Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: irssi-plugin-xmpp
Version: 0.13
Upstream Author: Colin Didier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL: http://cybione.org/src/irssi-xmpp/
License: GPL
Description: XMPP plugin for irssi
A
* Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070829 00:22]:
> Why should we force 7000+ source packages clean their environment
> when debuild/pbuilder/sbuild etc will do that anyway? Worse, it's
> not even trivial to clean environment in a Makefile.
Because those source packages are a large amount of code,
Hi,
I noticed that we have a name space polution:
$ apt-cache search libblitz
libblitz-dev - KDE/Qt image filter library - development files
libblitz0 - C++ template class library for scientific computing
libblitz4 - KDE/Qt image filter library
libblitz0-dev - C++ template class librar
Hi Andreas,
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 11:22:10AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that we have a name space polution:
>
> $ apt-cache search libblitz
> libblitz-dev - KDE/Qt image filter library - development files
> libblitz0 - C++ template class library for scientific computin
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 23:00:49 +
Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Originally sent to deban-embedded, resent to devel for a wider
readership with a few clarifications for this list. Note that only pre1
has been uploaded - the diversions remain, for now, and pre2 (including
the below NE
On Tue August 28 2007 3:11:20 pm Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Oh, come on. People who put $TAPE into the default environment may also
> link /dev/null to /dev/hda (or /dev/sda) and complain to the coretutils
> maintainer because ln isn't unable to think for them.
I don't think so. Hasn't tar defaulted
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 10:58:17AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> I don't think so. Hasn't tar defaulted to something approximately
> /dev/rmt0 for *YEARS*, not just on Linux but on just about every platform,
> if -f is not given?
No.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To UNSU
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070828 23:26]:
> This thread has concentrated on fixing packages, but I would appreciate
> a little insight into why someone might set TAPE in their environment by
> default. Surely if you set it by default, you must realse that you're
> asking any such invocation o
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: arcload
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Stanislaw Skowronek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.linux-mips.org/wiki/ARCLoad
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Desc
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 10:58:17AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > I don't think so. Hasn't tar defaulted to something approximately
> > /dev/rmt0 for *YEARS*, not just on Linux but on just about every platform,
> > if -f is not given?
>
> No.
tar != gtar. I think yo
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 09:05:05AM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
>>> I don't think so. Hasn't tar defaulted to something approximately
>>> /dev/rmt0 for *YEARS*, not just on Linux but on just about every platform,
>>> if -f is not given?
>> No.
> tar != gtar. I think you will find that answer
ke, 2007-08-29 kello 18:00 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson kirjoitti:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 10:58:17AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > I don't think so. Hasn't tar defaulted to something approximately
> > /dev/rmt0 for *YEARS*, not just on Linux but on just about every platform,
> > if -f is not gi
* Steinar H. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070829 18:02]:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 10:58:17AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > I don't think so. Hasn't tar defaulted to something approximately
> > /dev/rmt0 for *YEARS*, not just on Linux but on just about every platform,
> > if -f is not given?
>
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 09:05:05AM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> >>> I don't think so. Hasn't tar defaulted to something approximately
> >>> /dev/rmt0 for *YEARS*, not just on Linux but on just about every platform,
> >>> if -f is not given?
> >> No.
> > tar !=
Hi,
How does everyone feel about adding the software scsiaddgui to
Debian. I cannot find anything that provides similar functionality,
and if there is such a tool it is most likely Gnome or Kde specific. I
have spoken with the person who has written the software and he said
he would help
El Mar 17 Jul 2007, Jan Wagner escribió:
> Hi Luciano,
>
> On Wednesday 20 June 2007 19:15, Luciano Bello wrote:
> > I need your opinion and comments about: http://bugs.debian.org/399892
> > Nepenthes has a module (modulehoneytrap.so) linked with libipq (IPQ
> > library for userspace), whic
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:42:01 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> How does everyone feel about adding the software scsiaddgui to
> Debian.
If you are going to be the Debian Maintainer for this package, you
should be able to at least understand error reports from the package
which is very
On Wed August 29 2007 11:00:50 am Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 10:58:17AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > I don't think so. Hasn't tar defaulted to something approximately
> > /dev/rmt0 for *YEARS*, not just on Linux but on just about every
> > platform, if -f is not given?
On Wed August 29 2007 12:16:20 pm John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 09:05:05AM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> > >>> I don't think so. Hasn't tar defaulted to something approximately
> > >>> /dev/rmt0 for *YEARS*, not just on Linux but on ju
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 01:20:52PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
>>> I don't think so. Hasn't tar defaulted to something approximately
>>> /dev/rmt0 for *YEARS*, not just on Linux but on just about every
>>> platform, if -f is not given?
>> No.
