I'm away from my office until December 11. I am accessing my email but
there may be some delay in your receiving a reply.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> When using CDBS, what is the best way to conditionally apply an
> architecture-dependent patch. I'm using CDBS, but not yet using a
> patch system such as simple-patchsys, dpatch, or quilt, so
> recommendations of a patch system are welcome. Currently I
On Tuesday 28 November 2006 07:53, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> This new package is a major change compared to the old version.
> Therefore, we want people to test it as much as possible!
Hi Fabian,
can you explain short, what are the changes?
Thanks and with kind regards, Jan.
--
Write never mail
Hello.
It seems testing and unstable change twice a day now, which is fantastic.
Is it going to be announced somewhere or it is still a beta feature?
[ I didn't find anything about this in debian-announce or debian-mirrors ].
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
* Santiago Vila ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061128 11:34]:
> It seems testing and unstable change twice a day now, which is fantastic.
Also britney runs now twice per day, and ftp-master host has changed
(now ries).
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 05:56:55PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > *) should there be a lintian warning for this?
>
> I took a look at the /u/l/e-c/p/i/* files in my sistem. There are as
> many different ways to write them as there are file
Hallo,
I don't intend to do any advocacy. I just wish to politely point Your
attention to the bug 398373 that IMO is critical to be resolved before
Etch reach stable statute (that is every day closer and many people are
happy because that, including myself :-)
Best regards
Peter Tuharsky
severity 398373 grave
thanks
* Mgr. Peter Tuharsky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061128 12:07]:
> I don't intend to do any advocacy. I just wish to politely point Your
> attention to the bug 398373 that IMO is critical to be resolved before
> Etch reach stable statute (that is every day closer and many p
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 11:05 +0100, Jan Wagner wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 November 2006 07:53, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> > This new package is a major change compared to the old version.
> > Therefore, we want people to test it as much as possible!
> can you explain short, what are the changes?
Sure.
Le mardi 28 novembre 2006 à 12:16 +0100, Andreas Barth a écrit :
> severity 398373 grave
> thanks
>
> * Mgr. Peter Tuharsky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061128 12:07]:
> > I don't intend to do any advocacy. I just wish to politely point Your
> > attention to the bug 398373 that IMO is critical to be reso
* Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061128 12:29]:
> Le mardi 28 novembre 2006 à 12:16 +0100, Andreas Barth a écrit :
> > * Mgr. Peter Tuharsky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061128 12:07]:
> > > I don't intend to do any advocacy. I just wish to politely point Your
> > > attention to the bug 398373 that
Le mardi 28 novembre 2006 à 12:30 +0100, Andreas Barth a écrit :
> > FWIW, fixing this bug requires changes in the kernel.
>
> Why that? AFAICR, umount must not return before not everything is
> written down.
I don't think this is always the case.
Of course, if the applet is saying things are OK
* Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061128 12:36]:
> Le mardi 28 novembre 2006 à 12:30 +0100, Andreas Barth a écrit :
> > > FWIW, fixing this bug requires changes in the kernel.
> >
> > Why that? AFAICR, umount must not return before not everything is
> > written down.
>
> I don't think this
Hi
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 10:54:11AM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> Although SWT uses Java, it is not entirely platform independent. It
> requires one jar for 32-bit architectures and one jar for 64-bit
> architectures. I could change libswt-gtk-3.2-java to be an
What do you mean here? Do you mean
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 07:21:53PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 04:04:41PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I would normally recommend quilt, but I'm not sure it has a concept of
> > conditional patches, which may make things awkward later if further patches
> > are req
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:53:23 +0200
Fabian Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
Hi, Fabian,
> If you've been using cyrus-sasl2, please consider spending an hour or
> so upgrading to version 2.1.22.dfsg1-4 (currently in unstable),
> testing, and submitting bug reports indicating suc
Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello!
>
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:56:53 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>> [Goswin von Brederlow]
>>> Shouldn't that be included in popularity-contest?
>>
>> Well, I have had the same idea, but never found time to implement
>> it. It could be added as
"Shaun Jackman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Although SWT uses Java, it is not entirely platform independent. It
> requires one jar for 32-bit architectures and one jar for 64-bit
> architectures. I could change libswt-gtk-3.2-java to be an
> Architecture: any package -- it's currently an all pac
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Philippe Coval <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: whitedune
Version : 0.29beta483
Upstream Author : Stephen F. White (and others)
* URL : http://www.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de/vrml/dune/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 07:58:12 -0500
Michael Alan Dorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyway, that install went fine. I hope today to install it on my
> primary mail server which has postfix and cyrus-imapd-2.2, both
> authenticating against an LDAP db, installed; that should be more of a
> workout
Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi
>
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 10:54:11AM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:
>> Although SWT uses Java, it is not entirely platform independent. It
>> requires one jar for 32-bit architectures and one jar for 64-bit
>> architectures. I could change libswt-gtk-3
Hi
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 02:13:26PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
...CUT...
> The package is architecture independent except for the
> register/address size.
>
> So i386, m68k, ppc, mips all can use the 32bit version.
> S390x, amd64, ppc64, mips64 can use the 64bit version.
>
> I think ha
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
libswt-gtk-3.2-java32
libswt-gtk-3.2-java64
libswt-gtk-3.2-java
Any other suggestions, or completely different approaches?
