On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 08:28:04PM -0500, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 10:03:14PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 11:25:00AM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > > Note it is unclear whether the makefiles could be called "scripts"
> >
> > Unproven asse
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 06:55:19PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
wrote:
> On 07/30/2006 03:26 AM, Michael Vogt wrote:
> > Dear Friends,
>
> Hi Michael,
Hi
> > the current version of apt in debian/experimental has support for
> > translated package descriptions and we have a the curren
Our new online members service.
Become a member to use the new online home for all \"TRAMPS\" worldwide.
www.trampmagazine.com.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
(Could you please stop cross-posting to debian-devel? The discussion
belongs to debian-python@ and the list is low traffic.)
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I have only one version in XS-Python-Version (say, 2.4)
I think the patch in #378604 enhance this
At 1154196833 past the epoch, Michael Banck wrote:
> It makes no sense to complain about this until we have a
> good default artwork. So let's fix that first, then
> convince the gdm maintainer that we should use this.
Well put. On that note, where is consistent art work being
coordinated? I'm i
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 10:37:54AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> At 1154196833 past the epoch, Michael Banck wrote:
> > It makes no sense to complain about this until we have a
> > good default artwork. So let's fix that first, then
> > convince the gdm maintainer that we should use this.
>
> Well
On 7/30/06, Michael Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear Friends,
As someone who has been loosely following this for a while and
translated a few descriptions, I have a few little questions/comments:
1. The website you provide (http://ddtp.debian.net/) is extremely
light on detail. It contains
At 1154090521 past the epoch, Katrina Jackson wrote:
> PS. Hardware, Hardware, Hardware, I have to confess, if
> there was better hardware support I think most people
> would be happy. Hardware supported by Ubuntu 6 months
> ago, should be supported by Debian by now.
Without further specifics, t
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 09:39:26PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
>> Do you know of a good example of a tool that has successfully shaped
>> Debian development for a large number of people?
>
> CDBS and alioth/svn.debian.org.
>
>
> HTH,
>
> Michael
With
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.30.2139 +0100]:
> I have Reply-To set for fear of horrible flame wars when one DD
> bashes another one's favourite tool, but I will make the results
> public, obviously. Thus, I appreciate if you could take the time to
> drop me a short note
On 7/31/06, Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 10:37:54AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> At 1154196833 past the epoch, Michael Banck wrote:
> > It makes no sense to complain about this until we have a
> > good default artwork. So let's fix that first, then
> > convince
Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Without further specifics, this is not a useful argument to
> have. Assuming by "Ubuntu" you mean Ubuntu Breezy (i.e.
> stable as of 6 months ago), but what do you mean by
> "Debian"? Sarge? Sid today? Sid yesterday? Etch last week?
> If you've only loo
On 7/31/06, Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 20:00:21 +, "Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
[...]
> The packages that aren't under group maintenance and will never be,
> needs more not so strict NMU rules.
Why?
Due to the "my stuff, don't touch that!" c
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 09:39:26PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
>>> Do you know of a good example of a tool that has successfully shaped
>>> Debian development for a large number of people?
[...]
> H
I really believe Debian would benefit if they had a weekly debate. Iunderstand you debate on things you are voting on, but I think it could bebetter if you debated on general concerns. I was reading the "Why Ubuntu has
all the ideas" thread and think two things were apparent.First- Many wrote
I really believe Debian would benefit if they had a weekly debate. Iunderstand you debate on things you are voting on, but I think it could bebetter if you debated on general concerns. I was reading the "Why Ubuntu has
all the ideas" thread and think two things were apparent.First- Many wrote
Message sent to the related projects mailing lists and maintainers.
Time to deal with the goodies, pressure, critics and work...
regards,
-- stratus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
also sprach alfredo diega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.31.1616 +0100]:
> I really believe Debian would benefit if they had a weekly debate.
> I understand you debate on things you are voting on, but I think
> it could be better if you debated on general concerns. I was
> reading the "Why Ubuntu h
On 7/31/06, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
also sprach alfredo diega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.31.1616 +0100]:
> I really believe Debian would benefit if they had a weekly debate.
> I understand you debate on things you are voting on, but I think
> it could be better if you debated
Am Montag 31 Juli 2006 17:08 schrieb Frank Küster:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 09:39:26PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> >>> Do you know of a good example of a tool that has successfully shaped
> >>> D
On Monday 31 July 2006 18:16, alfredo diega wrote:
> I really believe Debian would benefit if they had a weekly debate. I
> understand you debate on things you are voting on, but I think it could be
> better if you debated on general concerns. I was reading the "Why Ubuntu
> has
> all the ideas
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:40:54 -0300, "Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On 7/31/06, Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 20:00:21 +, "Gustavo Franco"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > The packages that aren't under group maintenance and will nev
On Monday 31 July 2006 18:43, Hubert Chan wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:40:54 -0300, "Gustavo Franco"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > On 7/31/06, Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 20:00:21 +, "Gustavo Franco"
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Rémi Denis-Courmont" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ndisc6
Version : 0.6.6
Upstream Author : Rémi Denis-Courmont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.simphalempin.com/dev/ndisc6.
* License : GPL
Programming Lang
see how PC works from inside out The computer you using
Crynwr v.x drivers docs PKTDA.ZIP PKTDB.ZIP drives PKTDC.ZIP update SKLIB.ZIP UNZIP.EXE VAL.ZIP Code
Broker Science Policy Haninah Levine
Shopping Contacts SuSe Old
breaking trends. links on: Subscribe releases Media
theURL winN
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:30:34 +0300, George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> IMHO the maintainer(s) could mention their wishes wrt to NMU and any
> particular package in debian/copyright, right after This package was
> debianized by ... When needed NMU is appreciated/forbidden/whatever
I agree
nice work!
"Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Due to the "my stuff, don't touch that!" current approach, but (again)
> this is just IMHO.
I have had people insist that I needed to maintain a package
differently, but they have all been strangely unwilling to post
clear applyable patches or make N
Hi,
I have finished my initial analysis of Python policy and
dh_python, and created a rough specification of what the python
policy is supposed to be (based on current dh_python behaviour). The
current analysis, and future updates, are to be found at
http://www.golden-gryphon.com/soft
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have finished my initial analysis of Python policy and
> dh_python, and created a rough specification of what the python
> policy is supposed to be (based on current dh_python behaviour). The
> current analysis, and future updates, are to be found at
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 09:39:26PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> Dear fellow developers,
>
> As many of you know, I am conducting research on Debian,
> specifically on how Debian developers adopt or reject new methods of
> package maintenance. I would like to get a broad collection of data
> for
Hi All
I'm trying to get the infra-red remote control working on my MythTV box
and can't find the correct module (ir-kbd-gpio)
So, can anyone tell me where I can find, or how I can compile the
ir-kbd-gpio.ko module.
The module is part of the bttv video4linux driver but the ir-kbd-gpio.c
source
32 matches
Mail list logo
