Re: How to build only linux-image-2.6.18-6-686

On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 22:31:09 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) wrote: >On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 10:14:09PM +0200, Mauro Ziliani wrote: >> Hi all. >> I need to rebuild only the linux-image-2.6.18-6-686 deb package from >> source code. >> How can I do that without rebuild all packages in lin

Re: How to build only linux-image-2.6.18-6-686

Hi Marc, On Saturday 07 June 2008 11:51, Marc Haber wrote: > Shouldn't that be easier to do, Send patches?! ;) > and - most of all - documented? http://wiki.debian.org/HowToRebuildAnOfficialDebianKernelPackage regards, Holger pgprFz3NRVvRf.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Automatic debiian installation

[sorry for cross-posting, I guess this thread should move away from debian-devel, but I'm not subscribed to any of the others] > Hello, > > I would like to use a system to install automatically all my debian pc. > But > i don't know wich could be the best between FAI and PRESSEED. > > Somebody co

Bug#484982: ITP: libdlna -- A reference DLNA implementation for Linux

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Rob Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libdlna Version : 0.2.3 Upstream Author : Benjamin Zores <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://libdlna.geexbox.org/ * License : LGPL Programming Lang: C Description : A

Re: How to build only linux-image-2.6.18-6-686

On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 11:51:04AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > Shouldn't that be easier to do, and - most of all - documented? Playing with source packages isn't normal. It used to be much worse (2.6.8 in sarge involved building multiple packages, one which depended on the other). The package is

Packaging a project using cmake

Hi there, I am working on cleaning up the packaging of my project (GDCM) using cmake so that the .deb produced is consistant with the debian package. I was wondering if anyone had done the work before ? I am currently struggling on how to do it properly when installing python module (what is the

Re: Packaging a project using cmake

On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 06:04:53PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > I am working on cleaning up the packaging of my project (GDCM) using > cmake so that the .deb produced is consistant with the debian package. Not sure what you mean here, a .deb is a debian package, so what is needed to be cons

Re: Changes to the ddpo-by-mail service

Raphael Geissert wrote: > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >> Raphael Hertzog wrote: >>> And the fact that he sends one mail per e-mail instead of one mail per >>> package makes it even better (far less annoying). >> Agreed, specially for people or teams who maintain lots of packages. >> >> Raphael

Re: Packaging a project using cmake

On 2008-06-07, Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi there, > > I am working on cleaning up the packaging of my project (GDCM) using > cmake so that the .deb produced is consistant with the debian package. > I was wondering if anyone had done the work before ? I am currently > struggl

Re: Packaging a project using cmake

On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2008-06-07, Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> I am working on cleaning up the packaging of my project (GDCM) using >> cmake so that the .deb produced is consistant with the debian package. >

A dream of the Debian-logo

This picture is a dream of the Debian-logo in the future... <>

Re: Packaging a project using cmake

On 2008-06-07, Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 2008-06-07, Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hi there, >>> >>> I am working on cleaning up the packaging of my project (GDCM) using >>> cmake

Re: Packaging a project using cmake

On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2008-06-07, Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On 2008-06-07, Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi there,

Re: Packaging a project using cmake

On 2008-06-07, Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> What do you mean ? Indeed I want the whole process from src to .deb >>> handled by cmake. >> >> Then please forget it. That doesn't make proper debs. > > because... Because they doesn't use - dpkg-shlibdeps - python-support|python-c

Re: Packaging a project using cmake

#include * Sune Vuorela [Sat, Jun 07 2008, 06:28:03PM]: > > SET(CPACK_DEBIAN_PACKAGE_DEPENDS "libc6, libstdc++6 (>= 4.0.2-4), > > libuuid1, zlib1g (>= 1:1.2.1), libgcc1 (>= 1:4.0.2), libexpat1, swig") > > you do this *manually* ? Relay, he cannot beat http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.

Re: A dream of the Debian-logo

On Saturday 07 June 2008 11:44:42 József Makay wrote: > This picture is a dream of the Debian-logo in the future... Very cool looking! -- Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> OpenPGP FP: 4135 2A3B 4726 ACC5 9094 0097 F0A9 8A4C 4CD6 E3D2 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Re: A dream of the Debian-logo

It's a very nice picture, but I guess maybe it would belong more to somewhere like DebianArt [1] than to this mailing list. Greetings, Miry [1] http://www.debianart.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: A dream of the Debian-logo

Hi, I do think so that its a really nice picture , but one of my suggestion is can't you create "e" in Circle/Spiral way. that is my personal opinion ,your work is extremely good. On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 12:39 AM, Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's a very nice picture, but I guess may

Re: Packaging a project using cmake

On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2008-06-07, Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What do you mean ? Indeed I want the whole process from src to .deb handled by cmake. >>> >>> Then please forget it. That doesn't make proper debs. >> >> b

