Le jeudi 02 novembre 2006 à 05:22 -0800, Josh Triplett a écrit :
> I would suggest b); reducing the "standard" set of packages seems like a
> feature, it won't break upgrades (if installed, the package will stay
> installed), and new installs don't need to get nfs-kernel-server as part
> of the *de
On Sun, 5 Nov 2006 19:41:40 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
[...]
> + local to create a scoped variable must be
> + supported
Underspecified. local in dash and bash behave differently. In dash the
variable value from outer scope is retained, in bash it is not.
Bugs caused by this do
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 07:41:40PM -0800, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> + the -a and -o test operators
> + must be supported
Why is that needed ?
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 19:41 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Here's a proposed patch. What do people think about this approach? I
> know there was an inconclusive Policy discussion a while back about how
> best to deal with this issue. As you can tell from this patch, I favor
> the approach of docum
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jan Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: php-tidy
Version : 5.1.6
Upstream Author : The PHP group at www.php.net
* URL : http://www.php.net/downloads.php
* License : PHP License, version 3.01
Programming Lang: C
* Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061106 04:41]:
> Here's a proposed patch. What do people think about this approach?
Sounds good, thanks for your work.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006, Jan Wagner wrote:
> Description : tidy module for php[45]
> PHP is an HTML-embedded scripting language. Much of its syntax is borrowed
> from C, Java and Perl with a couple of unique PHP-specific features thrown
> in. The goal of the language is to allow web developer
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: bitefusion
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : J¸rgen Jacobsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Morten
Hustveit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.junoplay.com/
* License : G
On Monday 06 November 2006 12:30, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2006, Jan Wagner wrote:
> > Description : tidy module for php[45]
> > PHP is an HTML-embedded scripting language. Much of its syntax is
> > borrowed from C, Java and Perl with a couple of unique PHP-specific
> > features
Hi,
Maybe you will close #332763 too with your ITP.
M.
--
mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gpg : 0x414EC36E
jid : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
irc : kolter@(freenode|oftc)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006, Jan Wagner wrote:
> Version : 5.1.6
> * URL : http://www.php.net/downloads.php
I don't understand: will you upload the php5 source a second time to
Debian just for the tidy extension?
What about the bugs below?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 07:41:40PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> This flows from the Release policy. Not specifying /bin/bash
> >> in scripts is not considered a RC bug.
>
> > I can try to pro
On Monday 06 November 2006 15:41, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2006, Jan Wagner wrote:
> > Version : 5.1.6
> > * URL : http://www.php.net/downloads.php
>
> I don't understand: will you upload the php5 source a second time to
> Debian just for the tidy extension?
I d
On Monday 06 November 2006 15:03, Emmanuel Bouthenot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Maybe you will close #332763 too with your ITP.
It will get closed by the upload.
With kind regards, Jan.
pgpEKEhLM8NOC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> +the -a and -o test operators
>> + must be supported
> Why is that needed ?
It's in widespread use in both Debian scripts and in upstream scripts.
When we tried to warn about this behavior in li
Michal Politowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 5 Nov 2006 19:41:40 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> [...]
>> +local to create a scoped variable must be
>> + supported
> Underspecified. local in dash and bash behave differently. In dash the
> variable value from outer scope i
I'd like to see this say something about what may be assumed of the
standard shell utilities, as well as the shell itself, and in
particular I'd like to see coreutils bug #339085 addressed [please see
the bug log for my personal very strong opinion on which way it should
be addressed].
zw
--
To
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 09:07:11 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Michal Politowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sun, 5 Nov 2006 19:41:40 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > [...]
> >> + local to create a scoped variable must be
> >> +supported
>
> > Underspecified. local in dash and bash b
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libscgi-rails-ruby
Version : 0.4.3
Upstream Author : Zed Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.zedshaw.com/projects/scgi_rails/
* License : BSD-like
Programming Lang:
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:01:27AM -0800, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> + the -a and -o test operators
> >> +must be supported
>
> > Why is that needed ?
>
> It's in widespread us
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006, Jan Wagner wrote:
> I did split ext/tidy out of the php5 package.
That doesn't sound like a good idea; did you already discuss building
it as part of the php5 package? I could not find hints of such a
discussion in #332763 nor #355976.
Why would you want to upload a se
On Monday 06 November 2006 22:31, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2006, Jan Wagner wrote:
> > I did split ext/tidy out of the php5 package.
>
> That doesn't sound like a good idea; did you already discuss building
> it as part of the php5 package? I could not find hints of such a
> discuss
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006, Jan Wagner wrote:
> > That doesn't sound like a good idea; did you already discuss building
> > it as part of the php5 package? I could not find hints of such a
> > discussion in #332763 nor #355976.
> See
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-php-maint/2006-Nove
Russ's patch is no good, at least, it does not address the problems I
have raised in the past.
A Posix shell is allowed to have a builtin for ANY command without
restriction, and as long as the builtin has the behavior specified by
Posix for that command, it is a "Posix compatible shell."
For exa
Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well we got bug reports for that on firefox, IIRC, and we changed it,
> that was not a real problem to replace [ some != test -a other = test ]
> with [ some != test ] && [ other = test ]...
Yes, a lot of people did fix it, but I'm afraid there are still
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Russ's patch is no good, at least, it does not address the problems I
> have raised in the past.
> A Posix shell is allowed to have a builtin for ANY command without
> restriction, and as long as the builtin has the behavior specified by
> Posix f
On Nov 06, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, a lot of people did fix it, but I'm afraid there are still a lot
> left. We can remove the requirement, but my understanding is that dash
> supports it, which means that it's probably not creating bugs in practice
> (posh isn't really desi
On Nov 06, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Russ's patch is no good, at least, it does not address the problems I
> have raised in the past.
It's still better than what we have now, and solving parts of the
problems is still better than waiting for the ultimate policy change
which
On Nov 06, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > + the -a and -o test operators
> > + must be supported
> Why is that needed ?
Because every modern shell which is not designed to be broken supports
them, and since they are in widespread use everywhere there is no reason
to no su
On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 23:51 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Nov 06, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Russ's patch is no good, at least, it does not address the problems I
> > have raised in the past.
> It's still better than what we have now, and solving parts of the
> problems
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le jeudi 02 novembre 2006 à 05:22 -0800, Josh Triplett a écrit :
>> I would suggest b); reducing the "standard" set of packages seems like a
>> feature, it won't break upgrades (if installed, the package will stay
>> installed), and new installs don't
Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The majority of the Debian (and GNU/Linux systems in general) I see
> tend to not use NFS at all. Do we have any usage statistics for the
> NFS client?
There is this:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?popcon=nfs-utils
But I don't know how accurate the "
Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Le jeudi 02 novembre 2006 à 05:22 -0800, Josh Triplett a écrit :
>>> I would suggest b); reducing the "standard" set of packages seems like a
>>> feature, it won't break upgrades (if installed, the packag
Jan Wagner wrote:
> On Monday 06 November 2006 22:31, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 06, 2006, Jan Wagner wrote:
> > > I did split ext/tidy out of the php5 package.
> >
> > That doesn't sound like a good idea; did you already discuss building
> > it as part of the php5 package? I could not f
34 matches
Mail list logo
