Le lundi 14 janvier 2008 à 21:25 +, Peter Clifton a écrit :
> Since there are no other categories in the XDG spec which fit, this is
> really why the problem occurs:
>
> "Every conforming desktop environment MUST support" (XDG menu-spec)
At least for GNOME, I have nothing against adding new m
Le dimanche 13 janvier 2008 à 22:02 +0100, Loïc Minier a écrit :
> >On a technical level, the best approach would appear to be
> > implementing some sort of global dpkg postinst and postrm hooks.
>
> Yes, "triggers"; I think these were not available at the time of the
> first impleme
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 09:34:54AM +, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 01:10:26AM +, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > Don't start filing remove requests until other maintainers have a
> > chance. Take the step of contacting those who maintain packages that
> > depend on the l
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 01:10:26AM +, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Don't start filing remove requests until other maintainers have a
> chance. Take the step of contacting those who maintain packages that
> depend on the libraries you want to remove, post RFAs instead of remove
> requests, and
Hi, tried to install this:
debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso
from 2008-13-01.
It hangs during download of files. I tried twice, first time stopped after
approx 600, second after 841 of 923, that's 30-45 mins into a 1 hour
download.
Only thing I can see is that there is no activity on the network.
Deng Xiyue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ...so I can be safely removed when it has 0 rdepends.
And of course, s/I/it/ . Sorry for the stupid typo :P
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Deng Xiyue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> can do to help, so I can be safely removed when it has 0 rdepends.
And of course, s/I/it . Sorry for this stupid typo :P
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As confirmed by QA team that Chris Leishman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, the
maintainer of libxml++{,2.6} is kind of MIA, I would like to help
comaintaining these libs. I've already file a wishlist bug for
libxml++2.6 (#430142[1]), which contains a preliminary version of
.diff.gz and .dsc against latest u
Hello,
When I install a program in Windows, it's need to set
one directory.
I would like make the same with packages debian.
How I can do it ?
Best regards,
Faria
Abra sua conta no Yahoo! Mail, o único sem limite de espaço para
armazenamento!
http://br.mail.yahoo.com/
--
T
Hi Faria,
this is a "development" list, not a user support list. You have higher
chances of getting responses when you ask one of the local user groups
or mailing lists.
On Di, 15 Jan 2008, Rodrigo Tavares wrote:
> When I install a program in Windows, it's need to set
> one directory.
>
>
> I
"cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "As long as there's interest the software will stay alive" is one of the
> main tenets of Free Software. Consequently, IMHO, as long as there's people
> willing to maintain it, it shouldn't be removed regardless of how old it
> is.
GNO
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 11:34:10PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> Can submenus be made to appear automatically? I should study the
> standards.
Err, like you did already for games, as you said. I see in the
standard GNOME gnome-applications.menu.
It appears that the Technical menu should include
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:39:03AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 14 janvier 2008 à 21:25 +, Peter Clifton a écrit :
> > Since there are no other categories in the XDG spec which fit, this is
> > really why the problem occurs:
> >
> > "Every conforming desktop environment MUST suppo
On Tuesday 15 January 2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 01:10:26AM +, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > Don't start filing remove requests until other maintainers have a
> > chance. Take the step of contacting those who maintain packages that
> > depend on the libraries you w
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Err, like you did already for games, as you said. I see in the
standard GNOME gnome-applications.menu.
It appears that the Technical menu should include at least;
- Science
- Engineering
- Math
- HamRadio
- Electronics
And here we have good chances f
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul van Tilburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: mcrl2
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Jan Friso Groote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and many others
* URL : http://www.mcrl2.org/
* License : Boost Software License (MIT-like),
Hello,
When I install a program in Windows, it's need to set
one directory.
I would like make the same with packages debian.
How I can do it ?
Is there any tool for this work ?
Best regards,
Faria
Abra sua conta no Yahoo! Mail, o único sem limite de espaço para
armazenamento!
htt
When I right-click an installed package in Synaptic, I don't see
'Configure' option, which runs dpkg-reconfigure .
Since Synaptic's page tells: 'Debian only: Configure packages through
the debconf system.': allowing this option & setting Debconf priority
from Synaptic needs a patch?
Unfort
On Tuesday 15 January 2008, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> "cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "As long as there's interest the software will stay alive" is one of
> > the main tenets of Free Software. Consequently, IMHO, as long as
> > there's people willing to maintain i
-- rm
i noticed this bug [1] is the only wnpp bug using
the type "rm" for removal. is this an official
type that scripts talking to BTS should support?
is it documented somewhere? is it a bug in the bug
report?
-- ita
i noticed the "intent to adopt" tag is not mentioned
on [2] though used frequen
El mar, 15-01-2008 a las 14:22 +0100, Andreas Tille escribió:
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> > Err, like you did already for games, as you said. I see in the
> > standard GNOME gnome-applications.menu.
