Re: possible grave bug in debian-installer or ifupdown?

2006-12-18 Thread Bastian Venthur
Anthony Towns schrieb: >> I checked >> /etc/network/interfaces on both boxes and noticed the following line: >> allow-hotplug eth0 >> after replacing it with >> auto eth0 > > allow-hotplug interfaces will only be brought up by hotplug (or manually); > you might've deinstall hotplug and r

Re: Bug#403506: ITP: fdisk -- linux fdisk replacement based on libparted

2006-12-18 Thread Michael Banck
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 10:58:29PM +0100, Julien Louis wrote: > I'll rename the package to gnu-fdisk reflect binary name changes. The usual naming scheme seems to be to prepend the name with a `g', see glibc, gcc, gawk, etc. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

block device served over network connections

2006-12-18 Thread Warren Turkal
DDs, I am looking for some info on this subject. I have looked at both the aoetools and open-iscsi for a solution to the following problem. I have a block device that is served over aoe. Basically, I would like to take two of these devices (e0.0 and e1.0) and create a raid1 with software RAID.

Re: Bug#403506: ITP: fdisk -- linux fdisk replacement based on libparted

2006-12-18 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Michael Banck wrote: On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 10:58:29PM +0100, Julien Louis wrote: I'll rename the package to gnu-fdisk reflect binary name changes. The usual naming scheme seems to be to prepend the name with a `g', see glibc, gcc, gawk, etc. and so gdisk (because g fo

Re: Bug#403506: ITP: fdisk -- linux fdisk replacement based on libparted

2006-12-18 Thread Luca Capello
Hello! On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 09:50:10 +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 10:58:29PM +0100, Julien Louis wrote: >> I'll rename the package to gnu-fdisk reflect binary name changes. > > The usual naming scheme seems to be to prepend the name with a `g', > see glibc, gcc, gawk, etc.

Bug#403584: RFH: apt-cacher -- caching proxy system for Debian package and source files

2006-12-18 Thread Eduard Bloch
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I request assistance with maintaining the apt-cacher package. It needs a Perl coder with sufficient knowledge about network programming and HTTP protocol AND lots of spare time to test the fixes. And/Or help developing or rewritting the incomplete designated success

Re: possible grave bug in debian-installer or ifupdown?

2006-12-18 Thread Luca Capello
Hello! On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 07:36:01 +0100, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 09:58:48PM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote: >> I issued: >> # ifup eth0 >> manually on both boxes but nothing happened. > > This probably means that ifup thought the interface was already up > -- ie there

Is bug #399214 release critical? (Upgrade from version not in debian currently)

2006-12-18 Thread Tom Cato Amundsen
Is http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=399214 release critical? The version of solfege in etch fails to upgrade from a version that does _not exist_ in neither stable, testing or sid now. It was a version that earlier was in testing, but has been replaced by a more recent version. --

Re: Name of a binary package according to sonames

2006-12-18 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 06:07:18PM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > I'm maintaining libtorrent package, this source builds 2 binaries, > libtorrent-rakshasa (is libtorrent9 last version in debian archive) and > libtorrent-rakshasa-dev (i

Re: Is bug #399214 release critical? (Upgrade from version not in debian currently)

2006-12-18 Thread Daniel J. Priem
I think such bugs can be easily closed. Regards Daniel Tom Cato Amundsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=399214 release > critical? > > The version of solfege in etch fails to upgrade from a version that does > _not exist_ in neither stable, test

Re: Is bug #399214 release critical? (Upgrade from version not in debian currently)

2006-12-18 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:55:47PM +0100, Daniel J. Priem wrote: > I think such bugs can be easily closed. > I disagree. If it was previously in testing, it could conceivably have been removed without the user noticing. In which case, it would be acceptable for the user to expect that the upgrad

Re: arches and etch

2006-12-18 Thread Tim Cutts
On 3 Nov 2006, at 5:30 pm, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 04:55:04PM +, Tim Cutts wrote: The 486 was the first CPU in the X86 family to have an integral FPU. Only the 486DX; the 486SX didn't. Being thoroughly pedantic, yes it did, but it was disabled in the hardw

