Neil Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 02:43:23 -0400
> Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>Can someone tell me what happened to the g77-3.4-doc package?
>
> GFDL problems, AFAICT.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.4.6/g77/Getting-Started.html
>
Thanks for th
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 02:13:26 +0200
"Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In a few days, I'll start filing bugs against packages that build
> unpredictably when extra build-dependencies are present. (More
> precisely, packages where the dependency or file list differ between
> a clean
Qui, 2007-07-19 às 02:43 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi escreveu:
> Hi
>Can someone tell me what happened to the g77-3.4-doc package? Or better,
> How can I get a manual page for g77?
>
> Why I need this:- I was trying to compile refblas3 package with gfortran
> instead of g77. reflblas3's debia
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 08:09:49 +0100
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 02:13:26 +0200
> "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > In a few days, I'll start filing bugs against packages that build
> > unpredictably when extra build-dependencies are present.
On 19/07/07, Neil Williams wrote:
> Why I need this:- I was trying to compile refblas3 package with
> gfortran instead of g77.
That would be very useful for one of my sponsored packages.
Deviating slightly from the topic, could someone point out to a
timeline for the gfortran transition[1]?
[
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: freeplayer
Version: 20070531
Upstream Author: Clement Vasseur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL: http://adsl.free.fr/multimedia/freeplayer/
Li
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 08:09:49AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> As other have noted, the logs are in error. I've checked the log for
> deb-gview in meld and the only difference in the two Depends line is:
> zlib1g (>= 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-1)
> zlib1g (>= 1:1.2.1)
>
> That is NOT a bug!!!
Ouch. It seem
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> Based on the arguments I've seen so far, I'm opposed to using the
>>> package's Standards-Version for this purpose. I think it conflates
>>> different mean
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> Not if you use pdebuild or similarly build in a chroot, which IMO
>>> everyone should be doing.
>
>> I use xen instances and that changes nothing at all.
>
Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 11:55 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
>> Did you see my earlier mail about the very same thing?
>
> No I didn't, sorry.
>
> I'm glad the concept seems to have positive reactions regardless.
>
> -Rob
I have the problem that I
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>sident
>
> Hm. I don't know best to fix this. The problem is that there's now a
> libgssapi2 package which provides a generic GSSAPI layer but no actual
> imp
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: A Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: xdelta3
Version : 30q
Upstream Author : Josh MacDonald
* URL : http://xdelta.org/
* License : GPL v2
Programming Lang: C, Python
Description : programs and libraries t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Martin-Éric Racine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: mkelfimage
Version : 2.7
Upstream Author : Eric Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and others
* URL : ftp://ftp.lnxi.com/pub/mkelfI
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joao Eriberto Mota Filho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: telaen
Version : 1.1.3
Upstream Author : The Telaen Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.telaen.org
* License : GPL
Description : simple and fast w
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: pssh
Version : 1.3.1
Upstream Author : Brent N. Chun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.theether.org/pssh
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 09:02:02AM -0700, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Description : Parallel versions of the OpenSSH tools
What exactly does this mean? What is the software good for?
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
[ please excuse the cross-post ]
[ I would appreciate if you forwarded this message to appropriate
forums ]
Hi,
remember the free laptop I got [0], which I wanted to sell and
donate the proceeds to a Chinese charity?
0. http://blog.madduck.net/geek/2007.03.24_a-thinkpad-x60-for-free
Well, I f
Hi,
* Steinar H. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-19 18:16]:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 09:02:02AM -0700, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> > Description : Parallel versions of the OpenSSH tools
>
> What exactly does this mean? What is the software good for?
