Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Alejandro Rios P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libming-fonts-openoffice
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : OpenOffice.org
* URL : http://www.openoffice.org/
* License : GPL
Description : Fonts for use with the
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 07:57:40AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> PyGBase.cpp: In member function 'nsresult
> PyG_Base::InvokeNativeGetViaPolicy(const char*, PyObject**)':
> PyGBase.cpp:613: error: no matching function for call to
> 'PyG_Base::InvokeNativeViaPolicyInternal(char [256], PyObject**&, i
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 08.08.2006, 02:28 -0500 schrieb Alejandro Rios P.:
> .These fonts canNOT be used with X11 or for printing.
I suggest writing this as 'can NOT'. It's easier to parse and (with the
idea of descriptions' translations in mind) comes closer to what happens
in a translation -- at
Hi list,
I have notice yesterday that the version of Pan has been change to the
coming Pan version 2. For many reasons I find this a very annoying
decision, but these two reasons should cause it to be immediately
removed from the repository:
1) It is VERY unstable - constant freezes and c
--- Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > but some kind of strange feeling continues if I hear this name (and
> > the translation of it). It's just misleading.
>
> Er, just because you have a "strange feeling" doesn't mean the name is
> misle
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 09:28 schrieb Alejandro Rios P.:
> * Package name: libming-fonts-openoffice
> Version : 0.1
> Upstream Author : OpenOffice.org
> * URL : http://www.openoffice.org/
> * License : GPL
> Description : Fonts for use with the Ming Li
Am Dienstag 08 August 2006 09:28 schrieb Alejandro Rios P.:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: "Alejandro Rios P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: libming-fonts-openoffice
> Version : 0.1
> Upstream Author : OpenOffice.org
> * URL : http://www.openoff
Hi,
On Mon, 07.08.2006 at 12:52:26 +0100, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also sprach Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.07.1126 +0100]:
> > what are your problems with CDBS?
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/06/msg00451.html
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/20
Hello Michael,
> I have notice yesterday that the version of Pan has been change to the
> coming Pan version 2. For many reasons I find this a very annoying
> decision, but these two reasons should cause it to be immediately
> removed from the repository:
>
> 1) It is VERY unstable - consta
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 02 août 2006 à 23:15 +0200, Bart Martens a écrit :
> > Instead of editing the scripts in /etc/init.d to give daemons the
> > nicelevel you want (and get prompted at every package update because
> > these files are conffiles) you can just run reniced once a d
Nikolaus Schulz, 2006-08-08 11:50:08 +0200 :
> ... which is something I'd expect to find in ~/bin, but not as the
> single functionality of a Debian package.
moreutils then?
Roland.
--
Roland Mas
If you're ever confused as to which mode you're in, keep entering the
key until vi beeps at you.
At 1155032605 past the epoch, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
> I have notice yesterday that the version of Pan has been
> change to the coming Pan version 2. For many reasons I
> find this a very annoying decision
This was discussed on -devel prior to the decision being
made. I suggest you read up on
Le mar 8 août 2006 00:18, Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
> § 2.3.3, 2.4.2, 2.5.3, 2.6.2:
> *here* the python$version alternative is correct,
> because /extensions/ can be used with a '/usr/bin/python' as soon
> as the python current version is in their supported range.
>
> so take the previous a
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 09:28 schrieb Alejandro Rios P.:
* Package name: libming-fonts-openoffice
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : OpenOffice.org
* URL : http://www.openoffice.org/
* License : GPL
Description
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
Are those fonts manually converted? If not, wouldn't it be better to convert
them as needed instead of yet-another-incompatible-font-package?
The long term plan is for libming to be able to read in TTF fonts directly,
but that's not there yet.
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 14:13 schrieb Stuart Anderson:
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
>
> > Are those fonts manually converted? If not, wouldn't it be better to convert
> > them as needed instead of yet-another-incompatible-font-package?