Re: Downgrading the priority of nfs-utils [was: Re: Upgrading the priority of ucf]

2006-12-18 Thread Tim Cutts
On 6 Nov 2006, at 9:26 am, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le jeudi 02 novembre 2006 à 05:22 -0800, Josh Triplett a écrit : I would suggest b); reducing the "standard" set of packages seems like a feature, it won't break upgrades (if installed, the package will stay installed), and new installs don'

Re: Downgrading the priority of nfs-utils

2006-12-18 Thread Tim Cutts
On 7 Nov 2006, at 3:40 am, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Le jeudi 02 novembre 2006 à 05:22 -0800, Josh Triplett a écrit : I would suggest b); reducing the "standard" set of packages seems like a feature,

Re: Downgrading the priority of nfs-utils

2006-12-18 Thread Tim Cutts
On 7 Nov 2006, at 11:17 pm, Brian May wrote: "Goswin" == Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED] tuebingen.de> writes: Goswin> But wouldn't you be surprised if "mount -tnfs server:/path Goswin> /local/path" suddenly wouldn't work anymore in a fresh Goswin> install? Not really, no

Re: Accepted attr 1:2.4.32-1.1 (source amd64)

2006-12-18 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Andreas Barth a écrit : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Format: 1.7 > Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 13:42:31 + > Source: attr > Binary: libattr1 attr libattr1-dev > Architecture: source amd64 > Version: 1:2.4.32-1.1 > Distribution: unstable > Urgency: emergency > Maintainer: Nat

Re: please let mplayer into testing

2006-12-18 Thread A Mennucc
[actually, my original mail had to go to d-release, but I miss-auto-completed the To:] Bill Allombert ha scritto: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 11:09:09PM +0100, A Mennucc wrote: >> anyway, shortly after I wrote that email, the situation reverted again >> (for worse); so currently there is no agreemen

Need help with RC #396817

2006-12-18 Thread John Goerzen
Hi, #396817 was reported back in November. Ian Lynagh, maintainer of GHC, and I both believe that the build was proceeding normally and that on the platform in question, it is not unreasonable to expect it to take quite a bit of time to compile that file. I have tried, in vain, to figure out som

Bug#403619: RFP: languagetool -- rule-based language checker

2006-12-18 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Package name: languagetool Version: 0.8.6 Upstream Author: Daniel Naber (naber at danielnaber de) URL: http://www.danielnaber.de/languagetool License: Mostly LGPL, also some BSD, Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.0 Description: A rule-based language checker

Re: Accepted attr 1:2.4.32-1.1 (source amd64)

2006-12-18 Thread Andreas Barth
* Aurelien Jarno ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061218 15:28]: > Andreas Barth a écrit : > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Format: 1.7 > > Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 13:42:31 + > > Source: attr > > Binary: libattr1 attr libattr1-dev > > Architecture: source amd64 > > Version: 1:2

Re: block device served over network connections

2006-12-18 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> Are there any other packages I should be looking at to make this happen? > > If not, maybe this is something that should be considered by some people > who care as network based block storage is getting more common. With NBD, > AOE, and ISCSI (and others I am sure), I don't think that each packa

Re: Bug is very vague, should I close it?

2006-12-18 Thread Jose Luis Rivas Contreras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ben Finney escribió: > Jose Luis Rivas Contreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] >> >> So, should I close this bug? There's a lot of bugs requesting >> specific features[1] so I don't think this bug it's necessary. > > You could enlist the bug submi

Re: possible grave bug in debian-installer or ifupdown?

2006-12-18 Thread Gabor Gombas
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 09:23:13AM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote: > But who has created the allow-hotplug-line? I thought hotplug is dead? Doesn't matter, udev handles "allow-hotplug" interfaces just fine, I use it on several machines. But the last time I used the Etch installer was around May...

