Hello folks,
i tried to make a chroot for sid this morning. the command i used is the
following:
cdebootstrap -v --flavour=minimal sid /sid http://ftp.debian.org/debian/
i got the following message:
O: The following NEW packages will be installed:
O: apt-utils
O: 0 upgraded, 1 newly ins
Charles Plessy wrote:
> Thanks for the answer, I just opened a bug on the Policy to reflect
> this.
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=491985
I do have to agree with Russ that policy isn't the place for this.
Why do you need to sprinkle information there instead of enhancing the
On 22/07/08 at 17:58 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Yeah, great idea! Let's start Debian subdistros for every specific use
> > one can think of. This whole "universal operating system" idea is so
> > old. What about gebian, kebian, xebian?
>
> Would it
SUPERVISORES EFICACES - MEJORANDO EL DESEMPEÑO DE LOS SUPERVISORES
Agosto 06 y 07, 2008 - 17:00 a 21:30 hrs.
Centro de Convenciones Hotel María Angola
OBJETIVOS
Actualizar la preparación de los participantes para modernizar su desempeño
como Supervisores Eficaces, dotándoles de las nuevas filos
I just submitted #492027 with a patch to dh_desktop which will hardcode
the path in most existing desktop files.
Cheers,
--
.''`.
: :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
`-our own. Resi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: atl1e
Version : 1.0.0.7r5
Upstream Author : xiong huang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://marc.info/?t=12160065951&r=1&w=2
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Desc
On Mon Jul 21 14:07, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > I do feed info upstream (via yet more website logins), I really can't
> > > > add yet another one.
>
> > > I guess OpenID support will come to the rescue here.
>
> > It will help, if one wants to use the web interface. However,
> > Launchpad acc
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: r-other-genabel
Version : 1.4-0
Upstream Author : Yurii Aulchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://mga.bionet.nsc.ru/nlru/GenABEL/
* License : GPL 2+
Programming Lang
Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Given that Ubuntu takes things directly from Debian, and hence all
> Debian Developers have a vested interest in Ubuntu packages, would it
> make sense to (provide|ask ubuntu to provide) a way for bug reports to
> be manipulated by users with keys in t
On Wed Jul 23 16:13, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Given that Ubuntu takes things directly from Debian, and hence all
> > Debian Developers have a vested interest in Ubuntu packages, would it
> > make sense to (provide|ask ubuntu to provide) a way for
Hi Nicolas,
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 06:18:43 Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Disclaimer: I've been pretty busy recently, not giving my Debian
> > packages the care and love they deserve. That's why I'm now asking for
> > help, somewhat late...
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 03:35:35P
Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed Jul 23 16:13, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Given that Ubuntu takes things directly from Debian, and hence all
>> > Debian Developers have a vested interest in Ubuntu packages, would it
>> > make
Walter Franzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to make aegis ready for lenny and it currently fails on
> amd64 (nautilus), but the problem seems related to the environment
> being somewhat broken. What's the best method to contact the person(s)
> responsible for nautilus?
N
On Wed,23.Jul.08, 16:36:39, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> My point is that I don't have the impression that Debian Developers want
> to have an LP account activated at all, so IMO it doesn't really matter
> if the account is activated implicitly via some (authenticated) action
> or exlicitly by click
Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Moving from /var/www to /srv/www gains nothing - We would still have
> all webservers throwing files where they are not supposed to, to a
> user-managed directory.
There's a large difference between Debian as a whole violating the FHS
by using a nonstandard top-level director
Hi!
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 01:04:45AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> right but still no excuse to bring in a patch set that is *known*
> to not be merged upstream.
with our current options, loosing xen dom0 support IS a very good
excuse for this, IMO.
Best regards
Frederik Schüler
--
ENOS
FHS:
| Applications must generally not add directories to the top level of /var. Such
| directories should only be added if they have some system-wide implication,
and
| in consultation with the FHS mailing list.
Stephen Gran wrote:
> /var/www is not actually explicitly forbidden, just implicitly
Steve Langasek wrote:
> And even if LP accepted other openid providers, one would still have to log
> in to LP the first time in order to configure which openid provider to use,
> which I guess is still going to be more effort than some are interested in
> doing. :)
I've seen websites get openid w
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 12:15:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > And even if LP accepted other openid providers, one would still have to log
> > in to LP the first time in order to configure which openid provider to use,
> > which I guess is still going to be more effort than
Loïc Minier wrote:
> Would it be wrong to ship different flavors of the Debian CDs based on
> various upstream software?
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/4.0_r3/i386/iso-cd/debian-40r3-i386-kde-CD-1.iso
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/4.0_r3/i386/iso-cd/debian-40r3-i386-xfce-CD-1.iso
--
Joey Hess dijo [Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:59:05AM -0400]:
> Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > Moving from /var/www to /srv/www gains nothing - We would still have
> > all webservers throwing files where they are not supposed to, to a
> > user-managed directory.
