Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: openturns
Version: 0.12.0
Upstream Author:
- Électricité de France (EDF), the main electricity generation and
distribution company in France;
-
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 09:53:30PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 12/07/08 at 18:50 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > Because some packages FTBFS, there are some missing build logs[3], and
> > because there are some manpage warnings that are/not found either on
> > lintian.d.o's results or the
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Manuel Prinz wrote:
>
>> With these fixes it still did not build on my system. I needed to change
>> the Build-Depends on lib64z1-dev into zlib1g-dev to get it to build in a
>> clean pbuilder chroot.
>
> Well, I guess that lib64z1-de
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 09:53:25PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> What are the plans for Xen for lenny? Is this situation likely to change
>> before the release?
>
> It will ship the hypervisor and a domU kernel. For dom0 it will need
> either the etch
On 12/07/08 at 19:39 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 12:10:28AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > We (Debian) should make a clear statement that users of Debian as dom0
> > will have at least one supported configuration at any time during the
> > lenny lifetime.
>
> What I do
On 15/07/08 at 10:33 +0100, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 09:53:30PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 12/07/08 at 18:50 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > > Because some packages FTBFS, there are some missing build logs[3], and
> > > because there are some manpage warnings that
On Tuesday 15 July 2008 13:08, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> How/if we will support Xen in lenny is more a policy decision than a
> technical decision, even if it has important technical aspects.
>
> Even if it's not optimal, I agree with do-ocracy for technical
> decisions. However, using it for everyth
On 15/07/08 at 14:01 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Xen is just one solution to virtualisation. I may agree that a general
> decision to support virtualisation on Debian could be a policy decision, but
> whether we'll support one specific technology, for which there are many
> alternatives, is
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 01:08:23PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 12/07/08 at 19:39 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 12:10:28AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > We (Debian) should make a clear statement that users of Debian as dom0
> > > will have at least one supported
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 09:53:25PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> What are the plans for Xen for lenny? Is this situation likely to change
> before the release?
As we have seen, there is no real plan. So lets summarize the
possibilities:
Option 1: Use alternatives
==
Well,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libpetal-utils-perl
Version : 0.06
Upstream Author : William McKee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Steve Purkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Peta
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 15/07/08 at 14:01 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> - KVM: is very promising but is it really a valid alternative *now*
> for current Xen users?
That is an interesting question. We are doing some research on that
topic right now. I've migrated some VMware and xen stuff
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 02:54:09PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 15/07/08 at 14:01 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > Xen is just one solution to virtualisation. I may agree that a general
> > decision to support virtualisation on Debian could be a policy decision,
> > but
> > whether we'll s
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Enrico Tassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: lua-base64
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
* URL : http://www.tecgraf.puc-rio.br/~lhf/ftp/lua/#lbase64
* License : Public Domain
Programming L
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 05:22:55PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> One big difference between Xen and KVM is the fact that KVM always requires
> hardware virtualization (HVM) support from the CPU.
It uses the the qemu device emulation code, which is security wise one
large catastrophe. Okay, Xen
> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:56:47 +0800
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Bug#490857: ITP: watermelons -- watermelon bouncing game
> CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 3:43 AM, Peter De Wachter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 08:05:21 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:56:47 +0800
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Bug#490857: ITP: watermelons -- watermelon bouncing game
> > CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> >
> >
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kov Chai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: sunpinyin-slm
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Lei Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/input-method
* License : LGPL/CDDL Dual license
Prog
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi people.
Policy 11.8.5.1 says:
"If one or more of the fonts so packaged are
necessary for proper operation of the package with which they are
associated the font
package may be Recommended; if the fonts merely provide an
enhancement, a Suggests
rel
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 09:24:08AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 15/07/08 at 14:01 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > - KVM: is very promising but is it really a valid alternative *now*
> > for current Xen users?
>
> That is an interesting question. We are doing some
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 09:24:08AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
>
> Xensource has a developer working on getting xen patches ported to Linux
> pv_ops framework and integrated into upstream (vanilla) kernel.
That is, to me, only mildly encouraging. 2.6.18 came out on Sept.
Thanks to everyone for their comments.
