On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 01:04:41PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I can quote major parts of it by heart since a few years, does that
> > help?
>
> If you like to discuss the GPL with other people, it is irrelevent whether
> you know it "by heart"
On 8/6/06, Michael Bramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Where can we download the script?
Here:
http://svana.org/kleptog/temp/ddtss-0.1.tar.gz
Note, it's a collection of scripts and it needs a little confguration
to work. Please read the README. Contact me if you have any questions.
It's rough,
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> $ telnet cvs.debian.org cvspserver
> Trying 192.25.206.10...
> telnet: connect to address 192.25.206.10: Connection refused
> telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused
> $
>
> Without pserver running, wanna-build can't get its updates
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 10:47:13AM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> > Ryan Murray (w-b admin, DSA) is aware of the problem.
>
> I see that 1.5 week later, the pserver is still not responding. Is
> Ryan on vacation? If so, can anyone else fix the problem for him?
> This issue has been blocking
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 01:04:41PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > If you like to discuss the GPL with other people, it is irrelevent whether
> > you know it "by heart" in case you did not understand it yet...
> If everybody else interprets it signi
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 10:56:24AM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> I am still in hope that there are people at Debian who are able to
> understand license issues without bending things the way they like but
> by correctly following the words in the license text.
Joerg, this discussion is off-
Le lundi 07 août 2006 à 10:56 +0200, Joerg Schilling a écrit :
> My software is definitely free and has no license problems.
You may think so, but the Debian project doesn't. For example, a recent
GR stated that invariant sections aren't acceptable for the specific
GFDL case, and there is no
Hi,
On Mon, 31.07.2006 at 14:54:50 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> With cdbs as negative and alitoh/svn as positive?
what are your problems with CDBS?
Best,
--Toni++
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le lundi 07 août 2006 à 10:56 +0200, Joerg Schilling a écrit :
> > My software is definitely free and has no license problems.
>
> You may think so, but the Debian project doesn't. For example, a recent
As long as people from Debian are on calumia
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 10:56:24AM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > I am still in hope that there are people at Debian who are able to
> > understand license issues without bending things the way they like but
> > by correctly following the words
On Mon, 07 Aug 2006, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Debian must either be able to clean itself from people who use Debian
> for such campaigns against OSS authors, or Debian needs to be called
> a higly suspect and non-free project.
>
You troll around on debian-devel, you troll around on lkml, you seem
also sprach Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.07.1126 +0100]:
> what are your problems with CDBS?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/06/msg00451.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/06/msg00467.html
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 07 Aug 2006, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>> Debian must either be able to clean itself from people who use Debian
>> for such campaigns against OSS authors, or Debian needs to be called
>> a higly suspect and non-free project.
>
> You troll around
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You troll around on debian-devel, you troll around on lkml, you seem to
> be more intelligent, wise, knowledgable, fluent in licenses, all-mighty
> than *ALL* *OTHER*:
> - linux kernel developers (quite a lot)
> - debian developers (quite a lot)
>
> Do
On 8/7/06, Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/6/06, Michael Bramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where can we download the script?
Actually, please try this version:
http://svana.org/kleptog/temp/ddtss-0.2.tar.gz
It's a bit more advanced w.r.t. reviewing, but the nicest thin
Joerg Schilling dijo [Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 12:24:57PM +0200]:
> As long as people from Debian are on calumiation campaigns aginst
> OSS authors, Debian needs to be called non-free.
It's not like publishing software under an allegedly free license
makes you a saint, you know?
> > GR stated that in
Le lundi 07 août 2006 à 12:24 +0200, Joerg Schilling a écrit :
> As long as people from Debian are on calumiation campaigns aginst
> OSS authors, Debian needs to be called non-free.
Why do you have to be so self-centered? This is not a calumniation
campaign, this is not about YOU. We just think yo
Michael Banck writes:
> Couldn't you get the problematic outdated packages (I assume this is
> the case if you're talking about [testing?] transitions) removed
> temporarily?
