On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Besides of what Stephen Gran already said on his message I believe there's
> no chance of NMU's to take place if the bugs aren't reported :).
I would never NMU just to correct an harmless rpath. Thus if I NMU such a
package, it's because of something
Hi
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:20:18 -0600
Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seems like I forgot to make sure to list only those affecting packages in
> unstable. But it would anyway be nice to keep both watch files working :)
I know, but I tend to forgot to this when I upload package to
Florian Weimer:
* ARAKI Yasuhiro:
Do you like cdn.debian.net's idea and implementation?
Sorry if I sound like a broken record. What kind of software do you
use?
Is this just DNS-Balance plus a handful of scripts?
Patially right.
cdn.d.n is consisted by
-(modifiled) DNS-balance to return DN
Hi,
libprojectM upstream are soon releasing libprojectM 1.1 which makes the
following breakage:
public: PCM *projectM::pcm
is replaced by:
public: const inline PCM *projectM::pcm() { return _pcm; }
So, is this the proper solution:
* libprojectm1 -> libprojectm2
* libprojectm-dev -> libproject
Hi
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 03:43:09 -0600
William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> libprojectM upstream are soon releasing libprojectM 1.1 which makes the
> following breakage:
>
> public: PCM *projectM::pcm
>
> is replaced by:
>
> public: const inline PCM *projectM::pcm() { return _pcm; }
>
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 03:43:09AM -0600, William Pitcock wrote:
> libprojectM upstream are soon releasing libprojectM 1.1 which makes the
> following breakage:
>
> public: PCM *projectM::pcm
>
> is replaced by:
>
> public: const inline PCM *projectM::pcm() { return _pcm; }
>
> So, is this the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Pkg-e Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ecore
Version : 0.9.9.042
Upstream Author : Carsten Haitzler and the e17 devel team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.enlightenment.org
* License : BSD
Programm
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Alexander V. Inyukhin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: task-spooler
Version : 0.5.3
Upstream Author : Lluц╜s Batlle i Rossel [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://vicerveza.homeunix.net/~viric/soft/ts/
* License : GPL
P
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: eeepc-acpi-scripts
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Debian EeePC Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://alioth.debian.org/projects/debian-eeepc/
* License : GPL
Programming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Hanke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-mvpa
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Michael Hanke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pkg-exppsy.alioth.debian
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:14:16 +0100 Yves-Alexis Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On mar, 2008-02-19 at 02:20 +0800, Thomas GOIRAND wrote:
>> As Yahoo! requests DomainKeys to be implemented for sending mail to
>> them, it's quite urgent that this package reaches SID asap to allow
>> people to be ab
Yasuhiro Araki dijo [Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 07:53:21AM +0900]:
> Example of configuration lines are followings for unam.mx.
>
> $addr_db = {
> "133.248.0.0/16" => { # => Request from 133.248.0.0/16
>#For example, DNS client's IP is
>
* William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080219 10:40]:
> libprojectM upstream are soon releasing libprojectM 1.1 which makes the
> following breakage:
>
> public: PCM *projectM::pcm
>
> is replaced by:
>
> public: const inline PCM *projectM::pcm() { return _pcm; }
>
> So, is this the proper solu
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrew Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: lxpanel
Version : 0.2.5
Upstream Author : Hong Jen Yee(PCMan) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.gnomefiles.org/app.php/LXPanel
* License : (GPL, LGPL)
Programming Lang:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Iustin Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ganeti-instance-debian-etch
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Google Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/ganeti
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Shell
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> Besides of what Stephen Gran already said on his message I believe
>> there's no chance of NMU's to take place if the bugs aren't reported :).
>
> I would never NMU just to correct an harmless rpath. Thus if I NMU such a
> p
Someone reported a bug against lockfile-progs, and while investigating
I noticed a couple of things about liblockfile that didn't seem quite
right.
First of all, if you run "lockfile-create foo", which calls
lockfile_create() without the L_PID flag, you'll see that the
resulting foo.lock file con
17 matches
Mail list logo