Thinking a little bit more, I believe writing some kind of report might be
of more use. Of course if I find something really relevant I might end up
filing a couple of bugs (I remember seeing something that looked like a
library name being changed in the reb
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 12/07/08 at 18:50 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> Because some packages FTBFS, there are some missing build logs[3], and
>> because there are some manpage warnings that are/not found either on
>> lintian.d.o's results or the archive rebuild's results I can't even
>> es
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 13:43:05 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Hope nobody will object if the report is sent in the next Misc Developer
> News :).
>
It doesn't need to be on -devel-announce. Just send it here.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Because some packages FTBFS, there are some missing build logs[3], and
>> because there are some manpage warnings that are/not found either on
>> lintian.d.o's results or the archive rebuild's results I can't even
>> estimate
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 12:49:07PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 09:24:08AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
>
> >
> > Xensource has a developer working on getting xen patches ported to Linux
> > pv_ops framework and integrated into upstream (vanilla) k
Heya World,
I just did the requested switch, sysklogd/klogd are now priority extra,
rsyslog (not its -mysql -pgsql packages) are now priority important.
If something else, like Tasks or so, needs to be changed too: Whoever
needs to do that please do it. Thanks.
--
bye, Joerg
[ New Maintainer Pr
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 15/07/08 at 14:01 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>> Xen is just one solution to virtualisation. I may agree that a general
>> decision to support virtualisation on Debian could be a policy decision, but
>> whether we'll support one specific technolo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Andres Klode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: mayanna
Version : 0.2.8
Upstream Author : Seif Lotfy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and others
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/mayanna/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Pyt
Hi,
Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> Some of them: fontconfig-config, blender, openjdk-6-jre,
> openoffice.org-core, vlc. And, as I understand, it leads to 93 bugs of
> "serious" severity and yet another pain for release team.
ttf-opensymbol comes out of openoffice.org itself (easily checkable) and i
[Eugene V. Lyubimkin]
> Should I mass-file the bugs or this situation can be resolved
> through different approach?
Your message was a bit short on exactly what problem you are trying to
solve. How is the font dependency affecting users of the packages? I
suspect fontconfig-config work on the f
Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ttf-opensymbol comes out of openoffice.org itself (easily checkable) and
> is needed for basic operation. You won't get any bullet in OOos lists
> without it.
Even if you're running an X font server on a different host that is
providing that font? Doe
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alexander GQ Gerasiov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: qutim
Upstream Author : Rustam Chakin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.qutim.org/
* License : GPL v2 or later
Programming Lang: C++
Description : new instant me
2008/7/15 Eugene V. Lyubimkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Then I searched the Debian archive (in case of TrueType fonts):
>
> $ grep-aptavail -F Depends "ttf-" -s Package | wc -l
> 93
>
> $ grep-aptavail \( -F Recommends "ttf-" --or -F Suggests "ttf-" \)
> - --and ! -F Depends "ttf-" -s Package | wc -l
[dropping -release from Cc]
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 15:11:44 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > ttf-opensymbol comes out of openoffice.org itself (easily checkable) and
> > is needed for basic operation. You won't get any bullet in OOos lists
> > withou
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008, Neil Williams wrote:
> 1. gtk+2.0 fails to cross-build because the patches now try to build the
> udeb which comes up against a bug in dpkg-cross. I've uploaded the
> new version (including a couple of other bug fixes) today. (A late
> problem in apt-cross has delayed things s
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: mumps
Version: 4.7.3
Author: Patrick Amestoy et al.
License: public domain
URL: http://mumps.enseeiht.fr/
Description: MUltifrontal Massively Parallel sparse direct Solver
MUMPS implements a direct solver for large sparse linear systems, with a
parti
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: biojava-live
Version : 1.6.0
* URL : http://www.biojava.org
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Java API to develop tools for bioinformatics resea
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 05:22:55PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> Hopefully Jeremy Fitzhardinge (from Xensource) and others can get the
> important Xen kernel features ported to pv_ops framework and integrated
> into vanilla linus kernels soon..
>
> Status/todo:
> http://wiki.xensource.com/xen
39 matches
Mail list logo
