Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> reassign 484308 buildd.emdebian.org
Bug#484308: Lack of source packages in Emdebian toolchain and cross repositories
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `buildd.emdebian.org'.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> reassign 480515 buildd.emdebian.org
Bug#480515: buildd.emdebian.org: gconf unable to be uploaded, libldap-2.4-2
failed to cross build
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `build
Hello,
Regarding the wiki page NewInLenny[1] and the possibility to reuse it's
content in the Release Notes, I'm wondering what's the actual license
that apply to the R.N ?
We would have two option to migrate the wiki page license :
1. Ask each contributor to re-license his contribution under lic
Hi,
On 8/20/2008 10:53:10 PM, you were invited to join Prof Swapan Garain's UNYK
address book so he/she would always have access to your contact info and you to
his/hers.
To accept his/her request, Click here.
http://www.unyk.com/ml/65/5/?i=84006383ece6448a8c0491d27df1be41
UNY
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 495295 debian-i18n
Bug#495295: i18n.debian.org: [DDTP] Rename language code "km_KH" to "km"
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `debian-i18n'.
> reassign 495294 debian-i18n
Bug#495294: i18n.debian.org: [DDTP] Remove wrong language code 'g
On 2008-09-03 09:27, Franklin PIAT wrote:
> Regarding the wiki page NewInLenny[1] and the possibility to reuse it's
> content in the Release Notes, I'm wondering what's the actual license
> that apply to the R.N ?
We are currently asking all contributors to agree to GPL2
(unfortunately without the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 464551 usbutils
Bug#464551: general: USB devices missing in lsusb
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `usbutils'.
> tags 464551 +moreinfo
Bug#464551: general: USB devices missing in lsusb
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> th
reassign 464551 usbutils
tags 464551 +moreinfo
thanks
Hi Rafael,
you submitted this issue in February, are your devices correctly displayed by
lsusb nowadays?
regards,
Holger, udev+linux-2.6 were other reassign candidates and if the
submitter
doesnt reply in 14 days I suggest close ;
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 311868 debtags
Bug#311868: base: Packages do not indicate whether installing them changes
system operation
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `debtags'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debi
Your message dated Wed, 3 Sep 2008 10:29:53 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line "How 'bout just filing wishlist bugs with patches?"
has caused the Debian Bug report #170472,
regarding info: top Info pages of different packages wildly differ
to be marked as done.
This means
reassign 311868 debtags
thanks
Hi,
I read in this bugreport that it would be a good idea to use debtags to
indicate whether a package installs remotely accessable services or not. (The
other modifications suggested in this bugreport are mostly prohibited by
policy)
Does such a tag exist? If s
Salut très cher,
Suite a mes profondes recherches sur le net que je suis arrivé a vous
extraire
parmi tant d'adresse .Je suis
de la nationalité Canadienne ,je me
nomme Celine CARIER .Vous savez chez nous, l'amitié est très
précieuse. La rencontre d'une personne nous apporte toujours quelque
Hey,
Has anyone looked at packaging Chromium for Debian yet?
http://code.google.com/chromium/
http://dev.chromium.org/developers/
http://src.chromium.org/svn/trunk/src/chrome/
Looks like a 3-clause BSD, was going to check out the code and scour it for
potential DFSG issues but my downlink
2008/9/3 Noah Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hey,
>
> Has anyone looked at packaging Chromium for Debian yet?
>
> http://code.google.com/chromium/
> http://dev.chromium.org/developers/
> http://src.chromium.org/svn/trunk/src/chrome/
>
> Looks like a 3-clause BSD, was going to check out the code a
Noah Slater wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Has anyone looked at packaging Chromium for Debian yet?
>
> http://code.google.com/chromium/
> http://dev.chromium.org/developers/
> http://src.chromium.org/svn/trunk/src/chrome/
>
> Looks like a 3-clause BSD, was going to check out the code and scour it for
>
Em Qua, 2008-09-03 às 15:17 +0200, Miriam Ruiz escreveu:
> 2008/9/3 Noah Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Has anyone looked at packaging Chromium for Debian yet?
> I've downloaded it and started to play with the code. It doesn't work
> yet neither in Linux, nor in 64 bits.
A friend of mine reported
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 02:13:34PM +0100, Noah Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Has anyone looked at packaging Chromium for Debian yet?
