On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 05:42:43PM +, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am Di den 27. Nov 2007 um 16:13 schrieb Pierre Habouzit:
> > (1) xinetd reads and honours /etc/inetd.conf ;
>
> As long as this is default switched of this might be ok.
No it's on by default, and easy to change in /et
= sh44.com =
Ùتاب جدÙد ÙÙ Ù
ا شاÙ٠رج٠Ùا٠Ù
Ù
Ù٠اخذ Ù
ÙÙ Ùسخ٠ÙزÙجتÙ
http://sh44.com/vb/showthread.php?t=167
===
...
FOOTER ===
http://www.sh44.com/vb
Unsubscription :
http://alwwn.com/subscription.php?li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Pierre,
Am Mi den 28. Nov 2007 um 9:45 schrieb Pierre Habouzit:
> > As long as this is default switched of this might be ok.
>
> No it's on by default, and easy to change in /etc/default/xinetd.
So it is easy switchable. (May there are a debco
* Uwe Steinmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071127 14:02]:
> I need some help with #94 since I'm neither an ocaml nor a
> hppa, sparc specialist. The package orpie ships with its own
> gsl ocaml bindings and they cannot be compiled on hppa and sparc
> due to an alignment problem. I contacted upstream
It looks like thttpd works okay with php[45]-cgi, provided that all of the
.php files have the appropriate #!/usr/bin/php[45]-cgi set
On Nov 27, 2007 10:57 AM, Leo costela Antunes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> > Well, I wondered, whenever an application needs a http-demon
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 09:15:05AM +, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Hi Pierre,
>
> Am Mi den 28. Nov 2007 um 9:45 schrieb Pierre Habouzit:
> > > As long as this is default switched of this might be ok.
> >
> > No it's on by default, and easy to change in /etc/default/xinetd.
>
> So it is easy swi
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> If I'm not mistaken, there is no standard way of getting the value of just a
> single arbitrary substitution variable, such as ${source:Upstream-Version}.
> Consequently, countless of debian/rules and other scripts reinvent the wheel
> using dpkg-parsechangelog together
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 11:51:07AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Well, not completely true. There might be more than one understanding.
> > Mine is that providing a inet-superserver provides the _functionality_
> > of a inet-superserver not the same _config file_.
> wrong. providing inet-sup
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 11:08:27AM +, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 11:51:07AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > > Well, not completely true. There might be more than one understanding.
> > > Mine is that providing a inet-superserver provides the _functionality_
> > > of a ine
Pierre Habouzit schrieb:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 09:15:05AM +, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
>
>>> Since xinetd conflicts with inet-superserver it's the sole one that
>>> can honour /etc/inetd.conf.
>> Well, not completely true. There might be more than one understanding.
>> Mine is that providing a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: timelimit
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://devel.ringlet.net/sysutils/timelimit/
* License : Two-clause BSD
Programming
> However I don't think there is anything copyrightable in these files;
> they only contain series of numbers that describe the mappings. Do you
> people think it could be suitable for main?
> (Please follow-up on -legal only for licensing discussions.)
>
> Ondrej, are you willing - if the legal p
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 07:57:44PM +0100, Leo costela Antunes wrote:
>> THTTPD doesn't (AFAIK) support PHP
>
> Does THTTPD not support CGI or FastCGI?
>
Oops, you're right.
But would the apps run "out of the box" with php-cgi? If so, then yes,
these bugs could be filed in
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: gpe-login
Version: 0.90
Upstream Author: Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL: http://gpe.linuxtogo.org/download/source/
License:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: gpe-ownerinfo
Version: 0.28
Upstream Author: Colin Marquardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Florian Boor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL: http:
Hi lists,
1- by default on our Debian system after a successful login through a
tty we are presented with the number of failures (unsuccesful logins)
that took place before using the same login name.For a non root user
this number is correct.
But what about the root user ? That number is "c
On 28-Nov-07, 05:25 (CST), Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit schrieb:
> > wrong. providing inet-superserver means that you are able to perform
> > what any implementation of inetd(8) does, namely, reading
> > /etc/inetd.conf, and _then_ possibly have extended features on
On Nov 28, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 11:51:07AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > wrong. providing inet-superserver means that you are able to perform
> > what any implementation of inetd(8) does, namely, reading
> > /etc/inetd.conf, and _then_ possibly
Steve Greenland schrieb:
> On 28-Nov-07, 05:25 (CST), Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Pierre Habouzit schrieb:
>>> wrong. providing inet-superserver means that you are able to perform
>>> what any implementation of inetd(8) does, namely, reading
>>> /etc/inetd.conf, and _then_ possib
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Am Mi den 28. Nov 2007 um 11:51 schrieb Pierre Habouzit:
> > (May there are a debconf question?)