>
> There's a large difference between Debian as
Michael Banck wrote:
> Also, we should probably include window decorations to not make the
> screenshot look funny
I don't buy that a screenshot without window decorations somehow looks
funny. However, if an implementation wants to, it can decorate a
screenshot at display time with whatever decora
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 05:24:44PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> Before people submit dozens of screenshots all looking slightly
> different, I suggest first deciding on some standards, like making sure
> screenshots use the default GTK or Qt theme Debian uses.
Back when I was involved in the Ubu
Quoth Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 2008-07-23 12:45:03 -0400:
> I don't buy that a screenshot without window decorations somehow
> looks funny.
One data point: a screenshot with no window decorations loses a small
amount of information, primarily the caption used for the window.
Interesting w
[Kel Modderman]
> There is no need to modify README.Debian instructions, as insserv
> package provides an update-rc.d wrapper. When the admin follows the
> existing instructions of "update-rc.d athcool start 20 2 3 4 5 ."
> you will get runlevel links, just that the sequence number 20 is
> ignored
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
> I think that there's room for Debian to establish distro-wide policies
> for the *default* directories in /srv, as a suppliment to the FHS.
I don't see the need for taking the risk of FHS non-compliance.
Why not use a new package for such policies?
e.g
Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This would effectivly mean activating the respective LP account [1] and
> associating the respective gpg key with that account. This would be of
> course doable, but given from this and previous discussions, I do not
> have the impression that this is
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: qmmp
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Ilya Kotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/qmmp/
* License : GPLv2+
Programming Lang: C++
Descripti
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: r-cran-combinat
Version : 0.0-6
* URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/combinat
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: R
Description : GNU R package providing ut
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: r-cran-genetics
Version : 1.3.3
* URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/genetics
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C, R
Description : GNU R package for popul
Hi Kel,
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:55:04PM +1000, Kel Modderman wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Just add the LSB header with correct information like:
>
> ### BEGIN INIT INFO
> # Provides: athcool
> # Required-Start:$remote_fs
> # Required-Stop: $remote_fs
> # Default-Start: 2 3 4
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:52 PM, Nicolas Boullis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for asking a potentially stupid question, but how does the
> "Default-Start" keyword affect the bahvior of the system?
Refer to http://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts for details. Maybe this
page should be updated
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: r-cran-haplo.stats
Version : 1.3.8
* URL :
http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/haplo.stats/index.html,
http://mayoresearch.mayo.edu/mayo/research/schaid_lab/software.cfm
* L
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: r-cran-qvalue
Version : 1.1
* URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/qvalue
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: R
Description : Q-value estimation for false di
Hello,
(please CC me, I am not subscribed.)
During a regular upgrade of my laptop (follows lenny) I have seen these
messages:
Se pregătește înlocuirea lui linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64 2.6.25-6 (folosind
.../linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64_2.6.25-7_amd64.deb) ...
*** This build of Glib was compiled
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:53:14AM -0500, Drake Wilson wrote:
> One data point: a screenshot with no window decorations loses a small
> amount of information, primarily the caption used for the window.
> Interesting ways of working around this might involve storing the
> caption as metadata, or sto
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 01:31:52AM +0300, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> During a regular upgrade of my laptop (follows lenny) I have seen these
> messages:
Looks like the same issue discussed earlier in the week.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/07/msg00643.html
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D
Quoth Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 2008-07-24 00:33:01 +0200:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:53:14AM -0500, Drake Wilson wrote:
> > One data point: a screenshot with no window decorations loses a small
> > amount of information, primarily the caption used for the window.
> > Interesting
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 12:15:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > I've seen websites get openid wrong in a variety of amusing ways,
> > but on reasonable implementations, you generally indicate your
> > openid provider by trying your openid into the openid
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:36:01PM +0300, Teodor wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:52 PM, Nicolas Boullis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sorry for asking a potentially stupid question, but how does the
> > "Default-Start" keyword affect the bahvior of the system?
>
> Refer to http://wiki.de
Le Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:21:27AM +0200, Thomas Viehmann a écrit :
>
> Why do you need to sprinkle information there instead of enhancing the
> documentation on the subject already in the developer's reference?
Dear Thomas,
I need to eat, drink, breeze, but I do not feel a particular need to
sp
Recently, this happened:
1. A .deb in which I have an interest, but of which I am
not the maintainer, had its binary package name changed.
So far so good. (In fact I actually approve of the change.)
However, then:
2. The maintainer of this package discovered that its testing
propagati
Say pieces on a board, make each a pair with another piece.
like...
|55|44|66|
|44|66|55|
so figure out how a piece can move.
pick any piece, try to move it somewhere.
when you move a piece you have to move it's pair at the same time.
when you move to a piece it's pair has to move at the same t
Drake Wilson wrote:
>
> Well, there's a difference between "one application is one window" and
> "one screenshot is one window"; if you have multiple windows in a
> single screenshot then you have to have the decorations so that you
> can tell them apart, so none of the above comes into play.
One
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Waite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: apollo
Version : 1.8.0
Upstream Author :
* URL : http://lucene.apache.org/solr/
* License : GPL, Apache 2.0, CDDL 1.0, BSD, MIT
Programming Lang: (C, C++, C#, Perl, Python,
45 matches
Mail list logo
