Re: Two proposals for a better Lenny (testing related).

On Tue June 12 2007 02:25:59 pm Gustavo Franco wrote: > That's the point, you would be using testing for development and > cherry picking changes from unstable manually. Remember that in this > scenario we still have unstable to testing transition so if you don't > push stuff manually it will get t

Re: Using standardized SI prefixes

#include * Bernhard R. Link [Tue, Jun 12 2007, 12:18:22AM]: > > Excuse me? Pretty simple example: you have only 2.03 GB (real GB) > > remaining free space (seen in some disk info tool) on your harddisk and > > you are fetching a 2GB file (2 fake GB, 2GiB in fact). So what, it > > breaks about 99%

Re: Using standardized SI prefixes

#include * Roberto C. Sánchez [Tue, Jun 12 2007, 03:43:29AM]: > Why do you think that the marketing materials for most hard drives > include the note that 1 GB = 1 000 000 000 bytes? If the SI prefixes > only ever held their *precise* meanings, then such clarifications would > not be necessary.

Re: Using standardized SI prefixes

Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 15:50 +0100, Alex Jones wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 09:24 +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > Especially nowadays with terabyte disks coming out and hitting the > > consumer market, there is *no place* for 10% of ambi

Re: Two proposals for a better Lenny (testing related).

Ter, 2007-06-12 às 22:05 +0200, Frans Pop escreveu: > Personally I think the current system is fine. just a note, as user: The current system is fine but: - priority from unstable should less than testing or stable ( as i think - not for sure - happens nowadays). On experimental has less priorit

Re: Two proposals for a better Lenny (testing related).

Ter, 2007-06-12 às 23:32 +0200, Vince H&K escreveu: > Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > On 12/06/07 at 22:23 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > >> NO! > >> > >> unstable is meant for packages that should be in the next stable release, > >> as such only packages that are in the maintainer's opinion ready to > >> m

Re: Upgrade of the pam library?

Laurent Bigonville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As a maintainer of a pam module (pam-keyring), I would like to know if > there is any plan to upgrade the version of the libpam in lenny. > The current version is antique (0.79 vs 0.99) and doesn't have some > features as syslog logging... Just FYI

Re: Using standardized SI prefixes

On Tuesday 12 June 2007 01:48:27 Josselin Mouette wrote: > > Why do you think that the marketing materials for most hard drives > > include the note that 1 GB = 1 000 000 000 bytes? > > Maybe because they are sold in the US, one of the 3 countries where SI > units are not standard? Even in the US

Re: Two proposals for a better Lenny (testing related).

On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 04:40:54PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote: > >* What do you mean by "switch unstable automatic nature to not > > automatic" > In a few words, move the 'NotAutomatic: yes' from experimental to > unstable and burn experimental. So in your opinion, the glibc maintainers should

Re: Using standardized SI prefixes

On Monday 11 June 2007 22:57:00 John H. Robinson, IV wrote: > It does solve a real problem. It solves an ambiguity. Does k mean 1000 > or 1024? Does M mean 100 or 1048576? > > Answer: k mean 1 000 > ki means 1 024 > m means 1 000 000 > mi means 1 048 576 > > No more ambiguit

Re: Two proposals for a better Lenny (testing related).

On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 12:42:34AM +0100, Luis Matos wrote: > Ter, 2007-06-12 às 22:05 +0200, Frans Pop escreveu: > > Personally I think the current system is fine. > just a note, as user: > The current system is fine but: > - priority from unstable should less than testing or stable ( as i > th

Re: [OT] howto file bugs in debian bug-tracker

On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Christian Perrier wrote: > Indeed, it would probably benefit both Ubuntu and Debian if a way to > link bugs between Launchpad and the Debian BTS. I see something like > Pierre Habouzit's bts-link which allows to automatically track > upstream bugs in Debian BTS as long as the b

Re: APT 0.7 for sid

Michael Vogt wrote: > This is currently turned off because of the concerns raised. its a > matter of changing the default of "APT::Install-Recommends" to true. > > I want to turn it on by default in the near future, but with a > reasonable warning time for the transition. Here are the places we'

Re: Two proposals for a better Lenny (testing related).

Am Dienstag, den 12.06.2007, 17:25 -0300 schrieb Gustavo Franco: > On 6/12/07, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 12 June 2007 21:40, Gustavo Franco wrote: > > > > * What effect do you think removing experimental will have on > > > > unstable? * How do you think it will have that e

Re: Bug#428575: ITP: plexus-i18n -- Plexus internationalisation package.

Hi Paul, On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 18:48:41 +0100, Paul Cager wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Paul Cager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * Package name: plexus-i18n > Version : 1.0-beta-6 > Upstream Author : Plexus Developers > * URL : http://plexus.codehaus.o

Best practices for cron jobs?

Hi everybody, What is the best practice when it comes to packages that need to access a network resource in a daily cronjob? Specifically I'd like to have a daily cronjob included in the spamassassin package that will run sa-update. I planned to do this by dropping a con job in cron.daily. As was

ya sabes que es gubiz.com?

Si no puedes ver las imágenes, Haz Clic Aquí

<    1   2