>
> No I won't use debconf here, because it's definitely the most viable
> way to use xinetd nowadays. Though the next upload will document that
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everybody,
Yesterday, after fixing some bugs on DEHS (I'm now part of the team), I ran
the script that performs all the checks.
That means there's new, fresh, information regarding the watch files so I'd
like to report the new watch files failing t
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 07:01:13PM +, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Steve Greenland schrieb:
> > On 28-Nov-07, 05:25 (CST), Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Pierre Habouzit schrieb:
> >>> wrong. providing inet-superserver means that you are able to perform
> >>> what any implementation
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 07:06:13PM +, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Am Mi den 28. Nov 2007 um 11:51 schrieb Pierre Habouzit:
> Pardon? debconf overkill? This is right the correct place for it as it
> change the basic way the package work completely.
Debconf can be used if there isn't a sane default
Package: general
Severity: important
apt-get or aptitude stop work when i uninstall a linux image and
/boot/grub/menu.lst was deleted.
Installer should create automatically a new menu.lst file, but when it's time
to do it, process stop.
watch the console output:
BEGIN
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.10
> severity 453334 normal
Bug#453334: general: apt and aptitude stop work
Severity set to `normal' from `important'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 10:38:51PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> So what? Space is cheap these days.
Contrary to popular belief, space will never become free.
--
Home is where you have to wash the dishes.
-- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Whom It May Concern,
This is Dan Gargano - Owner/CEO of www.ticketmuncher.com. I just wanted to give
you, promoters, and event planners a heads up that we are now offering a free
consulting service to help you sell tickets to your events.
Basically, as a company with over 3,000 clients (all
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 08:06:13PM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Am Mi den 28. Nov 2007 um 11:51 schrieb Pierre Habouzit:
> > > (May there are a debconf question?)
> > No I won't use debconf here, because it's definitely the most viable
> > way to use xinetd nowadays. Though the next upload will
On Nov 24, 2007 11:05 PM, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 05:52:31PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> > azureus has a RC bug filed against it, #449176. Why did it migrate to
> > testing?
>
> Because there's no version information on bug #449176, so britney concludes
"Shaun Jackman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Nov 24, 2007 11:05 PM, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Because there's no version information on bug #449176, so britney
> > concludes that both the old and new versions of the package are
> > equally buggy.
>
> That does not seem lik
On Nov 29, 2007 9:48 AM, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That does not seem like a very safe default behaviour. When a new RC
> > bug has been submitted, it's a rather likely situation that the bug is
> > present in unstable and wasn't present before.
>
> I don't see how you get the "and
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 04:49:31PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> That does not seem like a very safe default behaviour. When a new RC
> bug has been submitted, it's a rather likely situation that the bug is
> present in unstable and wasn't present before.
That's why you use reportbug, so the versi
[Please preserve attribution lines on quoted material, so we can see
who said what in your message.]
"Paul Wise" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Nov 29, 2007 9:48 AM, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > That does not seem like a very safe default behaviour. When a
> > > new RC bug has
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:34:47PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> [0] the reasoning is: this is clear to me that through update-inetd
> that is the debian way to enable inet-like services, something
> that claims to be an inet-superserver must react on update-inetd
> triggered
On Nov 29, 2007 10:11 AM, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I don't see how you get the "and wasn't present before" part of
> > > that. Surely this is exactly what version tagging is for?
> >
> > Only way would be to map dates to versions.
>
> Not the "only way"; the BTS already has the
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 04:49:31PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> On Nov 24, 2007 11:05 PM, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 05:52:31PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> > > azureus has a RC bug filed against it, #449176. Why did it migrate to
> > > testing?
> > Bec
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Paul Wise wrote:
> In the absence of version tags, the only way to infer the "and
> wasn't present before" part would be to map timestamps (of bugs and
> uploads) to versions (of bugs and uploads).
Though the BTS actually has that information available (and uses it to
handle a
The Calls for Paper for the So Cal Linux Expo, and its Friday special
sessions, Women in Open Source, Demonstrating Open Source Software
Health Care Solutions, and Open Source Software in Education, close
Friday 11/30.
If you're contemplating submitting a paper for any of these session,
don't
It has been months since pfmon 3.2.070507-1 was uploaded. What
happened to its build? Why is it not built on i386 yet?
--
Seo Sanghyeon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting Raphael Geissert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> This time the number of watch files to be reported is 88, reason why I'm
> posting to the list.
> I hope there won't be any objection and that nobody disagrees on me making
> an other, probably mass (depends on the watch files, not me :), bug filling
40 matches
Mail list logo