>
> The long term plan is for libmin
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 11:02:15AM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> On Mon, 07.08.2006 at 12:52:26 +0100, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > also sprach Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.07.1126 +0100]:
> > > what are your problems with CDBS?
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-de
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Are those fonts manually converted?
YOu didn't answer his question.
Fair enough. The coffee hadn't quite kicked in yet. 8-)
Are they manually converted? Or how are they converted?
I wasn't sure what Alejandro had in mind, so I didn't want
to ans
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 14:47 schrieb Stuart Anderson:
> Yes, the packages I have prepared are built as part of the rest of the
> ming package. The ming source package Build-depends on the package that
> contains the TTF fonts that will be converted into a libming font package.
> Upstream ming
close 381992
thanks
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 14:11 schrieb Stuart Anderson:
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>
> > Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 09:28 schrieb Alejandro Rios P.:
> >> * Package name: libming-fonts-openoffice
> >> Version : 0.1
> >> Upstream Author : Ope
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request assistance with maintaining the apt-show-versions package.
The package description is:
apt-show-versions parses the dpkg status file and the APT lists for
the installed and available package versions and distribution and
shows upgrade options within th
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote:
OK. Now, I fetched your -openoffice pakcage and saw that (as I guessed) it
just does OpenSymbol. Can you please name it -opensymbol (to show that it
is the opensymbol font from ttf-opensymbol) then?
Yes, that would be a better naming scheme. I was a li
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 15:10 schrieb Stuart Anderson:
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>
> > OK. Now, I fetched your -openoffice pakcage and saw that (as I guessed) it
> > just does OpenSymbol. Can you please name it -opensymbol (to show that it
> > is the opensymbol font from ttf-
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote:
stable doesn't have the package anymore and oldstable is unsupported.
And dist-upgrades skipping one release is not supported.
But yes, I think so. If not, you can add a transitional package, although
I won't like it because of the "bogus" name...
So
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 15:32 schrieb Stuart Anderson:
> So this should cover it?
>
> Package: ming-fonts-opensymbol
> Conflicts: ming-fonts-openoffice
> Replaces: ming-fonts-openoffice
> Provides: ming-fonts-openoffice
No, Replaces:/Povides:/Conflicts: libming-...
Am Dienstag 08 August 2006 14:47 schrieb Stuart Anderson:
> Yes, the packages I have prepared are built as part of the rest of the
> ming package. The ming source package Build-depends on the package that
> contains the TTF fonts that will be converted into a libming font package.
> Upstream ming (
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
Would it be possible to convert them at installation time?
Yes, it would be possible.
There would be two essential options:
1. creation at installation time:
- possibly only one package for all ming fonts (the tool)
The tool is currently provide
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote:
No, Replaces:/Povides:/Conflicts: libming-...
^^^
important, because woody's package is named
like that. for packages not yet in the archive
(your ming-* you can do that but
Hi Stuart,
El mar, 08-08-2006 a las 08:11 -0400, Stuart Anderson escribió:
>
> I already have package for these fonts prepared as part of the ming
> sounrce package, and am awaiting some feedback from some of the
> packages
> that will use them. Feedback from others would be welcome as well.
>
>
Hello.
I've talk to Stuart since a lot time ago about all this, but forgot to
look over his late work on the fonts part that was missing. I tough that
was a little bit more delyaed than it is. That is my fault for not
checking and I'm sorry.
Now I will test the fonts against my op-panel package,
Hi there,
I'd like to setup a pbuilder or sbuild (preferably pbuilder, but I'm
not sure it's possible) in the way I understand experimental buildds
are setup: to only pull experimental software when it's required by the
build-deps, but keep only unstable software when possible. I woul
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 07:30:14PM +0200, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'd like to setup a pbuilder or sbuild (preferably pbuilder, but I'm
> not sure it's possible) in the way I understand experimental buildds
> are setup: to only pull experimental software wh
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 10:11:15AM +0200, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 07:57:40AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > PyGBase.cpp: In member function 'nsresult
> > PyG_Base::InvokeNativeGetViaPolicy(const char*, PyObject**)':
> > PyGBase.cpp:613: error: no matching
also sprach Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.08.1843 +0100]:
> Wouldn't pbuilder with a basic apt pinning setup be enough ?