No, that would not solve the problem. The problem, as the subject
line says, is that the buildds are not building my packa
> Debian must either be able to clean itself from people who use Debian
> for such campaigns against OSS authors, or Debian needs to be called
> a higly suspect and non-free project.
As an outsider of the Debian project, you probably have little
knowledge of all the people you're debating with cu
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 03:01:41PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> Michael Banck writes:
> > Couldn't you get the problematic outdated packages (I assume this is
> > the case if you're talking about [testing?] transitions) removed
> > temporarily?
>
> No, that would not solve the problem. The prob
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 10:47:13AM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>
> This issue has been blocking the Ada transition (19 source packages,
> 11 RC bugs) for about 3 weeks now, and I'd really like to be able to
> proceed.
I don't see how this can be blocking a transition. Please just
do it for the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christoph Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: trafshow
Version : 5.2.3
Upstream Author : Vladimir VorobyevName
* URL : ftp://ftp.nsk.su/pub/RinetSoft/
* License : Free software (See below)
Description : real
Kurt Roeckx writes:
> On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 10:47:13AM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>>
>> This issue has been blocking the Ada transition (19 source packages,
>> 11 RC bugs) for about 3 weeks now, and I'd really like to be able to
>> proceed.
>
> I don't see how this can be blocking a transition
Hi,
Here is round two of my take on python policy. I have
incorporate the correction offered by various people, and read the
documents for python-central and python-support, and incorporated my
understanding of those into this document.
So, this is my take on the new python pol
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> but some kind of strange feeling continues if I hear this name (and
> the translation of it). It's just misleading.
Er, just because you have a "strange feeling" doesn't mean the name is
misleading.
"Med" is pretty ambiguous. _I_ certainly don't have
Hi
I want to suggest to add the new linux version of the p2p Instant Messenger
http://cspace.in
to Debian. Suse and Fedrora have for added value applications a Wishlist in a
wiki. I cannot upload the source code to debian, so please can you have a look
and help?
Thanks a lot. Linux is here:
Hi
I want to suggest to add the new linux version of the p2p Instant Messenger
http://cspace.in
to Debian. Suse and Fedrora have for added value applications a Wishlist in a
wiki. I cannot upload the source code to debian, so please can you have a look
and help?
Thanks a lot. Linux is here:
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 09:18:06PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes:
> But it's not you I need to convince, it is Ryan or whoever admins the
> CVS pserver where P-a-s is. I am also curious, like Kevin Mark, to
> understand the buildd infrastructure better.
>
> --
Hi Ludovic,
my
my changes proposals follow. {+ +} are part I've actually modified.
Le lun 7 août 2006 21:42, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Here is round two of my take on python policy. I have
> incorporate the correction offered by various people, and read the
> documents for python-central and
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: fst
Version : 1.8
Upstream Author : Torben Hohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://joebutton.co.uk/fst/
* License : GPL
Description : enables VST plugins on GNU/Lin
It appears Nathaniel Turner is no longer working on Konversation packagers for
Debian. His personal site: http://debian.houseofnate.net/ shows no activity
since February 1st, and Konversation hackers say they haven't seen him around
for a while.
I was wondering if anyone might know what is up w
tag 381662 + help
thanks
Hi,
xulrunner is failing to build on alpha, and with both escher and goedel
being locked down, I have no access to an alpha machine to at least
understand the issue.
The error itself is
make[5]: Entering directory
`/build/buildd/xulrunner-1.8.0.4/extensions/python/xpcom
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 11:39:13PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi
>
> I want to suggest to add the new linux version of the p2p Instant Messenger
>
> http://cspace.in
>
> to Debian.
See http://www.nl.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ on how to file a "Request For
Package".
--
Lionel
--
To UNSUB
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Miles Bader wrote:
Er, just because you have a "strange feeling" doesn't mean the name is
misleading.
Well, I do not expext that somebody regards my "feelings" and probably
I'm biased. Just regard my previous mail as a slight hint that can
be ignored - but I just wanted to
34 matches
Mail list logo