> You cite nothing to back that up, and everything I can
Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
If you are going to be the Debian Maintainer for this package, you
should be able to at least understand error reports from the package
which is very difficult if you don't understand the interpreter output
in the case of python. If you are not going to
Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
If you are going to be the Debian Maintainer for this package, you
should be able to at least understand error reports from the package
which is very difficult if you don't understand the interpreter output
in the case of python.
So if I am able to
On Wed August 29 2007 1:28:32 pm Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 01:20:52PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> >>> I don't think so. Hasn't tar defaulted to something approximately
> >>> /dev/rmt0 for *YEARS*, not just on Linux but on just about every
> >>> platform, if -f is not g
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 02:38:37PM -0500, John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed August 29 2007 1:28:32 pm Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 01:20:52PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > >>> I don't think so. Hasn't tar defaulted to something approximately
> > >>> /dev
On Wed August 29 2007 2:51:01 pm Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> GNU tar defaults to stdout since version 1.12, released on Apr 26, 1997.
> So it's been more than 10 years that GNU tar has *not* been defaulting to
> a tape device.
I don't think that's accurate. GNU tar's *configure* defaults to stdout.
Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
If you are going to be the Debian Maintainer for this package, you
should be able to at least understand error reports from the package
which is very difficult if you don't understand the interpreter output
in the case of python.
Consider the followin
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:42:26 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > If you are going to be the Debian Maintainer for this package, you
> > should be able to at least understand error reports from the package
> > which is very difficult if you don't under
Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:42:26 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> If you are going to be the Debian Maintainer for this package, you
> should be able to at least understand error reports from the package
> which
Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
PS.
Of course you do not have time, you run off eveyone who wants to help.
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."
Albert Einstein
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
On 2007-08-29 10:58 -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Tue August 28 2007 3:11:20 pm Eduard Bloch wrote:
>
> > Oh, come on. People who put $TAPE into the default environment
> > may also link /dev/null to /dev/hda (or /dev/sda) and complain
> > to the coretutils maintainer because ln isn't unable to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package name: twitux
Version : 0.50
Upstream Author : Daniel Morales
URL : http://live.gnome.org/DanielMorales/Twitux
License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >If you are going to be the Debian Maintainer for this package, you
> >should be able to at least understand error reports from the package
> >which is very difficult if you don't understand the i
Quoting Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
It's pretty simple, really. If you want to maintain packages in Debian,
at least pretend to want to understand the package and pretend to want
to support them through a stable release. Saying up front that you're
too lazy to do even minimal support isn'
Regarding lazy, it appears that those of this opinion have never
created a distro.
Indeed I am currently:
1) maintaining the project website
2) building the isos
3) uploading the isos for distribution
4) gathering lists of packages to include
5) searching for software missing in Debian which us
http://www.debian.org/social_contract
# Our priorities are our users and free software
We will be guided by the needs of our users and the free software
community. We >will place their interests first in our priorities.
We will support the needs of >our users for operation in many
differen
Folks,
For a long time, the Debian pam package has been carrying a local patch to
add support for Linux capabilities in pam_limits. While catching up on bug
triage work on the package, I've come to the conclusion that this
functionality is broken, useless, and that no one actually uses it; it was
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I must have misunderstood, I thought this was what Debian was all
> about. Here I come in and point out that many users do not have
> everything they need or want, start a project to do something about
> it, and I am met with scorn and "that would be too much extra work
> for
Quoting Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I am not whining, I am questioning the validity of your claimed
philosophical values. Insults do not validate your point of view.
I think your problem is that you have confused "our priorities are our
users..." with "our priority is everything ic
Quoting Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Also, lest we all forget, I am a Debian user. So what you say to me
you say to us all.
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."
Albert Einstein
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
I am not whining, I am questioning the validity of your claimed
philosophical values. Insults do not validate your point of view.
I think your problem is that you have confused "our priorities are our
users..." with "our priority is everything icelinux believes might help
some subset of our us
Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think your problem is that you have confused "our priorities are our
> users..." with "our priority is everything icelinux believes might help
> some subset of our users". To which I can only say, get over yourself.
Do you really expect any differen
Quoting Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
We don't really have time for either sort - that is
what debian-mentors and slashdot, respectively, are for.
Hmm, yes I wonder what people would think were we to post the contents
of our exchange on Slashdot.
--
"Everything should be made as si
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:34:21AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Also, lest we all forget, I am a Debian user. So what you say to me
> you say to us all.
Neat, it's not often that one sees a fallacy of Composition on this list.
+5 originality!
--
Steve Langasek Give me
On Thursday 30 August 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I am not whining, I am questioning the validity of your claimed
> philosophical values. Insults do not validate your point of view.
"I'm not whining, I'm trolling".
Ok, thanks for clearing th
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:46:39 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hmm, yes I wonder what people would think were we to post the
>contents of our exchange on Slashdot.
Do you really thing this is not being read by many, many people around
the world? And also indexed by search engines? d-d is not at al
45 matches
Mail list logo
