Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> If nvidia prebuilt modules are merged in linux-modules-nonfree-2.6, they'll
> be
> tied to kqemu prebuilt modules. This would hurt both nvidia LKM-s and kqemu
> LKM-s, which are already in bad enough shape.
you seem to have no idea how conglomeration packages work. ple
Good news for your lover and you! http://
Humphrey Bowman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2008-05-11 at 22:31 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 11382 March 1977, Neil Williams wrote:
>
> > Package: general
> > Severity: normal
> > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > In preparation for a pseudo-package, buildd.emdebian.org, I'm filing
>
> Yes, as flooding -devel with lots of useless stu
On Mon, 12 May 2008, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > Afaiui dehs *only* sends emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> > and the question was whether the pts only adds the header to e-mails
> > generated by its own scripts or also to stuff received by mail. (I
> > have no idea whether this even a correct dichot
On Mon, 12 May 2008, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-05-11 at 22:31 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > On 11382 March 1977, Neil Williams wrote:
> >
> > > Package: general
> > > Severity: normal
> > > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > In preparation for a pseudo-package, buildd.emdebian.org, I'm fili
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 03:34:40PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need some help packaging Tcl language bindings for ITK [1]. I've
> read the policy (in package tcl-doc) but I'm not sure whether
> I'm doing the right thing.
>
> I am essentially tcl illiterate, so please explain thing
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 01:44:24PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 12 May 2008, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > > Afaiui dehs *only* sends emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> > > and the question was whether the pts only adds the header to e-mails
> > > generated by its own scripts or also to stuff
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 13:47 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 12 May 2008, Neil Williams wrote:
> >
> > OK, I'm using quiet now so there should be no more CC'd reports to
> > -devel with the next batch of reports. Sorry for the noise.
>
> Why are you filing those against "general" and not t
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 13:47 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> As a maintainer, I would have no problem receiving such reports
> if they are filed with a severity minor. Then you use some usertags to get
> a global view of all the open issues distribution-wise.
>
> In fact, I think that it makes more
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 03:39:15PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Yes, the problems with conglomeration packages are the same as you'd get by
> merging 2 somewhat related source packages together, say iceweasel with
> icedove. Although the source packages would probably share a bit of code, if
Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> b. Every tool sending automated mail to Debian Developers should add
>headers of the form
>
> X-Debian: $TOOL
> X-Debian-Package: $PACKAGE
It's probably too late, but wouldn't have been better to use the
following instead?
X-Debian-Tool:
Package: general
Severity: wishlist
I'm creating this bug to track support for playing blu-ray discs in Debian's
default desktop install.
I'll add related bugs as blockers to this one (and welcome others to do the
same).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers stable
APT polic
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> block 480925 with 480910 480914
Bug#480910: missing UDF 2.50 support
Bug#480914: segfault when playing *.m2ts file
Bug#480925: support for playing blu-ray discs
Was not blocked by any
David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 11 May 2008 00:36:00 +0700, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
>
>> Twas brillig at 19:18:39 10.05.2008 UTC+02 when David Paleino did gyre and
>> gimble:
>>
>> DP> How should I behave here?
>>
>> I'd treat john-any and john-mmx as parts of program - merel
Your message dated Mon, 12 May 2008 22:27:03 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Mail headers for automated package maintenance emails
has caused the Debian Bug report #479953,
regarding uniform field for automated package maintenance email messages
to be marked as done.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Cager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libservlet2.5-java
Version : 2.5
Upstream Author : Various
* URL : http://tomcat.apache.org
* License : Apache 2
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Version 2.5 of th
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastien Delafond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libvalidatable-ruby
Version : 1.6.7
Upstream Author : Jay Fields
* URL : http://validatable.rubyforge.org/
* License : Ruby
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jelmer Vernooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: subunit
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jonathan Lange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Le May 12, 2008 09:39:25 am Lennart Sorensen, vous avez écrit :
> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 03:39:15PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > Yes, the problems with conglomeration packages are the same as you'd get
> > by merging 2 somewhat related source packages together, say iceweasel
> > with icedove
Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> If nvidia prebuilt modules are merged in linux-modules-nonfree-2.6, they'll be
> tied to kqemu prebuilt modules. This would hurt both nvidia LKM-s and kqemu
> LKM-s, which are already in bad enough shape.
you seem to have no idea how conglomeration packages work.
I
20 matches
Mail list logo
