Le vendredi 28 septembre 2007 à 13:17 +1000, Paul Wise a écrit :
> On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 23:26 -0300, Carlos Laviola wrote:
>
> > * Needs no additional packages - embedded versions of vamps and
> > dvdauthor are used, to be as fast as possible.
>
> Please notify the Debian security team so
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Mehnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: mail-spf-perl
Version : 2.005
Upstream Author : Julian Mehnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mail-SPF/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Perl
Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I think we need a change in policy for handling cases where free
>> software requires free software in order to compile which is, non the
>> less, non buildable on the same platform.
>
> It exists already, it's called the cont
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Olivier Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi.
I intent to propose a generic Debian package for the following software.
We've made a local package already, on an old version of the program, which
suited our needs for the PicoForge platform (some details at
http
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Mehnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: net-dns-resolver-programmable-perl
Version : 0.003.1
Upstream Author : Julian Mehnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable/
* Licen
Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Julien BLACHE wrote:
>> Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I think we need a change in policy for handling cases where free
>>> software requires free software in order to compile which is, non the
>>> less, non buildable on the same pla
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ben Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: emusic-remote
Version : 1.0.0.1
Upstream Author : emusic.com
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/emusicremote/
* License : LGPL
David Anderson writes ("Packaging a library that requires cross-compiled code"):
> 2) Package an arm7 cross-compiling gcc with just the right set of
> options, integrate that with the packaging tools, and then package
> with a Build-Depends on the cross-compiler.
>
> Pro: feels like the Right Way,
Ben Finney writes ("Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file"):
> I argue that the only fair place to draw the line is "valid RFC 2821
> email address". The alternative is to leave it to ongoing subjective
> judgement of unspecified Debian parties as to which addresses make
> sense or no
On 9/27/07, Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think this is the way to go unless you get some concrete objections.
> There is certainly precedent - see for instance the ia32-libs /
> amd64-libs packages (which are frowned upon for whole different
> reasons).
[replying here, but this
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: miniupnpc
Version : 1.0-RC9
Upstream Author : Thomas Bernard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://miniupnp.free.fr/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C, C++
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: minissdpd
Version : 1.0-RC9
Upstream Author : Thomas Bernard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://miniupnp.free.fr/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C, C++
Description
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 06:31:58PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:28:47 +0200, Martin Uecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
[...]
> >> But recompiling from what? If you do not get the exact same source,
> >> you have no hope of getting the same result.
>
> > I had the impre
My only complaint is that alot of website traffic analyzer programs pick
up the debian iceweasel browser as "unknown browser" and "unknown
operating system"
Sam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xin chao! Toi muon Dat ve may Bay di ve Viet Nam vao khoang 30thang 12 nam 2007
va tro lai Nhat vao khoang 12 thang 1 nam 2008 thi phai Dat mua o dau ! thu tuc
nhu the nao , lien he voi ai ! va gia ve Khu hoi trong thoi diem do la nhu the
nao ! Rat mong duoc su Huong van va giup do!! Hien Toi da
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Mike O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-contract
Version : 1.4-1
Upstreem Author : Terence Way <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.wayforward.net/pycontract/
* License : Python License, GPL-3, Artist
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sergei Golovan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: tklib
Version : 0.4.1
Upstream Author : Various people (every module has its own author(s))
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/tcllib/
* License : BSD
Programming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: miniupnpd
Version : 1.0-RC9
Upstream Author : Thomas Bernard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C, C++
Description
Sorry i cant add ur link, i need atleast PR-3 link pages:
My link info are here - if any one interested please let me know:
Dear Webmaster,
I'm a webmaster of following travel related websites:
http://www.apartotels.com/
http://www.discountcityhotels.net/
http://www.discountcityhotels.com
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Martin Uecker wrote:
> You are seriously stating that is as easy to hide a trojan in the
> source code as in the binary?
Consider the fact that we've already had such a case,[1] whereas we've
not (to my knowledge) distributed a trojaned binary. I'm not sure
which is easier to
On 2007-09-27 16:39 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I don't think there is any requirement to have any upstream contact
> > information whatsoever in order to be able to distribute a package.
>
> This seems to be the point of disagreement. I think this
On 9/28/07, Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Pro: feels like the Right Way, in a perfect world. Cons: opens the
> > floodgates of packaging cross-compilers, likely requires
> > additions/modifications to packaging tools, and takes way more time
> > than I'm personally ready to put into pa
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 10:13:39PM +0200, Andre Majorel wrote:
> On 2007-09-27 16:39 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I don't think there is any requirement to have any upstream contact
> > > information whatsoever in order to be able to distribute a pa
Hi,
David Anderson wrote:
But, if there is precedent, it might not be too painful to mimick
existing cross-compiler packages to build my own. I'll see what I can
do.
Please coordinate any such effort with [EMAIL PROTECTED] :-)
I'm working on infrastructure to aid generation of cross-compiler
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 09:05:59AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Martin Uecker wrote:
> > You are seriously stating that is as easy to hide a trojan in the
> > source code as in the binary?
>
> Consider the fact that we've already had such a case,[1] whereas we've
> not (to my
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 11:04:00PM +0200, Martin Uecker wrote:
>
> There is some other thing I do not like about the way Debian
> packages work. Every package I install can actually completely
> compromise my system, because the maintainer scripts are run
> as root. It would be nice if normal pack
Someone wrote:
> If you actually need to make this sort of response, could you do the
> rest of us a favor and not do so publicly?
Ya, you're right. Sorry.
My frustration got the better of me.
- Bruce
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
Sam Leon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My only complaint is that alot of website traffic analyzer programs
> pick up the debian iceweasel browser as "unknown browser" and
> "unknown operating system"
That's a bug in those web sites, of course. They shouldn't even be
trying to sniff User-Agent to
Andre Majorel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 2007-09-27 16:39 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> > I think [valid contact information for copyright holders at the
> > time of packaging] should be required, in order that Debian users
> > can have more confidence [0] in the copyright status of works in
>
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ben Finney is not a Debian Developer. The views expressed by Ben
> Finney on this mailing list are not representative of the views of
> the Debian Project or any of its members.
With the caveat "not *necessarily* representative", we agree on that.
--
Le vendredi 28 septembre 2007 à 13:49 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> "You" don't distribute the package?
>
> Ben Finney is not a Debian Developer. The views expressed by Ben Finney on
> this mailing list are not representative of the views of the Debian Project
> or any of its members.
Oh, co
Hi,
> I'm working on infrastructure to aid generation of cross-compiler
> packages (a templating mechanism that generates the necessary Package
> stanzas in debian/control from another file that uses a descriptive
> language; "debian-xcontrol" would be the package you are looking for,
> however th
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 12:40:39AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 28 septembre 2007 à 13:49 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > "You" don't distribute the package?
> > Ben Finney is not a Debian Developer. The views expressed by Ben Finney on
> > this mailing list are not representa
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-pynxt
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : David Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : https://ssl.natulte.net/nxos/devel
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: Python
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 23:04:00 +0200, Martin Uecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> There is some other thing I do not like about the way Debian packages
> work. Every package I install can actually completely compromise my
> system, because the maintainer scripts are run as root.
You can, of
Roger Leigh wrote:
> You can't reliably (or portably) check if you are in a chroot.
Hmm, if you're root you probably can. Something like this (completely
untested; probably doesn't even compile):
DIR *d;
int fd;
struct stat s1, s2;
mkdir("temp", 0700);
d = opendir("/");
f
36 matches
Mail list logo
