Re: Status of inetd for etch

2006-08-19 Thread Marc Haber
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 19:21:22 +0200, Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >The suggestion to use "nodaemon" as default for exim4 when only handling local >mail will probably be rejected? Of course. You won't get any queue runs and thus mail that cannot be delivered right away will stay forev

ICU 3.6 beta in experimental

2006-08-19 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
I have uploaded a beta release of ICU (International Components for Unicode) 3.6 to experimental. Version 3.4 is currently in unstable and testing. If you use ICU, please try testing with 3.6 beta by developing with libicu36-dev instead of libicu34-dev. If ICU 3.6 comes out in time, I'm hoping

mass bugfiling: dbconfig-common-using packages violating policy 7.2

2006-08-19 Thread sean finney
hey d-d, it was recently brought to my attention that the documented method for using the dbconfig-common hooks in a maintainer's postrm script was non-compliant wrt policy 7.2. policy stipulates that packages can not require use of programs from any non-essential packages in the postrm/purge pha

Re: using long long and printf("%m") in debian

2006-08-19 Thread Steve Greenland
On 18-Aug-06, 16:48 (CDT), Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No, %m is, according to printf(2) manpage: > m (Glibc extension.) Print output of strerror(errno). No argument is > required. > > So why isn't > printf("%s\n",strerror(errno)); > used instead of > printf("%m\n");

Bug#383798: ITP: luacurl -- libcURL bindings for the lua language

2006-08-19 Thread Enrico Tassi
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Enrico Tassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: luacurl Version : 0.2.0 Upstream Author : Enrico Tassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-lua/home/gares/luacurl-0.2.0/?rev=0&sc=0 * License : GPL

Re: mass bugfiling: dbconfig-common-using packages violating policy 7.2

2006-08-19 Thread Miguel Gea Milvaques
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 sean finney wrote: > hey d-d, > > it was recently brought to my attention that the documented method > for using the dbconfig-common hooks in a maintainer's postrm script > was non-compliant wrt policy 7.2. policy stipulates that packages > can not r

Re: [Dbconfig-common-devel] mass bugfiling: dbconfig-common-using packages violating policy 7.2

2006-08-19 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi sean, On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 10:54:06AM -0400, sean finney wrote: > unfortunately, the example packages used as guidelines didn't > make any checks to safeguard this, so i suspect most/all of > the packages using dbconfig-common do not either. si

Re: apache2.2 uploaded to experimental

2006-08-19 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Thom May] > This version is not yet ready for unstable, and hence also not for > etch, because it requires more testing. All maintainers of apache > modules are encouraged to test their modules against apache2.2 from > experimental, and upload tested modules to experimental. In the same vein, we

Re: [Dbconfig-common-devel] mass bugfiling: dbconfig-common-using packages violating policy 7.2

2006-08-19 Thread Torsten Werner
Hi Sean, 2006/8/19, sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: unfortunately, the example packages used as guidelines didn't make any checks to safeguard this, so i suspect most/all of the packages using dbconfig-common do not either. since these are rc-bugs, i don't think the lintian route is the corre