martin f krafft wrote:
Anything else? Do you know of packages that rely on this
functionality? Do you have scripts of your own which modify the
environment? Would you please be so kind as to explain to me what
they do, and help me figure out whether there isn't a better way for
them?
My sugge
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libb-perlreq-perl
Version : 0.6.8
Upstream Author : Alexey Tourbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/rpm-build-perl/
* License : GPL-2+
Programming
Dear list,
for some reason, Debian favors Gnome to be the default desktop.
My reason for using KDE is mainly Gnomes file browser. But as a
matter of fact, major applications are using the GTK2 libraries
(Mozilla, Openoffice.org, Gimp, Audacity etc.) - and Opneoffice.org is
the only one that allo
"Francisco Moya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I believed buildd.debian.org was meant to build only binary-arch packages.
>
> But in recent build logs of the zeroc-ice package:
> http://buildd.debian.org/build.cgi?pkg=zeroc-ice;ver=3.3.0-4
> I found buildd tried to build a binary-indep pac
Dear Rudi,
On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 03:12:56PM +0200, Rudi Effe wrote:
> Now, what's wrong with the GTK2 file chooser? I will report a bug if
> anybody could name the package/library I have to refer to.
This list is for Debian development. Please write to debian-user for
support on how to figure
On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 03:31:40PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> buildd calls sbuild, sbuild calls dpkg-buildpackage, dpkg-buildpackage
> calls "clean", "build" and " binary-arch".
That's " clean", of course, which is usually how packages manage to
mangle chroots on buildds that use sudo ra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear ftpmaster (cc debian-devel),
On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 04:53:42PM +, Mark Hymers wrote:
>Dear Maintainer,
>
>This package has been rejected because of the Depend: on libversion-perl
>which is no longer in unstable or testing. If you wish to up
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 06:34:46PM -0700, Jonathan Lassoff wrote:
>
>I've found that while ozymandns is useful for tunneling some things
>in a pinch, I've had a lot more luck with running iodine as a daemon
>and might suggest checking it out.
Oh, absolutely - that's what I use now and it's much mo
On Sat, 09, Aug, 2008 at 07:26:56PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard spoke thus..
> I am perfectly aware that libversion-perl is available only as a virtual
> package in unstable and testing. I deliberately chose to use those
> virtual packages in order to ease backporting to Debian stable.
>
> I was un
On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 15:12:56 +0200, Rudi Effe wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> for some reason, Debian favors Gnome to be the default desktop. My
> reason for using KDE is mainly Gnomes file browser. But as a matter of
> fact, major applications are using the GTK2 libraries (Mozilla,
> Openoffice.org, Gim
On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 15:12:56 +0200, Rudi Effe wrote:
> (2) there is no option to sort by size or to even display size.
> maybe this must be enabled by the calling app (audacity here) - but
> if this option is not diallowed explicitly, it should be possible to
> add it by the browsing u
Hello,
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 04:53:42PM +, Mark Hymers wrote:
>> This package has been rejected because of the Depend: on libversion-perl
>> which is no longer in unstable or testing. If you wish to upload this
>> package, you will either need to not depend on i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 06:38:35PM +0100, Mark Hymers wrote:
>On Sat, 09, Aug, 2008 at 07:26:56PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard spoke thus..
>> I am perfectly aware that libversion-perl is available only as a virtual
>> package in unstable and testing. I d
On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 09:14:22PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> Could you perhaps, now that I got your attention (he he) process the
> next cipux packages a little quicker? I have 6 more packages (each
> build-depending on each other so cannot go in at once without cheating),
> and waiti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Vincent,
On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 09:06:24PM +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 04:53:42PM +, Mark Hymers wrote:
>>> This package has been rejected because of the Depend: on
>>> libversion-perl w
On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 21:06:24 +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> > I am perfectly aware that libversion-perl is available only as a virtual
> > package in unstable and testing. I deliberately chose to use those
> > virtual packages in order to ease backporting to Debian stable.
> ftpmasters repl
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 06:41:46AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 06:05:20PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Michael Banck a écrit :
> > > On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 05:49:04AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > >> There is a bug upstream, but marked as invalid:
> > >>
> > >>
On Sat, 09, Aug, 2008 at 09:14:22PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard spoke thus..
> Could you perhaps, now that I got your attention (he he) process the
> next cipux packages a little quicker? I have 6 more packages (each
> build-depending on each other so cannot go in at once without cheating),
> and w
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: polyml
Version : 5.2
Upstream Author : David Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.polyml.org/index.html
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: Standard ML
Description : Sta
On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 11:45:49PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> * Package name: polyml
> Version : 5.2
> Upstream Author : David Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.polyml.org/index.html
> * License : GPLv2
Sorry, that's LGPLv2.1 or later, n
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: isabelle
Version : 2008
Upstream Author : University of Cambridge (Larry Paulson), Technische
Universitaet Muenchen (Tobias Nipkow, Makarius Wenzel)
* URL
Hi,
I've just started to do research in order to write a tool which I was
always missing. What I have so far is just a brief "background"
information, explaining the problem - see below.
I thought it might be good to ask here if I'm not trying to reinvent
something that already exists. Or maybe s
22 matches
Mail list logo