>
> http://code.google.com/chromium/
> http://dev.chromium.org/developers/
> http://src.chromium.org/svn/trunk/src/chrome/
>
> Looks like a 3-
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 10:32:12AM -0300, Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva wrote:
> A friend of mine reported[0] a successful build in Debian.
[...]
> https://listas.dcc.ufmg.br/pipermail/grad041/2008-September/022464.html
> It sais: I compiled it here nicely in Debian. I had only to change a
> little
Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva wrote:
Em Qua, 2008-09-03 às 15:17 +0200, Miriam Ruiz escreveu:
2008/9/3 Noah Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Has anyone looked at packaging Chromium for Debian yet?
I've downloaded it and started to play with the code. It doesn't work
yet neither in Linu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 387446 -patch
Bug#387446: amd64 system not compliant with FHS
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Your message dated Wed, 3 Sep 2008 17:11:10 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #356930,
regarding general: X adding bad info in last -d -i
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Wed, 3 Sep 2008 17:14:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing this 5 year old bug about a rootkit on someones
computer :-)
has caused the Debian Bug report #199653,
regarding SIGCHLD being ignored somewhere
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Your message dated Wed, 3 Sep 2008 17:15:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line global proxy configuration is there
has caused the Debian Bug report #140230,
regarding general: Ad-hoc proxy configuration
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Wed, 3 Sep 2008 17:14:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing this 5 year old bug about a rootkit on someones
computer :-)
has caused the Debian Bug report #199653,
regarding apt-get update fails to get index package list and therefore does
nothi
Without more information, I would think the "Waited, for gzip but it wasn't
there" message meant that gzip wasn't installed.
"apt-get install gzip" should have fixed that, should it not?
- Lawrence
On Wednesday, September 3, 2008 12:51:07 pm Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Waited, for gzip
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 17:11:10 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> closing this old bug (it was filed before etch was released) an the
> assumptions that a.) I dont see this bug on my etch systems and b.) a lot has
> changed in Xorg since then.
>
That would be the display manager, not X, i
Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 02:13:34PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote:
>>
>> Has anyone looked at packaging Chromium for Debian yet?
>>
> I would advise anyone interested in packaging Chromium to not consider
> it before Lenny release and help fixing the annoying RC bugs in
> iceweasel/x
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 01:03:58PM -0230, Lawrence Williams wrote:
> Without more information, I would think the "Waited, for gzip but it wasn't
> there" message meant that gzip wasn't installed.
>
> "apt-get install gzip" should have fixed that, should it not?
Think again :-)
Hint: man 5 deb
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 05:44:45PM +0200, Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 02:13:34PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote:
> >>
> >> Has anyone looked at packaging Chromium for Debian yet?
> >>
> > I would advise anyone interested in packaging Chromium
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 12:01 AM, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want fun, too. Maybe I should orphan these packages.
Please try the chromium package already in Debian instead.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
Hi Lawrence,
On Wednesday 03 September 2008 17:33, Lawrence Williams wrote:
> Without more information, I would think the "Waited, for gzip but it wasn't
> there" message meant that gzip wasn't installed.
read the merged bugreport 199653.
regards,
Holger
pgpQbAiWhFQP7.pgp
Description:
Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 05:44:45PM +0200, Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Mike Hommey wrote:
>>> I would advise anyone interested in packaging Chromium to not consider
>>> it before Lenny release and help fixing the annoying RC bugs in
>>> iceweasel/xulrunner ins
Urg..., as titled.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 01:23 Thu 04 Sep , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jjo> Urg..., as titled.
bug #50 has been posted? ;)
--
. ''`. Dmitry E. Oboukhov
: :’ : email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber://[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `~’ GPGKey: 1024D / F8E26537 2006-11-21
`- 1B23 D4
新款上市囉peridotite
針織系列 別家賣390元 我們只賣120元唷
款式眾多 歡迎團購 批發
http://tw.f5.page.bid.yahoo.com/tw/auction/e28120355?u=may26tw
雅虎首頁 - 搜 尋 ~~莓莓批發~~ 就能找到唷q, O, 1
___
雅虎邮箱，您的终生邮箱！
http://cn.mail.yahoo.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 10:06 +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> On 2008-09-03 09:27, Franklin PIAT wrote:
> > Regarding the wiki page NewInLenny[1] and the possibility to reuse it's
> > content in the Release Notes, I'm wondering what's the actual license
> > that apply to the R.N ?
>
> We are curre
36 matches
Mail list logo
