On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 15:41:32 +0100, Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>At 1154593998 past the epoch, Eduard Bloch wrote:
>> And you can do all that with dpatch-edit-dpatch and the
>> regular Unix commands without learning another VCS and/or
>> without needing access to it. Advantage? Yes.
>
>So
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 08:21:28AM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> In short, it's a mess. Lots of improvements can be made, to MUAs, MLMs, as
> well as MTAs. An RFC straightening things out could help.
... Or we could all just forget about mailinglists and start using
newsgroups instead. They don
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 03:04:05PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > You know, I use a mail program. Replying to people is in my fingers
> > as "hitting a button". A very specific button, especially for that
> > purpose. I expect my MUA to Do The Right T
Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A few years ago, we had only CVS, which sucked. And now, we have a
> gazillion of different VCSes, all different.
And most of them suck too, in their own ways.
--
,''`.
: :' :Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
`. `' http://people.de
Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> A few years ago, we had only CVS, which sucked. And now, we have a
>> gazillion of different VCSes, all different.
>
> And most of them suck too, in their own ways.
Yup... and you just _know_ whichever one ends up "winning" will not be
the best by mo
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 02:52:50PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Christian Garbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.03.1436 +0100]:
> > reniced does not wait for new processes to act on them. It is
> > designed to be run once a day and affect the processes running in
> > that moment.
> T
also sprach Christian Garbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.04.0038 +0100]:
> To my surprise the description line of my package is quite exact:
> "renice running processes based on regular expressions"
>
> It clearly says "running" and not "new" or "spawning".
I don't think it's clear in any way.
>
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Is the naming so much of an issue? (I always confuse
>> kernel-threads and KDE applications because both start with k)
>
> Well, *d suggests it's a permanently running programme, which yours
> is not. So I'd say, yes.
You could call it "rerenice" (=
* martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060801 18:17]:
> also sprach Bernhard R. Link <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.01.1701 +0100]:
> > Missing $(DESTDIR)s in Makefiles are an example. Especially when the
> > install part was DESTDIRified, but the test before if the file is
> > already there (as make
Hi,
I tried to take a look at the wnpp bug page but neither Konqueror nor Firefox
were able to handle it on my system. 3182462 bytes for the HTML code of a
single web page is a bit much, isn't it?
So I was just wondering if it is really necessary to show 3500 resolved issues
by default? They c
Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> I hope that something can be done about this to make the BTS web pages more
> usable.
>
Are you perhaps not aware of the much smaller indices into the BTS here?
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
Ben
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
Hi,
> I tried to take a look at the wnpp bug page but neither Konqueror
> nor Firefox were able to handle it on my system.
Really? Galeon handles it fine, as does Firefox (the latter on win32).
> 3182462 bytes for the HTML code of a single web page is a bit much, isn't
it?
Possibly. It's also 2
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: logfilter
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Jack Hughes, OPENXTRA Limited, John Brewer
* URL : http://www.logfilter.org/
* License : Apache
Description : a tool for per
Matthew Palmer writes ("Re: Centralized darcs"):
> diff.gz archaeology should not be necessary.
I think this is the root of the key difference between the `like patch
systems' people and the `hate patch systems' people.
`Hate patch systems' people are those who can read code, and prefer
program
Neil McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 05:37:58PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > also sprach Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.01.1221 +0100]:
>> >> Building in chroots *hides* bugs.
>> >
>> > Uh, what
Am Freitag 04 August 2006 13:49 schrieb Ben Armstrong:
> Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> > I hope that something can be done about this to make the BTS web pages
> > more usable.
>
> Are you perhaps not aware of the much smaller indices into the BTS here?
>
> http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
Indeed, did
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 11:23:43AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.03.1116 +0100]:
> > Debian's lists support List-ID, List-Post, and the other List- headers.
> > If mutt's L command doesn't use that to figure out the list reply
> > address, p
Hi,
Am Freitag 04 August 2006 13:39 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> > I tried to take a look at the wnpp bug page but neither Konqueror
> > nor Firefox were able to handle it on my system.
>
> Really? Galeon handles it fine, as does Firefox (the latter on win32).
Really. Firefox gets very slow, ko
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So upgraded systems don't get the benefits of certain changes to the
> installer's
> defaults, or defaults in programs used by the installer.
>
> I first thought of this when I noticed the change in the default tuning for
> ext2 partitions created b
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 03:04:05PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > You know, I use a mail program. Replying to people is in my fingers
> > as "hitting a button". A very specific button, especially for that
> > purpose. I expect my MUA to Do The Right T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/31/2006 04:53 AM, Michael Bramer wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 06:55:19PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
> wrote:
>>On 07/30/2006 03:26 AM, Michael Vogt wrote:
>>
>>>Dear Friends,
>>Hi Michael,
>
> Hi
>
>>>the current version of ap
Le vendredi 04 août 2006 à 09:45 -0400, James Vega a écrit :
> This is something that should be solved on the list manager side by not
> sending a duplicate of the email when it can see that an email was
> already sent to an address it recognizes. In fact, some of the lists
> I'm subscribed to do
On Friday 04 August 2006 09:57, Wouter Verhelst took the opportunity to say:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 08:21:28AM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > In short, it's a mess. Lots of improvements can be made, to MUAs, MLMs,
> > as well as MTAs. An RFC straightening things out could help.
>
> ... Or we
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> This would be absolutely horrible. Most list subscribers use the headers
> to put list email in separate directories, and this would make some
> mails miss from the discussion.
It's an end-user configurable feature of mailman, so you can turn it on
Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think this is the root of the key difference between the `like patch
> systems' people and the `hate patch systems' people.
In my experience, the key difference between whether or not I want to use
a patch system like quilt is whether I have an upstream
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> This would be absolutely horrible. Most list subscribers use the
>> headers to put list email in separate directories, and this would make
>> some mails miss from the discussion.
> It's an end-user configu
On Aug 04, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Outside the chroot, where you probably have auto* installed the
> invocation suddenly works and you get a different generated file that
> might or might not fail.
They would immediately fail anyway on the autobuilds.
--
ciao,
Marco
s
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 12:32:59PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
wrote:
> > I hope we can test the new apt version and can get this version to sid
> > and after some days to testing.
>
> Ok, I will work on a few tests for pt_BR.
>
> BTW, the translations are all in UTF-8,
Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> After every upstream merger, I have to review every patch applied to
>> the package *anyway* to make sure that it's still sane, and I find that
>> easier to do by reading through the contents of debian/patche
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After every upstream merger, I have to review every patch applied to the
> package *anyway* to make sure that it's still sane, and I find that easier
> to do by reading through the contents of debian/patches than by running
> filterdiff on diff.gz and the
> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robert> Are you doing conversions from SVN? Current bzr uses 20MB
Robert> of ram to do a native branch operation in similar
Robert> circumstances. (bug report gets fixed, new at 11 :)).
No, this was a conversion from baz. Mi
Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Friday 04 August 2006 09:57, Wouter Verhelst took the opportunity to say:
>> On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 08:21:28AM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
>> > In short, it's a mess. Lots of improvements can be made, to MUAs, MLMs,
>> > as well as MTAs. An RFC s
32 matches
Mail list logo
