On 9/29/07, Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, if you're root you probably can. Something like this (completely
> untested; probably doesn't even compile):
Yes, it works, and AFAIK it has always done. A shorter program to test it:
#include
#include
#include
#include
int
ma
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 09:18:12PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 23:04:00 +0200, Martin Uecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > There is some other thing I do not like about the way Debian packages
> > work. Every package I install can actually completely compromise my
> > s
Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Roger Leigh wrote:
>> You can't reliably (or portably) check if you are in a chroot.
> Hmm, if you're root you probably can. Something like this (completely
> untested; probably doesn't even compile):
I agree that this method would work. But, can
Sam Leon wrote:
> My only complaint is that alot of website traffic analyzer programs pick
> up the debian iceweasel browser as "unknown browser" and "unknown
> operating system"
If they'd do their job right they'd look for the gecko engine and it's
version and not on the name of the browser.
Co
FAILURE NOTICE
Your request received at September 29, 12:29:48 PM GMT
from e-mail address [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to be faxed to 15035986653
with a subject of
could not be delivered.
Reason for failure: Not a registered user
The originating address of your e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
is
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Vincent Fourmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libhiglayout-java
Version : 1.0a
Upstream Author : Daniel Michalik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.autel.cz/dmi/tutorial.html
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: xavante
Version: 1.3.1
Upstream Author: Javier Guerra, André Carregal, and Fábio Mascarenhas
URL: http://keplerproject.org/xavante/
L
[Roger Leigh]
> But, can you detect it if you are already /inside/ the chroot?
> i.e. chroot(2) has been called at some point previously.
Yes. It's a consequence of two well-known properties of the chroot
call: (1) you can call chroot() even if you are already in a chroot, to
chroot yourself fur
[Piotr Roszatycki]
> 2007/9/26, Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > will that cause dfsg problems?
>
> Not at all. The packages was built with pbuilder. It still is not
> fully understandable, so I'll try explain:
I just downloaded the source package for libdatetime-timezone-perl, and
I
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:26:23PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Attached is a patch to dpkg which implements a check for a 'build-arch'
> target using 'make -f debian/rules -qn build-arch'.
Is there actually a defined semantic for make -qn ? The make info manual
states:
"It is an error to use m
On Sep 28, Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1) Ship a built copy of the code in the package's .diff.gz, and DTRT
> > at package creation time to move the .bin from debian/ to the right
> > place in the staging tree. The source code for the .bin is in
> > .orig.tar.gz, under a free licens
Hi,
> In this case the firmware image distributed as a blob in the source
> package can be built using the gcc-4.3-source package to create a
> crosscompiler (there is no requirement to have a single-step procedure).
What about the following plan:
- the first version of the package will build-de
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 12:25:51AM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> What about the following plan:
>
> - the first version of the package will build-dep. on the gcc source,
> build the compiler and build the firmware.
> - all new versions of the package will build-depend on the old package
> and just
Le Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 03:16:53PM +0100, Jon Dowland a écrit :
>
> I personally agree. I don't bother munging my email address
> at all anymore, as I don't think it helps a great deal in
> the mid to long term, and it certainly detracts from the
> usefulness of an address. However if an upstream
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ... it was already clear that Ben's requests [for valid contact
> information of copyright holders] are pointless.
On the contrary, the request has a clearly- and often-stated point: to
reduce the risk accepted by the Debian project that a copyright
On Sep 30, Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - the first version of the package will build-dep. on the gcc source,
> build the compiler and build the firmware.
> - all new versions of the package will build-depend on the old package
> and just copy the binary blob from it.
>
> Any object
16 matches
Mail list logo