This seems like a really bad solution.
The package is architecture independent except for the
register/address size.
Matthew Johnson writes:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> >>> libswt-gtk-3.2-java32
> >>> libswt-gtk-3.2-java64
> >>> libswt-gtk-3.2-java
> >>>
> >>> Any other suggestions, or completely different approaches?
>
> This seems like a really bad solution.
>
> > The pa
Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 07:21:53PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 04:04:41PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> > I would normally recommend quilt, but I'm not sure it has a concept of
>> > conditional patches, which may make t
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Santiago Vila ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061128 11:34]:
>> It seems testing and unstable change twice a day now, which is fantastic.
>
> Also britney runs now twice per day, and ftp-master host has changed
> (now ries).
>
> Cheers,
> Andi
Unfortunately that
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 16:04 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I would normally recommend quilt, but I'm not sure it has a concept of
> conditional patches, which may make things awkward later if further
> patches are required.
I've never used it but I think that what the "guards" feature of quilt
0.
I'm happy to report that today Debian popularity-contest passed 2
participants/machines. On http://popcon.debian.org/> you can see
20005 submissions considered. :)
>From the stats, one can see that these are the 10 most used non-Debian
packages (http://popcon.debian.org/unknown/by_vote):
Hi
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 01:41:22PM +, Matthew Johnson wrote:
...CUT...
> >I think having two arch:all packages is better than having 12 arch:any
> >packages where they fall onto two sets of identical apckages.
> >
>
> I'd actually go for 12 arch:any packages myself, it's an implementation
On 11/28/06, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you use simple-patchsys, you can prepend before any "include" line:
ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),m68k)
DEB_PATCHDIRS = debian/patches debian/patches/$(DEB_HOST_ARCH)
endif
to add debian/patches/m68k to the list of directories with patches t
Hi,
do you have any news from this ITP? There haven't been any news for 6
months, and no reply to the long description request.
I have prepared a package and intend to upload it in a few days if no
one objects. Here is the complete ITP information.
* Package name: stardict-xmlittre
Version
On 11/28/06, Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But you will have complicated dependency problems. Or at least
users will install the wrong version, or do you intend to only release
the 64 bit version on 64 bit systems? and the 32 bit version on 32 bit
systems? I do not really see the point
On 11/28/06, Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm personally leaning towards to two arch: all packages (one 32-bit,
one 64-bit) and a meta-package which depends on the right one. I am
considering and open to the one arch: any package though. If it
affects the decision, the binary package
Here is my list:
64-bit: alpha amd64 ia64
The rest are 32-bit.
Am I missing any?
Perhaps this is a suitable feature for dpkg-architecture.
Cheers,
Shaun
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On mar, 2006-11-28 at 14:41 -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> Am I missing any?
sparc64, ppc64, ...
--
Yves-Alexis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shaun Jackman wrote:
> On 11/28/06, Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm personally leaning towards to two arch: all packages (one 32-bit,
>> one 64-bit) and a meta-package which depends on the right one. I am
>> considering and open to the one arch: any package though. If it
>> affects
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 02:41:13PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> Here is my list:
> 64-bit: alpha amd64 ia64
> The rest are 32-bit.
> Am I missing any?
Nope.
> Perhaps this is a suitable feature for dpkg-architecture.
You could just as well do a build-time test of the system. :)
Cheers,
--
S
On Monday 11 September 2006 11:11, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 09:22:08AM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 10.09.2006, 21:22 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> > > For my part, I find it pretty offensive that a mailing list that's set
> > > as the maintainer of a pack
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 05:04:13PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > * Santiago Vila ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061128 11:34]:
> > > It seems testing and unstable change twice a day now, which is fantastic.
> >
> > Also britney runs now twice per day, a
> "Henrique" == Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Henrique> Use --save-after-login and pbuilder login to open the
Henrique> chroot, add the new apt key, and only then run the
Henrique> update.
I tried that, it didn't help.
The only solution I found when I ch
* Shaun Jackman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> 64-bit: alpha amd64 ia64
mips/mipsel, sparc, s390 and powerpc can all come in a 64-bit
flavors, iirc.
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 02:41:13PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> > 64-bit: alpha amd64 ia64
> > The rest are 32-bit.
>
> > Am I missing any?
>
> Nope.
*smirk
> > Perhaps this is a suitable feature for dpkg-architecture.
>
> You could just as well d
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 08:03:33PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Shaun Jackman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > 64-bit: alpha amd64 ia64
> mips/mipsel, sparc, s390 and powerpc can all come in a 64-bit
> flavors, iirc.
None of which are full Debian ports, nor TTBOMK do we ship JVMs for any of
the
As I just installed an amd64 system, I discovered that the cmucl is not
already available for that port. If I'm not mistaken, cmucl needs some
manual bootstrapping.
Wouldn't it be useful to make it possible for a package needing
bootstrap to specify it, so that an unattended bootstrap be possible,
To start with, congratulations to the ftpmasters for keeping up
with the NEW queue. Unfortunately, this email is going to be a
case of damning with faint praise
I'm seeing bugs which were filed as removal requests as early as
August 14 which are still waiting for processing. Unfortunately,
t
45 matches
Mail list logo
