Joseph Neal a écrit :
Well, my reasoning was, that we just try to wild guess about
user capabilities. I have just learned that user behave very
unexpected and exactly these users happen to be quite vocal
how broken Debian is. I just would like to give them lesser
chances to be correct when they
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hello,
The editor "elvis" is a vi clone that has almost (see below) all
features that one would nowadays demand of a vi-like editor. It is
also significantly "lighter" than the popular "vim" editor.
-rwxr-xr-x root root 451796 2006-10-11 08:13 /usr/bin/elv
Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled:
> GTK+ 1.2 (and GLib 1.2) were abandoned upstream over *six years* ago.
> It's rather probable (nay, doubtless) that there are unidentified and
> unfixed security problems with these libraries.
>
> Given that upstreams have had over five years to port th
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: rebuildd
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://julien.danjou.info/rebuild.html
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Des
Package: ftp.debian.org
As maintainer of gnotepad+ (and gnotepad+-help) it is my opinion
they are past the end of their useful life and should be removed from
Debian.
1) It has some annoying bugs nobody intends to fix (78247, 97764)
2) I severely doubt anybody is using it anymore (it never achie
Hello,
what is the policy about file debian/compat ?
I was not able to find any policy about it in 'Debian Policy Manual' on
debian.org. It seems it should contain package version mentionned in
field 'Build-depends:' in debian/control for building from source package ?
Ie. if my package is buil
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 16:48 +0200, Bruno Costacurta wrote:
> what is the policy about file debian/compat ?
>
> I was not able to find any policy about it in 'Debian Policy Manual' on
> debian.org. It seems it should contain package version mentionned in
> field 'Build-depends:' in debian/control
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 04:48:05PM +0200, Bruno Costacurta wrote:
> Hello,
> what is the policy about file debian/compat ?
It's a part of the interface to debhelper, and as such is documented in the
debhelper documentation.
> I was not able to find any policy about it in 'Debian Policy Manual' on
Hi Bruno
* Bruno Costacurta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-09 16:53]:
> what is the policy about file debian/compat ?
There is no policy for compat since compat specifies the
compatibility level of the debhelper tools and you don't
need to build your packages with debhelper.
> I was not able to f
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote on 09/07/2007 16:57:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 04:48:05PM +0200, Bruno Costacurta wrote:
>> Hello,
>> what is the policy about file debian/compat ?
>
> It's a part of the interface to debhelper, and as such is documented in the
> debhelper documentation.
True.
>> I was
Sven Mueller wrote:
> Also true, but as I frequently need to backport packages to (old)stable,
> I would really like people only to increase the debhelper compat level
> if they really _use_ new features in the new level.
>
> While I backported packages to sarge during the etch release cycle, I
>
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now that Heimdal 0.8 has finally entered experimental, could I ask
> somebody to please check the patch to add versioned symbols in the
> shared libraries?
> The patch from previous versions wouldn't apply cleanly, so I had to
> kludge a patch that would cl
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 12:49:20PM +0200, Andreas Weller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: ITP: umtsmon -- Use it to control UMTS/GPRS cards in notebooks
> Version: 0.6-1
>
> Hi!
> I use this tool for configuring my UMTS card with a GUI. As it is not
> (yet) in the debian repositories I creat
This is a courtesy rejoinder:
Today kile installed without problem. Last time I think that texlive was
not completely loaded into testing.
Art Edwards
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 03:06:36PM -0600, Art Edwards wrote:
In testing, kile has been removed.
That doesn't
Sam Hocevar wrote:
> The tasks
> -
[...]
what about override adjustments? I have packages where I've fixed
clearly wrong overrides and was answering many times the automatic
'override disparity' mails without any answer for years.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, C
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sam Hocevar wrote:
>> The tasks
>> -
> [...]
> what about override adjustments? I have packages where I've fixed
> clearly wrong overrides and was answering many times the automatic
> 'override disparity' mails without any answer for years.
S
On 09/07/07 at 14:23 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Sam Hocevar wrote:
>
> >> The tasks
> >> -
>
> > [...]
>
> > what about override adjustments? I have packages where I've fixed
> > clearly wrong overrides and was answering many times the aut
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: unmass
Version : 0.9
Upstream Author: Mirex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://mirex.mypage.sk/index.php?selected=1
* License : GNU GPL
Description : Extract game archive files
This is a tool to extract
Hi ,
I have a live-CD that i'm building with debootstrap + udev .
everything is fine with the live-CD , however when i try to remove the
"working directory" - i can't remove it due to an existing mounting
point caused by udev .
the (simplified) scenario goes like this:
# debootstrap --include=
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 12:02:32AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > People really do use both package priorities and sections still for
> > selecting packages in the package management tools, and it would be great
> > to have them fixed.
> Seconded. I tried once to install all "optional" packages a
HI,
> # debootstrap --include=udev sarge /sarge-root
> # rm -rf /sarge-root/
> rm: cannot remove directory `/sarge-root//dev/.static/dev': Device
> or resource busy
why do you use sarge? Etch is stable since the beginnign of April, and
it supports udev just fine out of the box.
Also there'
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We have a bunch of override change requests outstanding, mostly because
> the ftpmaster alias is so absurdly heavily spammed that they get lost in
> the noise; having more structured checking of priorities/sections that
> someone actually took the time t
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Also, why don't we create a meta-package in the BTS for priority
> changes?
It would actually just be enough to create a set of usertags for
priority changes, usertag bugs involving priority changes, and then
separate them out.
What it basically needs is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a live-CD that i'm building with debootstrap + udev .
> everything is fine with the live-CD , however when i try to remove the
> "working directory" - i can't remove it due to an existing mounting
> point caused by udev .
the etch udev package does detect that it
24 matches
Mail list logo