> >
> > It appears that the Technical menu should include at least;
> > - Scie
Hi Sebastian,
* Sebastian Pipping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-15 15:58]:
> -- rm
> i noticed this bug [1] is the only wnpp bug using
> the type "rm" for removal. is this an official
> type that scripts talking to BTS should support?
> is it documented somewhere? is it a bug in the bug
> report?
I
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, José L. Redrejo Rodríguez wrote:
And here we have good chances for a flame because I as a user would
not expect Science and Math under a main menu "Technical". I'd rather
see "Science" as a main menu entry and find "Math" below this. I
do not say that my point of view is c
El mar, 15-01-2008 a las 16:22 +0100, Andreas Tille escribió:
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, José L. Redrejo Rodríguez wrote:
>
> >> And here we have good chances for a flame because I as a user would
> >> not expect Science and Math under a main menu "Technical". I'd rather
> >> see "Science" as a main
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 10:34 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 01:10:26AM +, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > Don't start filing remove requests until other maintainers have a
> > chance. Take the step of contacting those who maintain packages that
> > depend on the librari
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 04:35:54PM +, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 10:34 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 01:10:26AM +, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > > Don't start filing remove requests until other maintainers have a
> > > chance. Take th
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 11:35:54AM -0500, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> So please, let these maintainers choose, rather than ordering them
> about. It is *they* who are in a position to decide whether maintaining
> gnome 1.x is worth it. Of course, it will also be up to them to do the
> maintenanc
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 15:56 +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> -- rm
> i noticed this bug [1] is the only wnpp bug using
> the type "rm" for removal. is this an official
> type that scripts talking to BTS should support?
> is it documented somewhere? is it a bug in the bug
> report?
>
> -- ita
> i
reassign 453466 ftp.debian.org
thanks
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 03:56:35PM +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> -- rm
> i noticed this bug [1] is the only wnpp bug using
> the type "rm" for removal. is this an official
> type that scripts talking to BTS should support?
> is it documented somewhere? is
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 17:56 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > So please, let these maintainers choose, rather than ordering them
> > about. It is *they* who are in a position to decide whether maintaining
> > gnome 1.x is worth it. Of course, it will also be up to them to do the
> > maintenance.
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 13:39 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> "cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "As long as there's interest the software will stay alive" is one of the
> > main tenets of Free Software. Consequently, IMHO, as long as there's people
> > willing to
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 17:02 +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 11:35:54AM -0500, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > So please, let these maintainers choose, rather than ordering them
> > about. It is *they* who are in a position to decide whether maintaining
> > gnome 1.x is worth
Nico Golde wrote:
i noticed the "intent to adopt" tag is not mentioned
on [2] though used frequently. is this on purpose?
I guess yes since this part is about adding a new wnpp bug.
And adding a bug with ITA as tag does not make much sense.
It is documented on http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 13:39 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
>> "cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> "As long as there's interest the software will stay alive" is one of the
>>> main tenets of Free Software. Consequently, IMHO, as long as th
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jelmer Vernooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: line6usb-source
Version : 0.7.2
Upstream Author : Markus Grabner
* URL : http://www.tanzband-scream.at/line6/
* License : G
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I wouldn't. I don't keep tabs on every package that my packages depend
> on. One of them could be orphaned and I would never know.
Running wnpp-alert weekly out of cron is a good idea for any DD, IMO.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Instead of saying "we're deleting this, you will all have to adapt",
> say, "we aren't maintaining this anymore; if you want it, you'll
> have to start taking it over."
Isn't that exactly what bug #369130 means? I thought it was the
responsibility
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 02:22:19PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
>> Err, like you did already for games, as you said. I see in the
>> standard GNOME gnome-applications.menu.
>>
>> It appears that the Technical menu should include at least;
>> - Science
>
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 19:56 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> We can surely keep all old cruft in the archive and never release again
> (or not with these packages anyway), though I don't think that is
> preferred from a quality assurance, security nor release point of view...
Of course, this isn't what
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 02:22:19PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
>> Err, like you did already for games, as you said. I see in the
>> standard GNOME gnome-applications.menu.
>>
>> It appears that the Technical menu should include at least;
>> - Science
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: kpar2
Version: 0.3.1
Upstream Author: Lawrence Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL: http://kde-apps.org/content/show.php/KPar2?content=70101
License: GPL
Description: a frontend for verifying and repairing PAR and P
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> As per release goal, gnome 1.x won't be shipped in Lenny. I just started
> a first round of bugs (severity important for now), with user/usertag
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]/gnome-1.x-removal so that people
> interested in that goal can track our progress.
Two thumbs up, thanks for
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:53:50PM +, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > As per release goal, gnome 1.x won't be shipped in Lenny. I just started
> > a first round of bugs (severity important for now), with user/usertag
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]/gnome-1.x-removal so that people
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:39:03AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > I think the good solution is a new "technical" menu with optional
> > submenus appearing when it becomes too large. If you can agree on the
> > structure of this menu and make it fit as much as possible to existing
> > XDG cate
44 matches
Mail list logo
