp_probe/dhcp_probe-1.2.2a.tar.gz > > that is activ

Bug#502121: ITP: sreadahead -- Super Read Ahead

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Julian Andres Klode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: sreadahead Version : 0.02 Upstream Author : Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.moblin.org/projects/fast-boot * License : GPL-2 Programming Lan

Re: Bug#502021: ITP: etoolbox -- Toolbox for LaTeX class and package authors

* Jan Hauke Rahm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-12 21:57]: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Jan Hauke Rahm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA224 > > * Package name: etoolbox > Version : 1.7 > Upstream Author : Philipp Lehmann > * UR

Re: Lenny upgrade-advisor

Hello, I have re-worked upgrade-advisor to make it pluggable. Also it's now hosted on collab-maint[1]. This should make it easier for anyone to submit a plug-in that detects and warns potential issues. How it works Before upgrading, running `upgrade-advisor pre-upgrade` will : * Repo

Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, autumn 2008

On Monday 13 October 2008 19:35:16 Ben Armstrong wrote: > Ath5k wifi works on Eee PC in Linux 2.6.27 > >Jean-Christophe reports that [2]ath5k works in Linux 2.6.27 on >the Eee PC 701, and just needs a [3]small patch to work with our >eeepc-acpi-scripts package. This is good news for tho

Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, autumn 2008

On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 02:00:29 +0200 Matteo Croce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 13 October 2008 19:35:16 Ben Armstrong wrote: > > Ath5k wifi works on Eee PC in Linux 2.6.27 > > > >Jean-Christophe reports that [2]ath5k works in Linux 2.6.27 on > >the Eee PC 701, and just needs a [3]sm

Bug#502156: ITP: python-django-diario -- A Django application that implements a simple blog system

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Lincoln de Sousa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: python-django-diario Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Guilherme Mesquita Gondim (semente) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://code.google.com/p/django-diario/ * License :

Re: Rejuvenated kernel-package uploaded to unstable, please test

Manoj wrote: > It correctly installs firmware in a versioned location under > /lib/firmware. Problem is that even though this may avoid package conflicts, it is *not* correct given the way Debian currently looks for firmware. Also, it is not the way upstream recommends to install firmware. All

kernel 2.6.27 in lenny?

Hi, considering that Adrian Bunk announced long time support for kernel 2.6.27 (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/743377) wouldn't it be a good idea to take kernel 2.6.27 as the stable kernel in lenny? PJ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Re: kernel 2.6.27 in lenny?

On mar, 2008-10-14 at 07:59 +0200, Peter Jordan wrote: > wouldn't it > be a good idea to take kernel 2.6.27 as the stable kernel in lenny? If we want to release lenny before 2.6.27 is not supported anymore, maybe it's not? -- Yves-Alexis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed me

Re: Rejuvenated kernel-package uploaded to unstable, please test

On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Problem is that even though this may avoid package conflicts, it is *not* > correct given the way Debian currently looks for firmware. Also, it is > not the way upstream recommends to install firmware. > > All (non-free) Debi

Re: Rejuvenated kernel-package uploaded to unstable, please test

On Mon, Oct 13 2008, Frans Pop wrote: > Manoj wrote: >> It correctly installs firmware in a versioned location under >> /lib/firmware. > > Problem is that even though this may avoid package conflicts, it is > *not* correct given the way Debian currently looks for firmware. Also, > it is not the wa