On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 01:11:52PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> I think Ben's point is that we don't know.
>
> You seem to claim that binary units (ie powers of 2) are natural
> everywhere related to computers, but I disagree. It's natural for
> memory and structures like it, but not for bitstre
Hi,
I've posted about this before, but Metalinks are available for Debian
4.0 ISOs now thanks to Manuel @ ftp.iasi.roedu.net. Metalinks contain
checksums, mirror lists, and other metadata in an XML format. They're
used by around 13 download programs such as download managers.
http://download.pac
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: openfire
Version : 3.3.1
Upstream Author : Jive Software <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.igniterealtime.org/projects/openfire/
* License : mostly GPL, but there are
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: oar
Version : 2.0
Upstream Author : Nicolas Capit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://oar.imag.fr/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Perl mostly
Description : resou
Dear Friends and colleagues,
I am a newbie on this list and Linux but an oldie when it comes to IT
industry.
Can i highlight that the main attraction of ubuntu amongst all other Linux
derivates is its accessibility to end users. For this feature to continue to
flourish it is best if everything
Hello,
Lucas just rebuilt the archive with my new dpkg-shlibdeps and the symbols
file that I provided him
(http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/symbols.tar.bz2) and that I
auto-generated.
The resulting Packages file is here:
http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/Packages.gz (it contains only
binary-i386
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 429888 general
Bug#429888: networking broken after install
Warning: Unknown package 'unknown'
Bug reassigned from package `unknown' to `general'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sy
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package name: grandr
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Intel Corporation, hosted at X.org
URL : http://www.x.org/
License : MIT/X11
Programming Lang: C
Description : gtk interf
[Raphael Hertzog]
> If you encounter any strangeness, please report it so that we can
> check. Those warnings could be the base of some mass-bug filings
> althought we might want to start with the second one (those are real
> bugs, while the other are not creating any technical problem (except
>
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 09:59:53AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Lucas just rebuilt the archive with my new dpkg-shlibdeps and the symbols
> file that I provided him
> (http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/symbols.tar.bz2) and that I
> auto-generated.
>
> The resulting Packages file is
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: sieve-connect
Version : 0.33
Upstream Author : Phil Pennock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://people.spodhuis.org/phil.pennock/software
* License : BSD
Programming Lang
someone who prefers to remain anonymous writes:
> Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> Sorry? Nexuiz 2.3 is already package by the debian games team, uploaded
>> to unstable and requested to be synced to gutsy by my, and available in
>> both distros. What are you exactly requesting?
>
> I'm on X86, 32-bit,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:53:24PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 11:55:33AM +0200, Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy) wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: "Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> > * Package name: libclass-accessor-gr
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 01:39:41PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Both packages have been uploaded at the same time, and I could not
> forsee that it has still not been built and uploaded on sparc on time. I
> think to avoid this situation in the future the correct way was to use
> a versioned "
On 21/06/2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 01:39:41PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Both packages have been uploaded at the same time, and I could not
> > forsee that it has still not been built and uploaded on sparc on time. I
> > think to avoid this situation in the fu
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: mumble
Version : 0.9.4
Upstream Authors: Thorvald Natvig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://mumble.sourceforge.net/
* License : GNU GPL
Description : Voice chat client
This is a low-latency, high quality v
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: vtp
Version : 070331
Upstream Authors: Ben Discoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.vterrain.org/
* License : see below
Description : Virtual Terrain Project
Software for the creation of tools for eas
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, David Nusinow wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Package name: grandr
FYI grandr is also the name of the Gnome applet in gnome-randr-applet.
This conflict is somewhat confusing (at least it was for me when I first
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 05:05:45PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, David Nusinow wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Package name: grandr
>
> FYI grandr is also the name of the Gnome applet in gnome-randr-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 14:51:00 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Le mercredi 30 mai 2007 à 07:53 +0300, Guillem Jover a écrit :
>>> If you need to retrieve the conffile info, which is why most of those
>>> packages are poking at
Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW the new documentation on the wiki [1] regarding dpkg-query was not
> entirely
> correct. It missed to strip of the "obsolete" keyword. I updated the wiki
> accordingly.
Ah, yes. Where is the meaning of that keyword documented?
Regards, Frank
--
Hi
I am trying to figure out why texmacs has not entered into testing. I
visited http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=texmacs but there I
was not able to find any useful information. All it says is
* trying to update texmacs from 1:1.0.6-11 to 1:1.0.6.10-1 (candidate is 31
days old)
On to, 2007-06-21 at 14:40 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> I am trying to figure out why texmacs has not entered into testing. I
> visited http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=texmacs but there I
> was not able to find any useful information. All it says is
>
> * trying to upda
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 11:20:53PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Does anyone know the whereabouts of Yvan? May I consider him missing in
> action?
>
It's a good think to CC [EMAIL PROTECTED] in those cases for tracking.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:11:23PM -0400, Ivan Jager wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Ben Finney wrote:
The problem is that *many* cases are incorrect; we can't say that
*all* of them are. That uncertainty is not amenable to a mindless text
substitution wi
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On to, 2007-06-21 at 14:40 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
>> I am trying to figure out why texmacs has not entered into testing. I
>> visited http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=texmacs but there
>> I was not able to find any useful information. All it s
Hi,
During my talk today at debconf, I discussed the idea of sending mails
to maintainers of packages with serious problems. The audience
welcomed the idea, so I will send the first mails soon.
You will receive a mail:
* if one of your packages has RC bugs older than 30 days in unstable
* if one
Hi,
* Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-22 00:17]:
> During my talk today at debconf, I discussed the idea of sending mails
> to maintainers of packages with serious problems. The audience
> welcomed the idea, so I will send the first mails soon.
That sounds good to me!
> You will recei
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Lucas
> The main problem is with packages that have dummy RC bugs to prevent
> them from migrating to testing (see #395332 for example). Such
> packages are difficult to detect, and, for packages that have been in
> that case for a long time, one might question if t
On 22/06/07 at 00:37 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Hi Lucas
>
> > The main problem is with packages that have dummy RC bugs to prevent
> > them from migrating to testing (see #395332 for example). Such
> > packages are difficult to detect, and, for packages that have
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 09:32:09AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 01:11:52PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > I think Ben's point is that we don't know.
> >
> > You seem to claim that binary units (ie powers of 2) are natural
> > everywhere related to computers, but I disagr
On to, 2007-06-21 at 17:01 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> 1) How can I request for a new build on ia64? or will it happen
> automatically?
This is outside my area of expertese, but I would assume that the
buildds don't automatically re-try a failed build. Instead, they'll wait
for the packa
[Please keep discussion on -devel; -release is not a discussion list and
I'm not subscribed to -qa :-)]
Hi,
As discussed during DebConf, I'd like to propose a new release goal: Packages
should not only build in clean chroots, but also in non-clean environments.
Specifically, adding extra package
Hi,
Steinar H. Gunderson schrieb:
> To this end, I've set up the "build daemon from Hell" (BDFH) on my machine,
> currently doing script testing.
Would it make sense to run the build under auto-apt, to see whether it
tries to access some file in another package? That would obviously not
be a rep
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 396 (new: 12)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 83 (new: 0)
Total number of packages request
35 matches
Mail list logo
