Re: Friendly reminder: the Vcs-Browser field is now official

2007-10-30 Thread Willi Mann
> The packages listed below use the 'XS-Vcs-Browse' field, which has > been obsoleted by the new, official 'Vcs-Browser' field. Please > consider upgrading your control files to use that. Also note that > the proper capitalization is 'Vcs-Browser', not 'VCS-Browser'. > Thanks. Why did you not s

Bug#448586: "No such file or directory" misleading

2007-10-30 Thread Benjamin Gufler
Hi, On 2007-10-30 09:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > This message made by several programs is misleading: > # ed /etc/fonts/conf.d/61-traditional.conf > /etc/fonts/conf.d/61-traditional.conf: No such file or directory I don't agree. > # ls /etc/fonts/conf.d/61-traditional.conf > ls: /etc/fonts/co

Bug#448586: marked as done ("No such file or directory" misleading)

2007-10-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:07:18 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#448586: "No such file or directory" misleading has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#448586: "No such file or directory" misleading

2007-10-30 Thread jidanni
Package: general Severity: wishlist This message made by several programs is misleading: # ed /etc/fonts/conf.d/61-traditional.conf /etc/fonts/conf.d/61-traditional.conf: No such file or directory q # ls /etc/fonts/conf.d/61-traditional.conf ls: /etc/fonts/conf.d/61-traditional.conf: No such file

Processed: ed messages worrisome

2007-10-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 448586 Bug#448586: "No such file or directory" misleading Bug reopened, originator not changed. > reassign 448586 ed Bug#448586: "No such file or directory" misleading Bug reassigned from package `general' to `ed'. > thanks Stopping processing

Bug#448586: "No such file or directory" misleading

2007-10-30 Thread jidanni
I guess what bothers me is >> # ed /etc/fonts/conf.d/61-traditional.conf >> /etc/fonts/conf.d/61-traditional.conf: No such file or directory makes me need to check "do I need to create the directory?" instead of just proceeding to edit the file. $ vi /zzz/qqq is worse. It only checks when it's tim

Bug#448594: ITP: rabbit -- presentation tool using RD, a simple text format

2007-10-30 Thread Kobayashi Noritada
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Kobayashi Noritada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: rabbit Version : 0.5.3 Upstream Author : Kouhei Sutou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.cozmixng.org/~rwiki/?cmd=view;name=Rabbit * License : Ruby's Programming

Bug#140230: Unsuccessful fax transmission to 14023424164. Re: october 77% off

2007-10-30 Thread send2
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED], Re: october 77% off The fax you recently sent through j2 to 14023424164 did not go through because your email address is not registered for this service. If your service does include the ability to send faxes, please log in at https://www.j2.com/jconnect/twa/login

Re: Bug#448586: "No such file or directory" misleading

2007-10-30 Thread Vincent Zweije
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 05:17:42PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: || I guess what bothers me is || >> # ed /etc/fonts/conf.d/61-traditional.conf || >> /etc/fonts/conf.d/61-traditional.conf: No such file or directory || makes me need to check "do I need to create the directory?" instead of ||

XS-Vcs-*, XS-X-Vcs-* and friends

2007-10-30 Thread Romain Francoise
Willi Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Why did you not search for XS-Vcs in general? Because packages using XS-Vcs-Browse are easy to catch, you can just look at the Sources file and filter on 'Vcs-Browse'. Since the other XS-Vcs-* fields get normalized to legit values, catching them requires