Hi all,
On Fri, 21 Sep, 2007 at 07:35:47AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Package: liquidlnf
> Priority: Normal
> Version: 2.9.1-2
>
> Please stop using sitetruth.com in your debian/watch -- I think it would
> be preferable to just disable the watch file until uscan gets https
> support, if it does
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 07:42:52AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 10:49:26AM +0930, Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> >
> > * Package name: gitpkg
> > Description : helper scripts for maintaining packages with git
> >
> > This packages provides som
Hi,
IANADD but...
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Then file a bug against *apt* packages and p.d.o to have them support
> displaying info from that field, before or after the d-d-a
> announcement.
you wrote what I thought when I read this proposal. After all it makes
sense to first add support for th
Hi,
While in the process of working on a new fvwm package, I
noticed that the Menu policy has changed some of the old titles to new
ones. For example, WindowManagers => "Window Managers", Modules =>
"FVWM Module" (which is incorrect; the correct way to address the wm
is Fvwm).
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:02:56 +0200, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Quoting Lars Wirzenius ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>> I'd start with amending the Developers' Reference, then having a test
>> added to lintian and linda, and after that announcing it on
>> debian-devel-announce. Then next
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Patrick Schoenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: innotop
Version : 1.4.3
Upstream Author : Baron Schwartz
* URL : http://innotop.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : A mysql a
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Homepage thing, I would much rather see a working design, supported by
> apt and p.d.o, make any changes or tweaks as are needed; and _then_ we
p.d.o already supports it. "apt-cache show" obviouly displays the field.
The work left concerns higher-l
* Elimar Riesebieter [Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:06:21 +0200]:
> It looks like it can be used to strip uri's out of MUA to view i.e.
> inet pages similar to urlview?
I don't know, so you'd have to ask upstream, but personally I doubt it.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó da
* Christian Perrier [Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:02:56 +0200]:
> Again, please comment,
Personally, I think the change that should really go first is lintian/linda
(emitting a warning for packages that put the homepage in the description),
since that's what will make most packages change, and will give t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Deepak Tripathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name : libconvert-pem-perl
Version : 0.07
Upstream Author : Benjamin Trott, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
http://search.cpan.org/~btrott/Convert-PEM-0.07/
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 04:53:34PM +0930, Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 07:42:52AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 10:49:26AM +0930, Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Package: wnpp
> > >
> > > * Package name: gitpkg
> > > Description :
Mike Hommey schrieb:
> What are we going to see next ? Yet another package because someone else
> will feel none of gitpkg or git-buildpackage fit his needs ?
Whats so bad about this? FOSS is much about choice, isn't it? Why
shouldn't the user have the choice to select from different tools? In my
pe, 2007-09-21 kello 16:44 +0200, Adeodato Simó kirjoitti:
> * Christian Perrier [Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:02:56 +0200]:
>
> > Again, please comment,
>
> Personally, I think the change that should really go first is lintian/linda
> (emitting a warning for packages that put the homepage in the descript
Le vendredi 21 septembre 2007 à 20:49 +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld a écrit :
> Whats so bad about this? FOSS is much about choice, isn't it? Why
> shouldn't the user have the choice to select from different tools? In my
> humble opinion it does not make so much sense to pack those tools
> together jus
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:08:12 +0300, Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> pe, 2007-09-21 kello 16:44 +0200, Adeodato Simó kirjoitti:
>> * Christian Perrier [Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:02:56 +0200]:
>>
>> > Again, please comment,
>>
>> Personally, I think the change that should really go first is
* Manoj Srivastava [Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:51:03 -0500]:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:08:12 +0300, Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > At the very least, lintian should stop warning about Homepage:, right?
> > (Sorry if it already doesn't warn, I haven't had time to upgrade and
> > the machine
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 06:33:51PM -0700, Mike Markley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 11:46:18PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Both dkim-milter and libdkim builds libdkim-dev, and libdkim0 and libdkim2
> > conflict too, even though the names aren't
Consider for a moment a typical User-Agent string sent by a Debian web browser:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070802 Iceape/1.1.4
(Debian-1.1.4-1)
Unfortunately, the fact that this information identifies a specific
package and version of that package means that Debi
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 06:03:05PM -0700, Peter Eckersley wrote:
>
> What do people think of picking a single User-Agent string for all
> versions of all of Debian's Gecko-based browsers?
>
It would be sort of pointless unless we could find a way to all browse
from the same IP address.
Regards,
On Sep 22, Peter Eckersley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This means, in practice, that many sites will be able to track Debian
> users by their User-Agent, even if (say) the user is blocking cookies or
> limiting them to a single session and is changing IP address regularly.
This is highly debateab
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: xmms-pulse
Version : 0.9.3
Upstream Author : Lennart Poettering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://0pointer.de/lennart/projects/xmms-pulse/
* License : GPL v2
Programmin
21-09-2007, Bruce Sass:
> On Thu September 20 2007 09:25:23 pm Oleg Verych (Gmane) wrote:
>> 19-09-2007, Bruce Sass:
>> > I'm hoping the dpkg "triggers" functionality Ian Jackson has been
>> > working on will help solve that wart though.
>>
>> How exactly?
>
> Exactly? I don't know. I haven't follo
Quoting Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Actually, policy is usually the last thing that you want to
> do, in the general case. Policy is usually stable (well, not quite as
> stable as it has been this year, but work seems to be easing up a
> trifle, so expect a policy release in
23 matches
Mail list logo