Quoting the website from the ITP:
"Wh
I will post updates here:
http://blog.madduck.net/misc/2007.07.19_chinese-charity-sought
Please include the link if you forward my message.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, author
On Thursday 19 July 2007 18:28, Nico Golde wrote:
> * Steinar H. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-19 18:16]:
> > On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 09:02:02AM -0700, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> > > Description : Parallel versions of the OpenSSH tools
> >
> > What exactly does this mean? What is the so
also sprach Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.19.1828 +0200]:
> "What are these tools good for? Mainly for controlling large
> collections of nodes in the wide-area, where faster
> alternatives such as GEXEC and PCP are not available. For
> example, I use these tools on a fairly routine ba
Hi,
* martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-19 18:40]:
> also sprach Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.19.1828 +0200]:
> > "What are these tools good for? Mainly for controlling large
> > collections of nodes in the wide-area, where faster
> > alternatives such as GEXEC and PCP are n
Am 2007-07-12 05:32:37, schrieb Lionel Elie Mamane:
> I say that, because while I really don't intend to make you angry, as
> a casual user of xmms, I don't see the difference. As far as I'm
> concerned, xmms's goal was to be a sound player. And your goal, in
> your FAQ is to develop a "media playe
Le jeudi 19 juillet 2007 à 10:28 +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> PS : what is wrong with XPM ? If it is inferior to PNG, I can convert
> the icons in the packages I maintain. But XPM is a text file, which is
> convenient since we (unfortunately) use this .diff.gz which requires to
> uuencode any
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:53:50 +0200
"Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 08:09:49AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > As other have noted, the logs are in error. I've checked the log for
> > deb-gview in meld and the only difference in the two Depends line
> > i
Hello!
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:02:02 +0200, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> * Package name: pssh
[...]
> Parallel scp (pscp)
FYI (and if you don't already know) /usr/bin/pscp is also provided by
putty-tools.
Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I would much prefer to see a new control field that explicitly lists
>> the supported features. We're going to need that *anyway* for any
>> feature that's only a should or recommended and not a must (s
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 06:47:59PM +0200, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> * martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-19 18:40]:
> > also sprach Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.19.1828 +0200]:
> > > "What are these tools good for? Mainly for controlling large
> > > collect
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If the libraries have different names then there should be
> --with/--without switches possible for configure.
(I'm also upstream for several of these packages.)
I don't know of any Kerberos software, among dozens of packages, that
works this wa
Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do we need package descriptions anybody can understand even
> without knowing anything about the topic or what?
I think it's reasonable that if the package short description matches a
search for "OpenSSH", someone who knows OpenSSH should be able to work
Hi,
* Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-19 20:05]:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 06:47:59PM +0200, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > * martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-19 18:40]:
> > > also sprach Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.19.1828 +0200]:
> > > > "What are th
Hallo Russ,
* Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-19 20:12]:
> Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Do we need package descriptions anybody can understand even
> > without knowing anything about the topic or what?
>
> I think it's reasonable that if the package short description matc
also sprach Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.19.1847 +0200]:
> Do we need package descriptions anybody can understand even
> without knowing anything about the topic or what?
That would be ideal. Most of the time, all it takes is just a short
sentence.
--
Please do not send copies of lis
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 06:37:55PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> Didn't mean to sound accusatory - more surprised. It was strange that
> one package is commonly affected and others that also changed versions
> were not. Maybe something to do with pattern matching failing when a
> version includes d
Can someone tell me where the upstream version of the refblas3 package is
located? Looking at refblas3-1.2/debian/copyright says that the package is
downloaded from ftp://ftp.netlib.org/blas/blas.tgz . However when I
downloade blas.tgz from the above location, it is different from
refblas3_1.2.orig
Re: Steinar H. Gunderson 2007-07-19 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 09:02:02AM -0700, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> > Description : Parallel versions of the OpenSSH tools
>
> What exactly does this mean? What is the software good for?
And what does it do differently from the followi
Hi all,
I wanted to ask you about your opinion regarding fireflier removal.
I personally have been main upstream developer and
debian maintainer of fireflier.
Fireflier is a tool for interactive firewall administration.
As I meanwhile don't have any time to spend on my former project and
nobody
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 21:23:58 +0200
Martin MAURER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The project has been dead for more than a year now. Anyways, apart from
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=433817, which I can
> easily solve by removing fireflier-client-gtk, there are no known
> problem
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 08:46:15PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 21:23:58 +0200
> Martin MAURER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The project has been dead for more than a year now. Anyways, apart from
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=433817, which I can
> >
Hi,
finally (and thanks to Lioc Minier a.o.) the new upstream version 1.0.0
of the libquicktime library has made it into Debian unstable.