Request for qsynth NMU

Hello, Debian developers, During the ubuntu package merging I have found that package qsynth is strongly outdated (0.2.5 from 2006-03-05 against 0.3.2 from 2007-12-1) and formed not so well (changes directly to the original source and numerous issues in debian/*). I already have repackaged it from

Re: Packaging a project using cmake

"Mathieu Malaterre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You need to use cmake 2.6.0 (none of the dpkg-* utils are needed in > the process). I believe the current thinking on this is that using the dpkg-* utilities is required for uploads to the Debian repositories. Even if you can duplicate their beha

Re: Packaging a project using cmake

"Mathieu Malaterre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> - running ldconfig in postinst > AFAIK that's not always required... Policy 8.1.1. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --

Re: Request for qsynth NMU

OoO En ce début de soirée du samedi 07 juin 2008, vers 21:19, "Sergey Rudchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > During the ubuntu package merging I have found that package qsynth is strongly > outdated (0.2.5 from 2006-03-05 against 0.3.2 from 2007-12-1) and formed not > so > well (changes dire

Bug#485037: ITP: tomcat-native -- Tomcat native library using apache portable runtime

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: tomcat-native Version : 1.1.13 Upstream Author : Apache Software Foundation * URL : http://tomcat.apache.org/ * License : Apache License 2.0 Programming Lang: C Descrip

Re: How to build only linux-image-2.6.18-6-686

On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 11:31:14AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 11:51:04AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > > Shouldn't that be easier to do, and - most of all - documented? > > Playing with source packages isn't normal. It used to be much worse > (2.6.8 in sarge involved bu

Re: Packaging a project using cmake

On 2008-06-07, Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: And this is where the cmake folks are wrong (I once wrote them a long email about it). >>> >>> link, please ? >> >> To Alex Neundorff and Bill Hoffmann. > > I originally wrote the deb plugin, Alex simply integrated in cmake. If >

Re: How to build only linux-image-2.6.18-6-686

On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 08:31:47PM +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > My problem with make-kpkg has always been that I could never rely on its > generated -headers packages to actually work. Odd, the headers it generated allways worked for me. > So it was fine to build a kernel. But if I wanted to bui

Re: How to build only linux-image-2.6.18-6-686

On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 05:23:19PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 08:31:47PM +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > My problem with make-kpkg has always been that I could never rely on its > > generated -headers packages to actually work. > > Odd, the headers it generated allway

Re: How to build only linux-image-2.6.18-6-686

On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 09:35:28PM +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > Taken to another system? I don't remember if I did or not. > The problems I remember: > > 1. the "source" and "build" links pointed to an incorrect place. An > invalid build link is a problem. Where do they point? > 2. If I actua

Re: How to build only linux-image-2.6.18-6-686

On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 14:53:03 +0200, Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Saturday 07 June 2008 11:51, Marc Haber wrote: >> Shouldn't that be easier to do, > >Send patches?! ;) Since I pay more attention to my personal and mental health, I tend to minimize my contact to the Debian Kernel "Te

Re: How to build only linux-image-2.6.18-6-686

On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 11:31:14 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) wrote: >On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 11:51:04AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: >> Shouldn't that be easier to do, and - most of all - documented? > >Playing with source packages isn't normal. >The package is designed to make the life of

Claim Award!!!!!!!!

__REMOVED__ === Benvenuto in Maxi Mail di Virgilio e Tin.it! [EMAIL PROTECTED] tramite il servizio Maxi Mail ha messo a tua disposizione i seguenti allegati : * loo.txt (0 byte) per prelevarli, fai click sul seguente link ch

Re: A dream of the Debian-logo

On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Deepak Tripathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > I do think so that its a really nice picture , but one of my suggestion is > can't you create "e" in Circle/Spiral way. > that is my personal opinion ,your work is extremely good. > > > On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 12:39

Mass bug filing: FTBFS because of using imake without Build-Depends on xutils-dev

From the changelog for xorg 1:7.3+11: * Remove the dependency of xutils against xutils-dev, it was only useful for transitional purpose in Etch, closes: #418123. This means that any package which used xmkmf/imake and had xutils, instead of xutils-dev, for the Build-Depends will now FTBFS.

Re: How to build only linux-image-2.6.18-6-686

On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 12:41:01AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > I find that attitute totally unacceptable. Well it looks that way to me. In fact I would say that is true of ever source package. The goal is to make the maintainers job easy, since they are the ones that deal with the source package.

Re: Mass bug filing: FTBFS because of using imake without Build-Depends on xutils-dev

On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 07:26:05PM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote: > From the changelog for xorg 1:7.3+11: > * Remove the dependency of xutils against xutils-dev, it was only useful > for transitional purpose in Etch, closes: #418123. > This means that any package which used xmkmf/imake and h