Re: Name of a binary package according to sonames

2006-12-18 Thread Jose Luis Rivas Contreras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kurt Roeckx escribió: > On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 06:07:18PM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> I'm maintaining libtorrent package, this source builds 2 binaries, >> libtorrent-rakshasa (is l

Re: Name of a binary package according to sonames

2006-12-18 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 11:14:33AM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 06:07:18PM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> I'm maintaining libtorrent

Re: Need help with RC #396817

2006-12-18 Thread Carlo Segre
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, John Goerzen wrote: 2) At least build and upload this package? Hi John: I have it building now. I'll let you know the outcome. Carlo -- Carlo U. Segre -- Professor of Physics Associate Dean for Special Projects, Graduate College Illinois Institute of Technology Vo

Re: Name of a binary package according to sonames

2006-12-18 Thread Jose Luis Rivas Contreras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kurt Roeckx escribió: > On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 11:14:33AM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >>> On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 06:07:18PM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote: -BEGIN PGP

ÅÞÈÖ ßÜÇÔ ãÜä íæÑíÜßÜÇ

2006-12-18 Thread Eureka Electronics
Title: Eureka

Re: Name of a binary package according to sonames

2006-12-18 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:09:13PM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote: > > The version I'm building is libtorrent-0.11.0 so I don't think I should > call the binary libtorrent10. > >>> Please check the real soname with objdump -p libtorrent-0.11.0 |grep > >>> SONAME > >> The real

Re: Name of a binary package according to sonames

2006-12-18 Thread Jose Luis Rivas Contreras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kurt Roeckx escribió: > On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:09:13PM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote: >> The version I'm building is libtorrent-0.11.0 so I don't think I should >> call the binary libtorrent10. > Please check the real soname wi

Re: Need help with RC #396817

2006-12-18 Thread John Goerzen
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 10:55:48AM -0600, Carlo Segre wrote: > On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, John Goerzen wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >#396817 was reported back in November. Ian Lynagh, maintainer of GHC, > >and I both believe that the build was proceeding normally and that on > >the platform in question, it is

Re: Need help with RC #396817

2006-12-18 Thread Carlo Segre
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, John Goerzen wrote: Hi, #396817 was reported back in November. Ian Lynagh, maintainer of GHC, and I both believe that the build was proceeding normally and that on the platform in question, it is not unreasonable to expect it to take quite a bit of time to compile that fil

Re: Bug#402622: bug still not fixed

2006-12-18 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le samedi 16 décembre 2006 à 00:16 +0100, Marco d'Itri a écrit : > On Dec 14, Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Let's say it this way: which devices that use the MMC protocol (or SD > > storage) > > are non-removable? > Nevermind, I tought that the MTD drivers shared the same infr

Re: Bug#403584: RFH: apt-cacher -- caching proxy system for Debian package and source files

2006-12-18 Thread Adrian von Bidder
[There is a X-debbugs-cc header which allows easier handling of bug mail gated to the lists] On Monday 18 December 2006 10:16, Eduard Bloch wrote: > And/Or help developing or rewritting the incomplete designated > successor, apt-cacher-ng (currently C++ with some sugar). Not to dissuade anyone f

Re: Name of a binary package according to sonames

2006-12-18 Thread Felipe Sateler
Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote: > I'm more confused since I renamed the package to libtorrent10-rakshasa > and libtorrent-rakshasa10 and lintian keeps giving me the warning... I am giving a try at the rasterbar's library, and ran into the same issue. I asked on #debian-mentors and they told me t

Re: possible grave bug in debian-installer or ifupdown?

