Add me also, jus Ignore if already added
On 4/17/08, Life is full of choices. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ADD me For Exchange
>
--
Best Regards - Paarth
Columbiacityguide.net
(moving to -devel as -release is not meant to be a discussion
list Please note this is not directed at your post, which was
appropriate for -release but my comments are IMHO not. CC'ing you in
case you're not subscribed to -devel)
Quoting Laszlo Boszormenyi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Various peop
I've been using Google Talk and thought you might like to try it out.
We can use it to call each other for free over the internet. Here's an
invitation to download Google Talk. Give it a try!
---
Bijendra Webmaster wants to stay
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: soci
Version : 2.2.0
Upstream Author : Maciej Sobczak, Stephen Hutton, David Courtney,
Pawel Aleksander Fedorynski, Rafal Bobrowski, Mateusz Loskot
* URL : http
I've been using Google Talk and thought you might like to try it out.
We can use it to call each other for free over the internet. Here's an
invitation to download Google Talk. Give it a try!
---
anil webmaster wants to stay in b
Dear fellow debian developers.
Currently debian/testing ships a very old copy of ffmpeg, dated from
0.cvs20070307. We, the ffmpeg maintainers (Fabian Greffrath and myself)
do not consider that version of ffmpeg acceptable for release in debian
lenny. Many newer applications of ffmpeg (like mplaye
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: tempita
Version: 0.1
Upstream Author: Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL: http://pythonpaste.org/tempita/
License: MIT
Descripti
x-post, fup2 debian-devel if possible
Am Samstag, den 19.04.2008, 09:57 +0200 schrieb Andreas Barth:
> * Laszlo Boszormenyi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080419 07:42]:
> > I intend to hijack GnuPG[1], but as it builds an udeb and has priority
> > important, I ask if the Release Team allow it.
[..]
> And,
[moving to -devel to make Christian happy]
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 09:57:44AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> And, BTW, most of us (including me) have a paid dayjob, and are of
> course active on that one for the contracted time - for obvious reasons.
> Telling that I would neglect Debian because I'
On Saturday 19 April 2008 22:25:31 Clint Adams wrote:
> > And, BTW, most of us (including me) have a paid dayjob, and are of
> > course active on that one for the contracted time - for obvious
> > reasons. Telling that I would neglect Debian because I'm spending more
> > time on my dayjob than Debi
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 10:37:57PM +0530, Kartik Mistry wrote:
> gnupg is important package. PTS says:
> "The package is of priority standard or higher, you should really find some
> co-maintainers."
> Suggestion: Can we replace 'should' with 'must'?
Wrong problem - we don't need more maintaine
>From what I read sylpheed-claws has been superseeded by claws-mail. In
fact the description of the latter says:
Claws Mail is a powerful and full-featured mail client formerly called
Sylpheed-Claws.
So is there a need to keep the old one around? It is orphaned, has 32
open bugs and offers softwa
* Clint Adams ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080419 19:00]:
> [moving to -devel to make Christian happy]
>
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 09:57:44AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > And, BTW, most of us (including me) have a paid dayjob, and are of
> > course active on that one for the contracted time - for obvio
On Saturday 19 April 2008 14:46, Michael Meskes wrote:
> >From what I read sylpheed-claws has been superseeded by claws-mail. In
>
> fact the description of the latter says:
>
> Claws Mail is a powerful and full-featured mail client formerly called
> Sylpheed-Claws.
>
> So is there a need to keep t
* Daniel Leidert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080419 17:51]:
> x-post, fup2 debian-devel if possible
> Am Samstag, den 19.04.2008, 09:57 +0200 schrieb Andreas Barth:
> > * Laszlo Boszormenyi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080419 07:42]:
> > > I intend to hijack GnuPG[1], but as it builds an udeb and has priority
> >
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:20:39PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> I think new and separate boost-1.35 package is the best option we have:
>
> 1. It may be uploaded now and released with lenny without touching
> any reverse dependency
> 2. Never more huge transitions, reverse dependencies
Le samedi 19 avril 2008 à 07:06 +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi a écrit :
> I intend to hijack GnuPG[1]
It would be very nice to see GnuPG more actively maintained indeed.
If you prepare an upload of the latest upstream version, it would be
nice to synchronize with someone from the GNOME team so that s
Steve M. Robbins wrote:
If we do decide to have co-installable -dev packages, the next
question is how do we handle the current non-versioned includes and
link libraries? Do we follow what gcc and python do, providing a
defaults that change from time to time? Or should we not attempt to
provide
You have received this e-mail message from Promate Technologies News Centre,
Should you wish to remove your e-mail address from the mailing list please
reply this e-mail with Remove in the Subject.
Promate Technologieswww.promate.net
The newest fad in Mass bug closings is:
All bugs against package "nurd5" have been automatically closed without
further review,
as "nurd5" has been removed from Debian.
OK, fair enough, until one checks deeper and finds:
"nurd5" has been removed from Debian because:
On 2008-04-19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The newest fad in Mass bug closings is:
> All bugs against package "nurd5" have been automatically closed without
> further review,
> as "nurd5" has been removed from Debian.
>
> OK, fair enough, until one checks deeper and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The newest fad in Mass bug closings is:
All bugs against package "nurd5" have been automatically closed without
further review,
as "nurd5" has been removed from Debian.
OK, fair enough, until one checks deeper and finds:
"nurd5" has been removed
Barry deFreese wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> The newest fad in Mass bug closings is:
>> All bugs against package "nurd5" have been automatically closed without
>> further review, as "nurd5" has been removed from Debian.
>
> Where possible they are being reviewed. Of course it's possible tha
On Sunday 20 April 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> I assume that in _all_ [1] cases an attempt is made to contact the
> maintainers first?
>
> I also assume that this is only done after a package is also no longer in
> stable or, as long as it is supported, in oldstable?
Maybe in general it would be good
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bertrand Marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: fglrx-kernel-modules
Version : 1:8-4-1
Upstream Author : ATI/AMD
* URL : http://ati.amd.com/support/drivers/linux/linux-radeon.html
* License : restricted
Description
I happen to often send mails to @packages.debian.org while
conducting my NMU campaigns for l10n bugs hunting.
From time to time, I still get such mails rejected because the said
package uses a mailing list as "Maintainer:".
This is of course one of the keys of collaborative maintenance but,
pleas
26 matches
Mail list logo