The library involves an ABI change relative to its successor 0.9.7 and
had its soname bumped. I already asked all maintainers of rdepending
packages to test-bu
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: kydpdict
Version : 0.9.3
Upstream Author : Maciej Witkowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andrzej Para <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://members.elysium.pl/ytm/html/kydpdict.html
* Licen
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libydpdict
Version : 0.99
Upstream Author : Wojtek Kaniewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://toxygen.net/ydpdict/
* License : LGPL 2.1
Programming Lang: C
Descripti
>> Parallel scp (pscp)
>
> FYI (and if you don't already know) /usr/bin/pscp is also provided by
> putty-tools.
That's something I'm still wondering about - I can't see the advantage
of pscp over scp. Putty is nice to have for all the people who switch
from Windows to Debian and who're used to
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 10:57:35PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> >> Parallel scp (pscp)
> >
> > FYI (and if you don't already know) /usr/bin/pscp is also provided by
> > putty-tools.
>
>
> That's something I'm still wondering about - I can't see the advantage
> of pscp o
Le jeudi 19 juillet 2007 à 20:12 +0200, Nico Golde a écrit :
> > The problem here is that even people knowing something about the topic
> > can't guess what the package can be useful for.
>
> Its like have to know what parallel computing is just
> because you know what a computer is? Well if you
Le jeudi 19 juillet 2007 à 09:02 -0700, Andrew Pollock a écrit :
> Description : Parallel versions of the OpenSSH tools
> These tools are good for controlling large collections of nodes, where faster
> alternatives such as gexec and pcp are not available.
What does this software bring ove
> I don't know for the unix version, but the windows version of pscp can
> load putty configurations, which makes it quite easy to do fancy setups
> (like going through proxies and such) and be able to use them with pscp.
ah ok, seems I've missed some years of putty development since we have
cygw
Nico Golde wrote:
> Do we need package descriptions anybody can understand even
> without knowing anything about the topic or what?
Compare the description for pssh as posted with the descriptions for
what I assume are similar tools, clusterssh and dsh.
Description: administer multiple ssh or r
Steinar H. Gunderson schrieb:
> Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>knetworkmanager
>kpowersave
These two are affected because of unsermake being installed and so the
build fails completely.
unsermake though is scheduled/requested to be removed [1].
So please, don't file bugs for these two
Michael Biebl schrieb:
> Steinar H. Gunderson schrieb:
>
>> Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>knetworkmanager
>>kpowersave
>
> These two are affected because of unsermake being installed and so the
> build fails completely.
> unsermake though is scheduled/requested to be removed [1].
>
Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do we need package descriptions anybody can understand even without
> knowing anything about the topic or what?
A description that gives someone who has looked at the package because
they *might* be interested, enough information to decide whether they
wan
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 06:37:55PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> Didn't mean to sound accusatory - more surprised. It was strange that
> one package is commonly affected and others that also changed versions
> were not. Maybe something to do with pattern matching failing when a
> version includes
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:47:59 +0200, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi,
> * martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-19 18:40]:
>> also sprach Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.19.1828 +0200]:
>> > "What are these tools good for? Mainly for controlling large
>> > collections of n
> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:40:27 +0200
> Maybe is it time to adopt some required tags in the mail subjects to filter
> spamming activities? Something already adopted for the RT system indeed.
I also am thinking about something new in anti-spam case.
While i'm newbie, let me express the idea.
Do
> This require some work from sender's side, how is using plain MUA<->ML
> interaction. For things like Gmane or reportbug anti-spam rules are
> customizable and known at least.
While defending against spam is being long enough on user's side [0],
why not to apply this little addition to sender's
Frans Pop wrote:
[1] To confuse the general public, this is also referred to as ATA RAID,
BIOS RAID, fake RAID and software RAID, as well as a number of vendor
specific terms such as "Intel Matrix Storage".
Actually, ATA RAID is more appropriate since dmraid isn't limited to
Serial ATA in any w
> > Do we need package descriptions anybody can understand even without
> > knowing anything about the topic or what?
>
> To an extent, yes. The expectation is that the target audience,
> which is a typical Debian user installing packages on a machine, should
> be expected to figure o
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 388 (new: 3)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 89 (new: 7)
Total number of packages requeste
58 matches
Mail list logo