2006-12-18 Thread Florian Weimer
* Gabor Gombas: > On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 09:23:13AM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote: > >> But who has created the allow-hotplug-line? I thought hotplug is dead? > > Doesn't matter, udev handles "allow-hotplug" interfaces just fine, I use > it on several machines. I've seen it quite a few times that

Re: Need help with RC #396817

2006-12-18 Thread Carlo Segre
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, John Goerzen wrote: On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 10:55:48AM -0600, Carlo Segre wrote: On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, John Goerzen wrote: Hi, #396817 was reported back in November. Ian Lynagh, maintainer of GHC, and I both believe that the build was proceeding normally and that on the

Re: Name of a binary package according to sonames

2006-12-18 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:52:40PM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote: > > If the soname is set to libtorrent.so.10, it means applications will > > start to look for a file called "/usr/lib/libtorrent.so.10". That will > > probably be a symlink in your case to libtorrent-0.11.0, which looks >

Re: Downgrading the priority of nfs-utils [was: Re: Upgrading the priority of ucf]

2006-12-18 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 02:01:11PM +, Tim Cutts wrote: > I still use it on some real-world servers, but I can't now remember > why. I definitely found something which only worked with the > userland server. uid mapping, perhaps? /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To

Re: Bug#403506: ITP: fdisk -- linux fdisk replacement based on libparted

2006-12-18 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/18/06 03:58, Luca Capello wrote: > Hello! > > On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 09:50:10 +0100, Michael Banck wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 10:58:29PM +0100, Julien Louis wrote: >>> I'll rename the package to gnu-fdisk reflect binary name changes. >> The

Re: Bug is very vague, should I close it?

2006-12-18 Thread Ben Finney
Jose Luis Rivas Contreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ben Finney escribió: > > Jose Luis Rivas Contreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [...] > >> > >> So, should I close this bug? There's a lot of bugs requesting > >> specific features[1] so I don't think this bug it's necessary. > > > > You co

Re: Is bug #399214 release critical? (Upgrade from version not in debian currently)

2006-12-18 Thread Yavor Doganov
Daniel J. Priem wrote: > > I think such bugs can be easily closed. The bug is closed with the last upload to sid, the question is whether it should be considered as RC and if the release team will approve the fix for Etch. When upgrading from Sarge to Etch there is no issue, but for users like m

Re: possible grave bug in debian-installer or ifupdown?

2006-12-18 Thread Jim Crilly
On 12/18/06 08:18:54PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Gabor Gombas: > > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 09:23:13AM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote: > > > >> But who has created the allow-hotplug-line? I thought hotplug is dead? > > > > Doesn't matter, udev handles "allow-hotplug" interfaces just fine, I

Advice: managing inetd entries for cvs

2006-12-18 Thread Steve McIntyre
Hi, I've got a serious bug (#403334) open against cvs over the way it handles some of its configuration via debconf, specifically its inetd configuration for the pserver. At the moment, the package will reconfigure inetd on each upgrade, which is quite clearly a bug. If the local admin has changed

Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C7=CD=E1=EC =E6 =C7=CC=E3=E1 =CA=CC=E3=DA =C8=E4=C7=CA ?= æ ÔÈÇÇÈ ÇáÎáíÌ

2006-12-18 Thread ÇáÏáÚ ßáå
ÍíÇßã æíÇäÇ ÈÇÍáì æ ÇÌãá ÊÌãÚ ááÈäÇÊ æ ÇáÔÈÇÈ æ ÔÇÊ ÝÑíÏ ãä äæææÚå ãÏãæÌ ÈÇáãäÊÏì Ííßã http://www.al-rayyan.org/forums -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Name of a binary package according to sonames

2006-12-18 Thread Jose Luis Rivas Contreras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kurt Roeckx escribió: > On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:52:40PM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote: >>> If the soname is set to libtorrent.so.10, it means applications will >>> start to look for a file called "/usr/lib/libtorrent.so.10". That will >>>

Re: Name of a binary package according to sonames

2006-12-18 Thread Jose Luis Rivas Contreras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Felipe Sateler escribió: > Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote: > >> I'm more confused since I renamed the package to libtorrent10-rakshasa >> and libtorrent-rakshasa10 and lintian keeps giving me the warning... > > I am giving a try at the rasterbar's l

Bug#403704: ITP: serf -- High-performance asynchronous HTTP client library

2006-12-18 Thread Kobayashi Noritada
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Noritada Kobayashi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: serf Version : 0.1.0 Upstream Author : The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/) * URL : http://code.google.com/p/serf/ * License : Apache License 2.0