Sure, it should work, but pbuilder-satisfydepends does not support
it. Or well, it did not. Looking at it now (0.155),
checkbuilddep_versiondeps seems to do some magi
As it was pointed out by Jon Dowland, please read the discussion on
this list that was started by the maintainer.
Michael Rasmussen wrote:
>
> 1) It is VERY unstable - constant freezes and crashes
Please report such issues using the "reportbug" program or `M-x
debian-bug' if you use Emacs and ha
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libtest-www-mechanize-perl
Version : 1.12
Upstream Author : Andy Lester,
* URL :
http://mirrors.kernel.org/cpan/modules/by-module/Test/Test-WWW-Mechanize-1.12.tar
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Wouldn't pbuilder with a basic apt pinning setup be enough ?
It didn't work in the first place with pinning (it would either not try
installing packages from experimental or install them on upgrades too).
Then I thought I might have forgotten APT::Def
Hello all,
I hope I've got the right list. If not, I appologize; just point the
way and I'll take my question to the proper list.
I'm attempting to write a debian package for our site that installs
configuration files specific to our needs. I'm not a *complete* n00b --
I've written dozens
also sprach Michael S. Peek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.08.2124 +0100]:
> 2) I then divert this file.
Diversions of conffiles are not supported. Check that
/etc/courier/authdaemonrc is not a conffile. If it is, you could
easily lose data in my experience.
> 1) I check for the presence of /etc/co
Hello,
On 23/07/06, Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've created a Debian package. I'm having trouble in that it doesn't
> seem to work at all with any application I tried. Could people try
> out and see if it's going to work?
Actually, I managed to get it working on MacBook with
Thanks for the help, Martin.
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Michael S. Peek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.08.2124 +0100]:
2) I then divert this file.
Diversions of conffiles are not supported. Check that
/etc/courier/authdaemonrc is not a conffile. If it is, you could
easily lose
also sprach Michael S. Peek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.08.2239 +0100]:
> The next time there's an upgrade for courier-authdaemon, won't it
> overwrite my version of /etc/courier/authdaemonrc with it's own?
No way. Packages must *never* overwrite your files in /etc.
> Is this kind of thing addre
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 05:39:48PM -0400, Michael S. Peek wrote:
[...]
> The next time there's an upgrade for courier-authdaemon, won't it
> overwrite my version of /etc/courier/authdaemonrc with it's own? I
> thought that was the whole reason for diversions in the first place, but
> if diversi
Hi,
Alejandro R?os P. wrote:
> "Alejandro (in case you read that in the buglog since your ??%&??
> mailserver doesn't accept mail)..."
Well, it's not personal. It just the mailserver not accepting mail
and that makes problems for reaching you (as in case for this ITP).
As mail is to debian commun
Hi,
Another day, another draft.
Here is the latest update for my take on the new Python
policy document. The current version, and future updates, are to be
found at http://www.golden-gryphon.com/software/manoj-policy/
I am including a text version below.
manoj
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 12:17:52PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > Someone else (lamont) did the changes I requested on p-a-s; now the
> > only remaining problem is that the buildds are not taking the new
> > version of p-a-s into account, because they can't talk to the CVS
> > pserver.
> it is my un
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ben Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: videolink
Version : 0.8
Upstream Author : Ben Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://womble.decadent.org.uk/software/webdvd/
* License : GPL with additions
Descript
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Andreas Barth wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, to
debian-devel-announce@lists.debian.org:
> We have a very tough time ahead of us to actually release in time in
> December 2006, and we all have to set the release as priority one in
> order to make it happen.
In partic
48 matches
Mail list logo
